Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6

Genetic diversity and molecular characterization of natural Pancratium maritimum L. populations by DNA markers

Pages
569–578
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study include important information about the genetic structure of the studied populations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bulbous plants play an important role in Turkey’s biodiversity due to their great potential use in various industries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All RAPD and nrSSR loci, except SSR-20, were found to be polymorphic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study include important information about the genetic structure of the studied populations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bulbous plants play an important role in Turkey’s biodiversity due to their great potential use in various industries. Sea daffodils (Pancratium maritimum), one aspect of Turkey’s biological richness, represent an important bulbous plant that generally spreads on sand dunes and can be seen only on the Mediterranean coast and on its certain beaches in our country. In this study, the genetic structure and genetic diversity of four natural P. maritimum populations have been determined by RAPD and nrSSR primers. Eight RAPD and four nrSSR loci were analyzed. All RAPD and nrSSR loci, except SSR-20, were found to be polymorphic. Genetic diversity parameters such as mean number of alleles for each nrSSR loci $(N_a = 3.313)$, effective allele number $(N_e = 2.190)$, Shannon’s information index (I = 0.728), observed heterozygosity $(H_o = 0.449)$ and expected heterozygosity $(H_e = 0.396)$ were calculated. A rather high proportion of the genetic diversity (81% for nrSSR, 72% for RAPD) was due to within-population variation and the remaining part was due to variation between populations. According to the acquired UPGMA phenogram for RAPD and nrSSR data, the İğneada and Çamlıkoy populations, which are geographically close, are also genetically the most similar populations. The STRUCTURE analysis results supported the constructed UPGMA phenogram for the studied sea daffodil populations. The results of this study include important information about the genetic structure of the studied populations.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELİBOL, C., BİLGEN, B. B. (2022). Genetic diversity and molecular characterization of natural Pancratium maritimum L. populations by DNA markers. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6, 569–578. https://ajindex.com/articles/601129

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Balestri E, Cinelli F (2004). Germination and early-seedling establishment capacity of Pancratium maritimum L. (Amaryllidaceae) on coastal dunes in the North-Western Mediterranean. J Coastal Res 20: 761-770.
  2. Bogdanova Y, Pandova B, Yanev S, Stanilova M (2009). Biosynthesis of lycorine by in vitro cultures of Pancratium maritimum L. (Amaryllidaceae). Biotechnol Biotechn Eq 23: 919-922.
  3. Ciccarelli D (2015). Mediterranean coastal dune vegetation: Are disturbance and stress the key selective forces that drive the psammophilous succession? Estuar Coast Shelf S 165: 247-253.
  4. Davis PH (1984). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. De Castro O, Brullo S, Colombo P, Jury S, De Luca P, Di Maio A (2012). Phylogenetic and biogeographical inferences for Pancratium (Amaryllidaceae), with an emphasis on the Mediterranean species based on plastid sequence data. Bot J Linn Soc 170: 12-28.
  6. De Castro O, Di Maio A, Di Febbraro M, Imparato G, Innangi M, Vela E, Menale B (2016). A multi-faceted approach to analyse the effects of environmental variables on geographic range and genetic structure of a perennial psammophilous geophyte: the case of the sea daffodil Pancratium maritimum L. in the Mediterranean basin. PLoS One 11: e0164816. Demir A (2013). Sürdürülebilir gelişmede yükselen değer; biyolojik çeşitlilik açısından Türkiye değerlendirmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 24: 67-74 (in Turkish). Demir Z, Muderrisoglu H, Aksoy N, Aydin SO, Uzun S, Ozkara H (2010). Effects of second housing and recreational use on Pancratium maritimum L. population in western Black Sea region of Turkey. J Food Agric Environ 8: 890-894.
  7. Di Maio A, De Castro O (2013). Development and characterization of 21 microsatellite markers for Pancratium maritimum L. (Amaryllidaceae). Conserv Genet Resour 5: 911-914. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4: 359-361.
  8. Ekim T, Koyuncu M, Vural M, Duman H, Aytaç Z, Adıgüzel N (2000). Red Data Book of Turkish Plants (Pteridophyta and Spermatophyta). Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Association for Conservation of Nature (in Turkish). El-Hadidy A, El-Ghani MA, Amer W, Hassan R (2012). Morphological and molecular differentiation between Egyptian species of Pancratium L. (Amaryllidaceae). Acta Biol Cracov Bot 54: 53- 64. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005). Detecting the number of