Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Development of a nanoscale-based optical chemical sensor for the detection of NO radical

Pages
1056–1071
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained limit of detection values for pyrene, Ru(bipy) 2+ 3 and Mg-Pc dyes were 0.15 µM, 1.54 µM, and 0.78 µM, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nitric oxide is one of the most important biochemical parameters in biological processes; it is also known as carcinogenic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we immobilized the nitric oxide sensitive molecules pyrene, tris(2,2’-bipyrdyl)dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate (Ru(bipy) 2+ 3 ), and magnesium phthalocyanine (Mg-Pc) for the first time in polymeric or glassy matrices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The obtained limit of detection values for pyrene, Ru(bipy) 2+ 3 and Mg-Pc dyes were 0.15 µM, 1.54 µM, and 0.78 µM, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nitric oxide is one of the most important biochemical parameters in biological processes; it is also known as carcinogenic. There is need for the design of stable and durable solid phase nitric oxide sensors. In this study, we immobilized the nitric oxide sensitive molecules pyrene, tris(2,2’-bipyrdyl)dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate (Ru(bipy) 2+ 3 ), and magnesium phthalocyanine (Mg-Pc) for the first time in polymeric or glassy matrices. We applied silver nanoparticles and ionic liquids in the fabrication process of polymeric electrospun fibers and thin films. We compared their NO sensitivity in micelle solutions that mimic the cell medium by both steady state and lifetime-based fluorescence measurements. Among the tested dyes, the pyrene exhibited the highest response for radicalic NO. The Mg-Pc dye followed pyrene in terms of sensitivity and exhibited increasing fluorescence intensity and lifetime-based response. Lifetime-based response is advantageous and selective as it is not affected by source variations, photo-bleaching, or leaching effects. Another advantage of Mg-Pc dye is that it is not poisonous for organic systems. Presence of the ionic liquid enhanced the sensor response in all of the test moieties. The obtained limit of detection values for pyrene, Ru(bipy) 2+ 3 and Mg-Pc dyes were 0.15 µM, 1.54 µM, and 0.78 µM, respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖTER, Ö., AYDIN, A. C., ONGUN, M. Z., ÇELİK, E. (2022). Development of a nanoscale-based optical chemical sensor for the detection of NO radical. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 1056–1071. https://ajindex.com/articles/602032

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. McVeigh, G. E.; Hamilton, P.; Wilson, M.; Hanratty, C. G.; Leahey, W. J.; Devine, A. B.; Morgan, D. G.; Dixon, L. J.; McGrath, L. T. Circulation 2002, 106, 208-213
  2. Merrill, J. E.; Murphy, S. P.; Mitrovic, B.; Mackenzie-Graham, A.; Dopp, J. C.; Ding, M. Z.; Griscavage, J.; Ignarro, L. J.; Lowenstein, C. J. J. Neurosci. Res. 1997, 48, 372-384
  3. Moncada, S.; Bolanos, J. P. J. Neurochem. 2006, 97, 1676-1689
  4. Ciszewski, A.; Milczarek, G. Talanta 2003, 61, 11-26
  5. Diab, N.; Schuhmann, W. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 47, 265-273
  6. Silva, J. F.; Griveau, S.; Richard, C.; Zagal, J. H.; Bedioui, F. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 1629-1634
  7. Ishimura, Y.; Gao, Y. T.; Panda, S. P.; Roman, L. J.; Masters, B. S.; Weintraub, S. T. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 338, 543-549
  8. Funazo, K.; Tanaka, M.; Shono, T. Anal. Chim. Acta 1980, 119, 291-297
  9. Kleschyov, A. L.; Wenzel, P.; Munzel, T. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 851, 12-20
  10. Hall, D. M.; Buettner, G. R.; Gisolfi, C. V. Microchem. J. 1997, 56, 165-170
  11. Yang, L. H.; Ahn, D. J.; Koo, E. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 10, 115-123
  12. Itoh, Y.; Ma, F. H.; Hoshi, H.; Oka, M.; Noda, K.; Ukai, Y.; Kojima, H.; Nagano, T.; Toda, N. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 287, 203-209
  13. Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Song, H.; He, C.; Bao, Y; Tang, Q.; Duan, C. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 8371-8375
  14. Kumar, P.; Kalita, A.; Mondal, B. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2013, 404, 88-96
  15. Dacres, H.; Narayanaswamy, R. Sensors Actuators B 2004, 107, 14-23
  16. Ding, L.; Fan, C.; Zhong, Y.; Li, T.; Huang, J. Sensors Actuators B 2013, 185, 70-76
  17. Esquembre, R.; Pastor, I.; Mallavia, R.; Mateo, C. R. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2005, 173, 384-389
  18. Yu, M.; Wang, W.; Zhang, N. Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 126, 329-332
  19. Zhang, X.; Chi, R.; Zou, J.; Zhang, H. S. Spectrochim. Acta A 2014, 60, 3129-3134. 20
  20. Hong, W. Y.; Yang, T. W.; Wang, C. M.; Syu, J. H.; Lin, Y. C.; Meng, H. F.; Tsai, M. J.; Cheng, H.; Zan, H. W.; Horng, S. F. Org. Electro. 2013, 14, 1136-1141
  21. Oter, O.; Ribou, A. C. J. Fluoresc. 2009, 19, 389-397
  22. Lan, E. H.; Dave, B. C.; Fukuto, J. M.; Dunn, B.; Zink, J. I.; Valantine, J. S. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 45-53
  23. Dacres, H.; Narayanaswamy, R. Sens. Actuators, B 2005, 107, 14-23
  24. Dacres, H.; Narayanaswamy, R. Aust. J. Chem. 2008, 61, 189-196
  25. Kacmaz, S.; Ertekin, K.; Oter, O.; Hizliateş, C. G.; Ergun, Y.; Celik, E. J. Lumin. 2015, 168, 228-235
  26. Wang, K.; Ma, Q.; Wang, S.D.; Liu, H.; Zhan