Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

Suppression of interfering ions by using ionic liquid and micelle moieties inspectro uorimetric analysis of manganese

Pages
373–384
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The presented method did not use any harmfulconventional solvents and was employed successfully for the detection of Mn2+ions in real water samples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Eosin-Y exhibits high affinity and emission based spectral response to most of the major ions in watersamples.In the present study we performed selective spectro uorimetric analysis of manganese with eosin-Y in thepresence of potential interferents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experimental data revealedthat different test moieties caused enhanced analytical response to Mn2+.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presented method did not use any harmfulconventional solvents and was employed successfully for the detection of Mn2+ions in real water samples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Eosin-Y exhibits high affinity and emission based spectral response to most of the major ions in watersamples.In the present study we performed selective spectro uorimetric analysis of manganese with eosin-Y in thepresence of potential interferents. We employed green chemistry reagents, ionic liquids (ILs) and two different micelles,to suppress the effect of conventional cations and anions on the response of eosin-Y. The experimental data revealedthat different test moieties caused enhanced analytical response to Mn2+. The highest analytical signal of eosin-Y wasobtained in the presence of Triton X-100 at a concentration of 2.0 103mol L1. Presence of the green chemistryreagents ILs enhanced the limit of quanti cation for Mn2+10-fold with respect to the IL-free moieties. The interferingeffects of the metal ions of Ca2+, Cu2+, Hg+, Hg2+, As5+, Li+, Al3+, Cr3+, Co2+, Ni2+, and the anionic groupswere completely suppressed in the presence of the ILs and micelles. Additionally, the tolerance limit of Na+and Zn2+ions increased 6-fold in the presence of IL and sodium dodecyl sulfate. The presented method did not use any harmfulconventional solvents and was employed successfully for the detection of Mn2+ions in real water samples.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖTER, Ö., ERTEKİN, K., AYDIN, M. (2022). Suppression of interfering ions by using ionic liquid and micelle moieties inspectro uorimetric analysis of manganese. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 373–384. https://ajindex.com/articles/602033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Gerber, G. B.; Leonard, A.; Hantson, P.Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.2002,42, 25-34. 2.Seleim, M. M.; Abu-Bakr, M. S.; Hashem, E. Y.; El-Zohry, A. M.Can. J. Anal. Sci. Spect.2009,54, 93-101. 3.Zatta, P.; Lucchini, R.; Rensburg, S. J.; Taylor, A.Brain Res. Bull.2003,62, 15-17. 4.Dias, F. D.; Alves, L. S.; Santos, W. N. L.; David, J. M.; Ferreira, S. L. C.Anal. Lett.2009,42, 2206-2213. 5.Almeida, L. F.; Vale, M. G. R.; Dessuy, M. B.; Silva, M. M.; Lima, R. S.; Santos, V. B.; Diniz P. H. D.; Araujo,M. C. U.Talanta.2007,73, 906-912. 6.Sreenivasa, Rao, K.; Balaji, T.; Prasada, Rao, T.; Babu, Y.; Naidu, G. R. K.Spectrochim. Acta B.2002,57,1333-1338. 7.Weiss, H. V.; Kenis, P. R.; Korkisch, J.; Steffan, I.Anal. Chim. Acta.1979,104, 337-343. 8.Ruiz, M. C.; Rodriguez, M. H.; Perino, E.; Olsina, R. A.Latin Am. Appl. Res.2004,34, 23-27. 9.Beltagi, M.; Ismail, M. I.; Ghoneim, M. M.Am. J. Anal. Chem.2013,4, 197-206. 10.Ahrland, S.; Herman, R. G.Anal. Chem.1975,47, 2422-2426. 11.Shuhong, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Q.; Wang, Z.; Cui, Y. J.Mater. Chem.2012,22, 9216-9221. 12.Liang, J.; Canary, J. W.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2010,49, 7710-7713. 13.Mao, X.; Su, H.; Tian, D.; Li, H.; Yang, R.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2013,5, 592-597. 14.Gruppi, F.; Liang, J.; Bartelle, B.; Royzen, M.; Turnbull, D. H.; Canary, J. W.Chem. Commun.2012,48,10778-10780. 15.http://www.lifetechnologies.com/tr/en/home/references/molecular-probes-the-handbook/indicators-for-ca2-mg2-zn2-and-other-metal-ions.html. 16.Bakthavatsalam S.; Sarkar, A.; Rakshit, A.; Jain, S.; Kumar, A.; Datta, A.Chem. Commun. (Camb).2015,51,2605-2608. 17.Garca, E. A.; Fernandez, R. G.; Daz-Garca, M. E.Micropor. Mesopor. Mat.2005,77, 235-239. 18.Oter, O.; Aydogdu, S. J.Fluoresc.2011,21, 43-50. 19.Merrigan, L.; Bates, E. D.; Dorman, S. C.Chem. Commun.2000,20, 2051-2052. 20.Oter,O.; Sahin, G. S.Turk. J. Chem.2015,39, 395-411. 21.Oter, O.; Sabanci, G.; Ertekin, K.Sensor Letters2013,11, 1-9. 22.Ongun, M. Z.; Oter, O.; Sabanci, G.; Ertekin. K.; Celik, E.Sens. Actut. B-Chem. 2013,183, 11-19. 23.Matsumiya, H.; Kato, T.; Hiraide, M.Talanta.2014,119, 505-508. 24.Ros, A. P.; Hernandez-Fernandez, F. J.; Lozano, L. J.; Sanchez-Segado, S.; Ginesta-Anzola, A., Godnez, C.;Tomas-Alonso, F.; Quesada, J. M.J. Membr. Sci.2013,444, 469-481. 25.Rios, A. P.; Hernandez-Fernandez, F. J.; Alguacil, F. J.; Lozano, L. J.; Ginesta, A.; Garcia-Diaz, I.; Sanchez-Segado,S.; Lopez, F. A.; Godinez, C.Sep. Purif. Tech.2012,97, 150-157. 26.Wellen