Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

Optimization of sugarcane bagasse activation to achieve adsorbent with high affinity towards phenol

Pages
1720–1735
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All the evidence showed that the mechanisms involved in phenol adsorption were ion-exchange,electrostatic, and physical adsorption.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sugarcane bagasse as an agricultural/industrial biomass was converted into a low-cost activated carbon via anacid activation procedure under optimized conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The optimized activated carbon produced under temperature of 550 °C and impregnationratio of 1.5 showed a micromesoporous structure with specific surface area and pore volume of 972.5 m2/g and 0.43cm3/g, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All the evidence showed that the mechanisms involved in phenol adsorption were ion-exchange,electrostatic, and physical adsorption.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sugarcane bagasse as an agricultural/industrial biomass was converted into a low-cost activated carbon via anacid activation procedure under optimized conditions. Phosphoric acid was applied as a cost-effective and environmentallyfriendly chemical activator. The optimized activated carbon produced under temperature of 550 °C and impregnationratio of 1.5 showed a micromesoporous structure with specific surface area and pore volume of 972.5 m2/g and 0.43cm3/g, respectively. The adsorption capacity of the produced AC towards phenol was measured and, after only 30 min,the removal percentage reached over 95%. The greatest affinity towards phenol was obtained at pH of 4 justified by thepHpzc of the sorbent and speciation of phenol in solution. Under the intermediate concentration range, the Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm was the best-fit model for describing the equilibrium data. The apparent adsorption energy wasequal to 10.94 kJ/mol. All the evidence showed that the mechanisms involved in phenol adsorption were ion-exchange,electrostatic, and physical adsorption.

🔖

Cite This Article

MOHTASHAMI, S. A., KAGHAZCHI, T., KESHEH, R. A., SOLEIMANI, M., KOLUR, N. A. (2022). Optimization of sugarcane bagasse activation to achieve adsorbent with high affinity towards phenol. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 1720–1735. https://ajindex.com/articles/601976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Yahya, M. A.; Al-Qodah, Z.; Ngah, C. W. Z. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2015, 46, 218-235
  2. Giusto, L. A. R.; Pissetti, F. L.; Castro, T. S.; Magalhães, F. Water Air Soil Poll. 2017, 228, 1-11
  3. Tran, V. T.; Quynh, B. T. P.; Phung, T. K.; Ha, G. N.; Nguyen, T. T.; Bach, L. G. Journal of Undergraduate Science & Technology 2016, 54, 277-284
  4. Syna, N.; Valix, M. Mineral Eng. 2003, 16, 511-518
  5. Mohamed, E. F.; El-Hashemy, M. A.; Abdel-Latif, N. M.; Shetaya, W. H. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2015, 65, 1413-1420
  6. Gardare V. N.; Yadav, S.; Avhada, D. N; Rathod, V. K. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 2014, 1-7
  7. Kumar, A.; Jena, H. M. Results Phys. 2016, 6, 651-658
  8. Xu, J.; Chen, L.; Qu, H.; Jiao, Y.; Xie, J.; Xing, G. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 320, 674-680
  9. Satyawali, Y.; Balakrishnan, M. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2629-2635
  10. Soleimani, M.; Kaghazchi, T. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007, 30, 649-654
  11. Giraldo-Gutiérrez, L.; Moreno-Piraján, J. C. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2008, 81, 278-284
  12. Elwakeel, K. Z.; El-Sayed, G. O.; Abo El-Nassr, S. M. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 55, 471-483
  13. Adib, M. R. M.; Suraya, W. M. S. W.; Rafidah, H.; Amirza, A. R. M.; Attahirah, M. H. M. N.; Hani, M. S. N. Q.; Adnan, M. S. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 136, 1-9
  14. Castro, J. B.; Bonelli, P. R.; Cerrella, E. G.; Cukierman, A. L. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 4166-4172
  15. Asadi-Kesheh, R.; Mohtashami, S. A.; Kaghazchi, T.; Asasian, N.; Soleimani, M. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 223-232
  16. Adib, M. R. M.; Attahirah, M. H. M. N.; Amirza, A. R. M. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2018, 140, 012029
  17. Molva, M. MSc, İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir, Turkey, 2004
  18. Nageeb Rashed, M. In Organic Pollutants - Monitoring, Risk and Treatment; Nageeb Rashed, M., Ed. InTech Publisher: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013, pp. 167-194
  19. Kamel, S.; Abou-Yousef, H.; Yousef, M.; El-Sakhawy, M. Polymers 2012, 88, 250-256
  20. Gupta, V. K., Sharma, S.; Yadav, I. S.; Mohan, D. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1998, 71, 180-186
  21. Srivastava, V. C.; Swamy, M. M.; Mall, I. D.; Prasad, B.; Mishra, I. M. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2006, 272, 89-104
  22. Srivastava, V. C.; Prasad, B.; Mishra, I. M.; Mall, I. D.; Swamy, M. M. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1603-1613
  23. Karunarathne, H. D. S. S.; Amarasinghe, B. M. W. P. K. Energy Procedia 2013, 34, 83-90
  24. Mukherjee, S.; Kumar, S.; Misra, A. K.; Fan, M. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 129, 133-142