Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Study of phylogenetic relationship of Turkish species ofMatthiola (Brassicaceae) based on ISSR amplification

Pages
130–136
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Clearly, the genera Matthiola, Sterigmostemum, Strigosella, Malcolmia, and Chorispora are phylogenetically differentiated on the dendrogram.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Matthiola W.T.Aiton is a taxonomically complex genus in which there are many problems, mostly with Matthiola longipetalaand M. odoratissima.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The phylogenetic relationships among the taxa were represented on a dendrogram constructed through means of NTSYSpc 2.02 software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Clearly, the genera Matthiola, Sterigmostemum, Strigosella, Malcolmia, and Chorispora are phylogenetically differentiated on the dendrogram.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Matthiola W.T.Aiton is a taxonomically complex genus in which there are many problems, mostly with Matthiola longipetalaand M. odoratissima. Matthiola species native to Turkey were collected from various locations in Anatolia, and their DNA was isolated. Revision studies performed on the basis of molecular data obtained from studies conducted in recent years have made the phylogenetic relationships and systematic positions of the taxa more apparent and reliable. Consequently, the remaining taxonomic problems among the species have been resolved through the use of DNA-based molecular analysis methods, which, unlike phenotype studies, are not affected by environmental factors. The inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) fingerprinting method was used in the study because its properties were considered to be more reliable and consistent than those of the randomly amplified polymorphic DNA method. DNA fragments were amplified through the use of ISSR primers. The phylogenetic relationships among the taxa were represented on a dendrogram constructed through means of NTSYSpc 2.02 software. The infrageneric and intergeneric phylogenetic relationships between Matthiola and other related genera were also characterized. It was determined that the taxa Matthiola odoratissima and M. ovatifolia are separate but closely related. Moreover, it was observed that the Matthiola longipetala complex forms a separate group within the genera. Clearly, the genera Matthiola, Sterigmostemum, Strigosella, Malcolmia, and Chorispora are phylogenetically differentiated on the dendrogram.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, M., ÇELİK, M., SEFALI, A., KAYA, A., DOĞAN, B., MARTİN, E. (2022). Study of phylogenetic relationship of Turkish species ofMatthiola (Brassicaceae) based on ISSR amplification. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 130–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/601061

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Al-Shehbaz IA (2012). A generic and tribal synopsis of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae). Taxon 61: 931–954. Al-Shehbaz IA, Beilstein MA, Kellogg EA (2006). Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview. Plant Syst Evol 259: 89–120. Appel O, Al-Shehbaz IA (2003). Matthiola R.Br. In: Kubitzki K, Bayer C, editors. The Families and Genera of vascular plants. Flowering plants, Dicotyledons: Malvales, Capparales, and Non-Betalanin Caryophyllales. Vol. 5. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. p. 140. APG (2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141: 399–436. Ball PW (1964). Matthiola R.Br. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, editors. Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 340–341. Beilstein MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Kellogg EA (2006). Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution. Am J Bot 93: 607–619. Beilstein MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Mathews S, Kellogg EA (2008). Brassicaceae phylogeny inferred from phytochrome A and NDHF sequence data: tribes and trichomes revisited. Am J Bot 95: 1307–1327. Couvreur TLP, Franzke A, Al-Shehbaz IA, Bakker FT, Koch MA, Mummenhoff K (2010). Molecular phylogenetics, temporal diversification and principles of evolution in the mustard family (Brassicaceae). Mol Biol Evol 27: 55–71. Cullen J (1965). Matthiola R.Br. In: Davis PH, editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 1. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 447–450. Davis PH, Tan K, Mill RR, editors (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 10. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Dirmenci T, Satıl F, Tümen G (2006). A new species of Matthiola R. Br. (Brassicaceae) from Turkey. Bot J Linn Soc 151: 431–435. Dogan B, Duran A, Hakki EE (2007). Phylogenetic analysis of Jurinea(Asteraceae) species from Turkey based on ISSR amplification. Ann Bot Fenn 44: 353–358. Doğan B, Ünal M, Özgökçe F, Martin E, Kaya A (2011). Phylogenetic relationships between Malcolmia, Strigosella, Zuvanda, and some closely related genera (Brassicaceae) from Turkey revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat amplification. Turk J Bot 35: 17–23. Domenyuk VP, Verbitskaya TG, Belousov AA, Sivolap YM (2002). Marker analysis of quantitative traits in maize by ISSR-PCR. Russian J Genet 38: 1161–1168. Galvan MZ, Bornet B, Balatti PA, Branchard M (2003). Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers as a tool