Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Biological evaluation and synthesis of new pyrimidine-2(1H)-ol/-thiol derivatives derived from chalcones using the solid phase microwave method

Pages
520–535
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Compounds 20–24 and 35–39 exhibit the best activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 62.5–500 µg/mL, indicating their potential use as antituberculous agents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Twenty-five new hydroxy- and methoxy-substituted 4,6-diarylpyrimidin-2(1H)-ol (20–34) and 4,6-diarylpyrimidine-2(1H)-thiol derivatives (35–44) were synthesized from the reaction of the corresponding 1,3-diaryl-2-propene-1- one compounds (1–19) with urea or thiourea using the solid-phase microwave method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All the new synthetic compounds (20–44) were evaluated with regard to their α-glucosidase activity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Compounds 20–24 and 35–39 exhibit the best activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 62.5–500 µg/mL, indicating their potential use as antituberculous agents.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Twenty-five new hydroxy- and methoxy-substituted 4,6-diarylpyrimidin-2(1H)-ol (20–34) and 4,6-diarylpyrimidine-2(1H)-thiol derivatives (35–44) were synthesized from the reaction of the corresponding 1,3-diaryl-2-propene-1- one compounds (1–19) with urea or thiourea using the solid-phase microwave method. All the new synthetic compounds (20–44) were evaluated with regard to their α-glucosidase activity. However, only compounds 22–25, 27, 31, 34, 35, 37, and 40 exhibited a greater inhibitory effect than standard acarbose. The IC50 values of the active compounds ranged between 2.36 and 13.34 µM. The 25 new compounds were also screened for their in vitro pancreatic lipase activity and compounds 20–27 and 35–39 were found to be active. Of these compounds 26, 27, and 39 exhibited the best antilipase activities at concentrations of 0.40 ± 0.06, 0.26 ± 0.07, and 0.29 ± 0.026 µM. All the new compounds (20–44) were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial activity for nine test microorganisms. Compounds 20–24 and 35–39 were determined to possess a significant broad spectrum against the gram-positive bacteria Escherichia faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus cereus among the tested bacterial agents. Compounds 20–24 and 35–39 exhibit the best activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis, with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 62.5–500 µg/mL, indicating their potential use as antituberculous agents.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAOĞLU, Ş. A., FANDAKLI, S., KAHRİMAN, N., YÜCEL, T. B., YAYLI, N. (2022). Biological evaluation and synthesis of new pyrimidine-2(1H)-ol/-thiol derivatives derived from chalcones using the solid phase microwave method. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 520–535. https://ajindex.com/articles/601833

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Amr, A. E.; Nermien, M. S.; Abdulla, M. M. Monatsh. Chem. 2007, 138, 699-707
  2. Bazzaro, M.; Anchoori, R. K.; Mudiam, M. K. R.; Issaenko, O.; Kumar, S.; Karanam, B.; Lin, Z.; Vogel, R. L.; Gavioli, R.; Destro, F.; et al. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 449-456
  3. Kamal, A.; Reddy, J. S.; Ramaiah, M. J.; Dastagiri, D.; Bharathi, E. V.; Sagar, M. V. P.; Pushpavalli, S. N. C. V. L.; Ray, P.; Bhadra, M. P. Med. Chem. Commun. 2010, 1, 355-360
  4. Wagner, E.; Al-Kadasi, K.; Zimecki, M.; Sawka-Dobrowolska, W. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 2498-2504
  5. Virsodia, V.; Pissurlenkar, R. R. S.; Manvar, D.; Dholakia, C.; Adlakha, P.; Shah, A.; Coutinho, E. C. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 2103-2115
  6. Solankee, A.; Patel, K.; Patel, R. A. E- J. Chem. 2012, 9, 1897-1905
  7. Nagaraj, A.; Reddy C. S. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2008, 5, 262-267
  8. Ananakumar, D. B.; Prakash, G. K.; Mahadevan, K. M.; Kumaraswamy, M. N., Nandeshwarappa, B. P.; Sherigara, B. S. Indian J. Chem. 2006, 45B, 1699-1703
  9. Desai, K.; Patel, R.; Chikhalia, K. J. Ind. Chem. 2006, 45B, 773-778
  10. Elumalai, K.; Ali, M. A.; Elumalai, M.; Eluri, K.; Srinivasan, S. J. Acute Dis. 2013, 316-321
  11. Trivedi, A. R.; Dodiya, D. K.; Ravat, N. R.; Shah, V. H. Arkivoc. 2008, 11, 131-141
  12. Khoje, A. D.; Kulendrn, A.; Charnock, C.; Wan, B.; Franzblau, S.; Gundersen, L. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7274-7282
  13. Chaudari, P. K.; Pandey, A.; Shah, V. H. Oriental J. Chem. 2010, 26, 1377-1383
  14. Shmalenyuk, E. R.; Kochetkov, S. N., Alexandrova, L. A. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2013, 82, 896-915
  15. Ballell, L.; Field, R. A.; Chung, G. A. C.; Young, R. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1736-1740
  16. Dmytro, H.; Borys, Z.; Olexandr, V.; Lucjusz, Z.; Andrzej, G.; Roman, L. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 1396-1404
  17. Ozdemir, Z.; Kandilici, H. B.; Gumusel, B.; Calis, U.; Bilgin, A. A. Eur. J. Chem. Med. 2007, 42, 373-379
  18. Tirlapur, V. K.; Gandhi, N.; Basawaraj, R.; Rajendra-Prased Y. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2010, 2, 1434-1440
  19. Arikkatt, D. S.; Chandran M.; Bhat, R. A.; Krishnakumar, K. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 8, 93-97
  20. Patel, V. S.; Patel, D. D.; Patel M. S.; Patel P. S.; Patel K. C. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 7221-7224
  21. Mattew, J., Subba, R. A. V. Curr. Sci. 1984, 53, 576-577
  22. Yamakawa, T.; Kagechika, H.; Kawachi, E.; Hashimoto Y.; Shedo, K. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1430-1437
  23. Gorlitzer, K.; Herbig, S.; Walter, R. D. Pharmazie 1997, 52, 670-672
  24. Wallis, M. P.; Mahmood, N.; William, F. W. Il