Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

A novel hypobromous acid scavenging activity assay using p-cresol as a spectrofluorometric probe

Pages
429–438
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The advantage of the proposed method over the KI/taurine assay was demonstrated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a novel spectrofluorometric assay based on p-cresol (4-methyl phenol) probe is developed for the measurement of HOBr scavenging activity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While the p-cresol probe (λex = 260 nm, λem = 305 nm) has fluorescence characteristics, its brominated derivatives emerging at the end of the oxidation reaction with HOBr do not show fluorescence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The advantage of the proposed method over the KI/taurine assay was demonstrated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, a novel spectrofluorometric assay based on p-cresol (4-methyl phenol) probe is developed for the measurement of HOBr scavenging activity. It is the first study involving the use of a p-cresol probe for the determination of the HOBr scavenging activity of biothiols. While the p-cresol probe (λex = 260 nm, λem = 305 nm) has fluorescence characteristics, its brominated derivatives emerging at the end of the oxidation reaction with HOBr do not show fluorescence. The initial fluorescence intensity of the p-cresol probe is decreased in the presence of the brominating agent, HOBr, and this decrease is lower in the presence of HOBr scavenging antioxidants. The scavenging activities of biothiols tested with respect to the developed method decrease in the following order: penicillamine > N-acetyl cysteine > L-glutathione (reduced) > cysteamine > homocysteine > glutathione ethyl ester > cysteine > 1,4-dithiothreitol > lipoic acid > methionine. Penicillamine $(IC_{50} = 10.12 µM)$ was the most effective HOBr-scavenger among the tested biothiols. The results obtained with the developed method for biothiols and some pharmaceutical samples were statistically compared (using ANOVA) to those found by the reference methods (KI/taurine and UPLC). The advantage of the proposed method over the KI/taurine assay was demonstrated.

🔖

Cite This Article

APAK, M. R., BEKDEŞER, B., ÖZYÜREK, M., ZEYTÜNLÜ, G. (2022). A novel hypobromous acid scavenging activity assay using p-cresol as a spectrofluorometric probe. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 429–438. https://ajindex.com/articles/601755

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Thomas, E. L. Infect. Immun. 1979, 23, 522-531
  2. Justino, G. C.; Rodrigues, M.; Florˆencio, M. H.; Mira, L. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 44, 1459-1468
  3. Pattison, D. I.; Davies, M. J. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 4799-4809
  4. Storkey, C.; Pattison, D. I.; White, J. M.; Schiesser, C. H.; Davies, M. J. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 25, 2589-2599
  5. Ximenes, V. F.; Morgon, N. H.; de Souza, A. R. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2015, 146, 61-68
  6. Wang, J.; Slungaard, A. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 445, 256-260
  7. Landino, L. M.; Mall, C. B.; Nicklay, J. J.; Dutcher, S. K.; Moynihan, K. L. Nitric Oxide 2008, 18, 11-18
  8. Nagy, P.; Beal, J. L.; Ashby, M. T. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 587-593
  9. Hawkins, C. L.; Davies, M. J. Free Radical Bio. Med. 2005, 39, 900-912
  10. Xu, K.; Luan, D.; Wang, X.; Hu, B.; Liu, X.; Kong, F.; Tang, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2016, 55, 12751-12754
  11. Yu, F.; Song, P.; Li, P.; Wang, B.; Han, K. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7735-7737
  12. Grootboom, N.; Nyokong, T. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 432, 49-57
  13. Ozy¨urek, M.; Bekde¸ser, B.; Güçlü, K.; Apak, R. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 9529-9536
  14. Niwa, T. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39, 108-111
  15. Gallard, H.; Pellizzari, F.; Crou´e, J. P.; Legube, B. Water Res. 2003, 37, 2883-2892
  16. Marcinkiewicz, J. J. Biomed. Sci. 2010, 17, 1-5
  17. Thomas, E. L.; Bozeman, P. M.; Jefferson, M. M.; King, C. C. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 2906-2913
  18. Marcinkiewicz, J.; Kontny, E. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 7-20
  19. Weiss, S. J.; Klein, R.; Slivka, A.; Wei, M. J. Clin. Invest. 1982, 70, 598-607
  20. Ellman, G. L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959, 82, 70-77
  21. Alexander, N. M. Anal. Biochem. 1962, 4, 351-355
  22. Dypbukt, J. M.; Bishop, C.; Brooks, W. M.; Thong, B.; Eriksson, H.; Kettle, A. J. Free Radical Bio. Med. 2005, 39, 1468-1477
  23. Lo Conte, M.; Carroll, K. S. In Oxidative Stress and Redox Regulation; Jakob, U.; Reichmann, D., Eds. Springer: Netherlands, 2013, pp. 1-42
  24. Darkwa, J.; Mundoma, C.; Simoyi, R. H. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday T. 1998, 94, 1971-1978
  25. Soobrattee, M. A.; Neergheen, V. S.; Luximon-Ramma, A.; Aruoma, O. I.; Bahorun, T. Mutat. Res. 2005, 579, 200-213
  26. Aruoma, O. I.; Halliwell, B.; Hoey, B. M.; Butler, J. Biochem. J. 1988, 256, 251-255
  27. Morakinyo, M. K.; Chikwana, E.; Simoyi, R. H. Can. J. Chem. 2008, 86, 416-425
  28. Aruoma, O. I. Gen. Pharmacol. 1997, 28, 269-272
  29. Vissers, M. C. M.; Carr, A. C.; Chapman, A. L. P. Biochem. J. 1998, 330, 131-138
  30. Gazda, M.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem.