Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 6

Türkiye’nin kuzeyinde (Samsun) bir Quercus cerris L. var. cerris ormanında bulunan bazı bitkilerin Grime’in stratejilerine göre sınıflandırılması

Classification of some plant species according to Grime’s strategies in a Quercus cerris L. var. cerris woodland in Samsun, northern Turkey

Pages
521–529
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In both plots, CR (competitor-ruderal) was the most common strategy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out on 2 permanent plots of Quercus cerris L. var. cerris woodland in the Kurupelit region of Samsun, northern Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Grime’s CSR strategies were determined for 85 plant species from the 2 study plots (61 and 50 species from plot 1 and plot 2, respectively) according to the method that was applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In both plots, CR (competitor-ruderal) was the most common strategy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out on 2 permanent plots of Quercus cerris L. var. cerris woodland in the Kurupelit region of Samsun, northern Turkey. Grime’s CSR strategies were determined for 85 plant species from the 2 study plots (61 and 50 species from plot 1 and plot 2, respectively) according to the method that was applied. Most of the plant species in both plots had secondary and tertiary strategies, and this suggests that plants were exposed to more than one pressure factor. In both plots, CR (competitor-ruderal) was the most common strategy.

Özet

Bu çalışma Samsun’un Kurupelit bölgesinde bulunan bir Quercus cerris L. var. cerris ormanından alınan iki devamlı örnek parselde yürütülmüştür. Örnek parsellerden toplanan bitkilerin Grime’in CSR stratejileri belirlenmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında 1. örnek parselden 61, 2. örnek parselden 50, toplamda 85 türün CSR stratejisi belirlenmiştir. Araştıma sonuçlarına göre, her iki alanda da bitkilerin büyük bir kısmı ikincil ve üçüncül strateji göstermektedir. Bu da bitkilerin birden fazla baskıya maruz kaldığını ifade etmektedir. Her iki örnek parselde de en çok bulunan bitki stratejisi CR’dir (competitor-ruderal).

🔖

Cite This Article

KILINÇ, M., KUTBAY, H. G., KARAVİN, N. (2022). Türkiye’nin kuzeyinde (Samsun) bir Quercus cerris L. var. cerris ormanında bulunan bazı bitkilerin Grime’in stratejilerine göre sınıflandırılması. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 6, 521–529. https://ajindex.com/articles/601107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bazzaz FA (1987). Experimental studies on the evolution of niche in successional plant populations. In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ & Edwards PJ (eds.) Colonization, Succession and Stability, pp. 245-272. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Brummitt RK & Powell CE (1992). Authors of Plant Names. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. Caccianiga M, Luzzaro A, Pierce S, Ceriani RM & Cerabolini B (2006). The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification. Oikos 112: 10-20. Campbell BD & Grime JP (1992). An experimental test of plant strategy theory. Ecology 73: 15-29.
  2. Craine JM (2005). Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman. J Ecol 93: 1041-1052.
  3. Craine JM (2007). Plant strategy theories: replies to Grime and Tilman. J Ecol 95: 235-240.
  4. Çakır YB, Özbucak T, Kutbay HG, Kılıç D, Bilgin A & Hüseyinova R (2010). Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption in a salt marsh in northern Turkey. Turk J Bot 34: 311-322. Davis PH (ed.) (1965-1985). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vols. 1-9. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Davis PH, Mill R & Tan K (eds.) (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Suppl. 1). Vol. 10, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ Press. Decocq G & Hermy M (2008). Are there herbaceous dryads in temperate deciduous forests? Acta Bot Gallica 150: 373-382. Ecke F & Rydin H (2000). Succession on a land uplift coast in relation to plant strategy theory. Ann Bot Fenn 37: 163-171.
  6. Garbey C, Murphy KJ, Thiebaut G & Müller S (2004). Variation in Pcontent in aquatic plant tissues offers an efficient tool for determining plant growth strategies along a resource gradient. Freshwater Biol 49: 1-11. Greulich S & Bornette G (1999). Competitive abilities and related strategies in four aquatic plant species from an intermediately disturbed habitat. Freshwater Biol 41: 493-506.
  7. Grime JP (1974). Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250: 26-31.
  8. Grime JP (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111: 1169-1194.
  9. Grime JP (1979). Plant strategies and vegetation process. Chichester, New York: John Wiley. Grime JP (1987). Dominant and subordinate components of plant communities: implications for succession, stability and diversity. In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ & Edwards PJ (eds.) Colonization, Succession and Stability, pp. 413-428. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Grime JP, Hodgson JG & Hunt R (1988). Comparative