Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4

Molecular characterization of edible pea through EST-SSR markers

Pages
338–346
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that EST-SSR markers are useful for refinement of the pea linkage map.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The genetic diversity among 23 newly developed homosegregate pea lines (Pisum sativum L.) was assessed with a total of 13 expressed sequence tag (EST) based-simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The percentages of amplified and nonamplified primers were 92% and 8%, respectively, and 58.33% of the used primers gave the PCR product within the reported size range while 41.66% of primers gave a different product size.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that EST-SSR markers are useful for refinement of the pea linkage map.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The genetic diversity among 23 newly developed homosegregate pea lines (Pisum sativum L.) was assessed with a total of 13 expressed sequence tag (EST) based-simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The percentages of amplified and nonamplified primers were 92% and 8%, respectively, and 58.33% of the used primers gave the PCR product within the reported size range while 41.66% of primers gave a different product size. Polymorphism information content (PIC), major allele frequency, and variation in genetic diversity were calculated. The PIC ranged from 0.32 to 0.63 with an average of 0.50. Major allele frequency ranged from 0.48 to 0.78 with a mean value of 0.56. The variation in genetic diversity among these pea lines ranged from 0.36 to 0.68 with a mean value of 0.56. Cluster analysis based on a dendrogram divided the 23 pea lines into two main groups (L-1 and L-2), separated at 25% genetic distance. Seven subclusters were evident from these two main groups. L-1 grouped 51.2% (12 pea lines) while L-2 contained 47.8% (11 pea lines) of the total analyzed population. It was concluded that EST-SSR markers are useful for refinement of the pea linkage map.

🔖

Cite This Article

HANCI, F., KHAN, A., NISAR, M., WADOOD, S. F., SHAH, A. A. (2022). Molecular characterization of edible pea through EST-SSR markers. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4, 338–346. https://ajindex.com/articles/601141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Able JA, Langridge P, Milligan AS (2007). Capturing diversity in the cereals: many options but little promiscuity. Trends Plant Sci 12: 71-79.
  2. Ahmad S, Singh M, Lamb-Palmer ND, Lefsrud M, Singh J (2012). Assessment of genetic diversity in 35 Pisum sativum accessions using microsatellite markers. Can J Plant Sci 92: 1075-1081.
  3. Baranger A, Aubert G, Arnau G, Lainé A, Deniot G, Potier J, Weinachter C, Lejeune-Hénaut I, Lallemand J, Burstin J (2004). Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using proteinand PCR-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1309-1321.
  4. Belaj A, Satovic Z, Cipriani G, Baldoni L, Testolin R, Rallo L (2003). Comparative study of the discriminating capacity of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers and of their effectiveness in establishing genetic relationships in olive. Theor Appl Genet 107: 736-744.
  5. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980). Construction of genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314-331.
  6. Burstin J, Potier GDJ, Weinachter C, Aubert G, Baranger A (2001). Microsatellite polymorphism in Pisum sativum. Plant Breeding 120: 311-317.
  7. Caballero A, García-Dorado A (2013). Allelic diversity and its implications for the rate of adaptation. Genetics 195: 1373- 1384. Cieslarová J, Hýbl M, Griga M, Smýkal P (2012). Molecular analysis of temporal genetic structuring in pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars bred in the Czech Republic and in former Czechoslovakia since the mid-20th century. Czech J Genet Plant 48: 61-73.
  8. Cuevas HE, Prom LK (2013). Assessment of molecular diversity and population structure of the Ethiopian sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm collection maintained by the USDA-ARS national plant germplasm system using SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Ev 60: 1817-1830.
  9. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19-21.
  10. Gixhari B, Pavelkov ÁM, Ismaili H, Vrapi H, Jaupi A, Smýkal P (2014). Genetic diversity of Albanian pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces assessed by morphological traits and molecular markers. Czech J Genet Plant 50: 177-184.
  11. Gong YM, Xu SC, Mao WH, Hu QZ, Zhang GW, Ding J, Li YD (2010). Developing new SSR markers from ESTs of pea (Pisum sativum L.). J Zhejiang Univ-Sc B 11: 702-707.
  12. Govindaraj M, Vetriventhan M, Srinivasan M (2015). Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: an overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics Research International 2015: 431487.