Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Volumetric analysis of airborne pollen grains in the city of Uşak, Turkey

Pages
57–72
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results obtained in the study indicated that the dominant airborne pollen types detected in Uşakgenerally had allergenic effects at moderate or high levels and that these taxa reached the highest amount in May.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Airborne pollen in Uşak, a province in Turkey, was studied for two years (from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2016) using thevolumetric method and the most recent pollen data of the region were obtained.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the study, 23,915 pollen grains were detected.The pollens detected belonged to 53 taxa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results obtained in the study indicated that the dominant airborne pollen types detected in Uşakgenerally had allergenic effects at moderate or high levels and that these taxa reached the highest amount in May.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Airborne pollen in Uşak, a province in Turkey, was studied for two years (from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2016) using thevolumetric method and the most recent pollen data of the region were obtained. During the study, 23,915 pollen grains were detected.The pollens detected belonged to 53 taxa. Of the 53 taxa, 28 were woody and 25 were herbaceous. Of the pollen grains detected, 86%(20,565 pollen grains) were from woody plants, 4.74% (1133 pollen grains) belonged to Poaceae, and 8.65% (2071 pollen grains) werefrom other herbaceous plants, whereas 0.61% (146 pollen grains) were unidentified pollen grains. Of the woody taxa, those whose pollengrains comprised more than 1% each of the total number of pollen grains during the study wereQuercus(32.60%), Pinaceae (31.96%),Cupressaceae/Taxaceae (10.22%),Fraxinus(5.47%), andPlatanus(1.12%), whereas of the herbaceous taxa, those whose pollen grainscomprised more than 1% each of the total number of pollen grains were Poaceae (4.74%), Amaranthaceae (1.82%),Plantago(1.59%),andRumex(1.18%). In the two-year period, the highest airborne pollen concentrations were recorded in May (47.30%), followed byApril (27.64%) and June (10.47%). The results obtained in the study indicated that the dominant airborne pollen types detected in Uşakgenerally had allergenic effects at moderate or high levels and that these taxa reached the highest amount in May.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARAN, P., UĞUZ, U., GÜVENSEN, A., DEREBOYLU, A. E., TORT, N. Ş. (2022). Volumetric analysis of airborne pollen grains in the city of Uşak, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 57–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/600925

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Andersen TB (1991). A model to predict the beginning of the pollen season. Grana 30: 269-275.
  2. Ballero M, Maxia A (2003). Pollen spectrum variations in the atmosphere of Cagliari, Italy. Aerobiologia 19: 251-259.
  3. Bıçakçı A, Inceoğlu O, Sapan N, Malyer H (1996). Airborne pollen calendar of the center of Bursa (Turkey). Aerobiologia 12: 43- 46. Bıçakcı A, Benlioglu ON, Erdogan D (1999). Airborne pollen concentration in Kütahya. Turk J Bot 23: 75-81.
  4. Bıçakçı A, Ergün S, Tatlıdil S, Malyer H, Ozyurt S, Akkaya A, Sapan N (2002).
  5. Airborne pollen grains of Afyon, Turkey. Acta Bot Sin 44: 1371-1375.
  6. Bıcakçı A, Koc RD, Tatlıdil S, Benlioglu ON (2004). Analysis of airborne pollen fall in Usak, Turkey. Pak J Bot 36: 711-717.
  7. Bıçakçı A, Altunoğlu MK, Bilişik A, Çelenk S, Canıtez Y, Malyer H, Sapan N (2009). Türkiye’nin atmosferik polenleri. Asthma Allergy Immunology 7: 11-17.
  8. Bicakci A, Tosunoglu A, Altunoglu MK, Saatcioglu G, Keser AM, Ozgokce F (2017). An aeropalynological survey in the city of Van, a high altitudinal region, East Anatolia-Turkey. Aerobiologia 33: 93-108.
  9. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, Zuberbier T, Baena-Cagnani CE, Canonica GW, Van Weel C et al. (2008). Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy 63 (Suppl 86): 8-160.
  10. Celenk S, Bicakci A (2005). Aerobiological investigation in Bitlis, Turkey. Ann Agr Env Med 12: 87-93.
  11. Celenk S, Bicakci A, Tamay Z, Guler N, Altunoglu MK, Canitez Y, Malyer H, Sapan N, Ones U (2010). Airborne pollen in European and Asian parts of Istanbul. Environ Monit Assess 164: 391-402.
  12. Chapman JA, Williams S (1984). Aeroallergens of the southeast Missouri area: a report of skin test frequencies and air sampling data. Ann Allergy 52: 411-418.
  13. Charpin D, Calleja M, Lahoz C, Pichot C, Waisel Y (2005). Allergy to cypress pollen. Allergy 60: 293-301.
  14. Çeter T, Pinar NM, Güney K, Yildiz A, Aşçı B, Smith M (2012). A 2-year aeropalynological survey of allergenic pollen in the atmosphere of Kastamonu, Turkey. Aerobiologia 28: 355-366.
  15. Çırpıcı A (1989). Flora of Murat Dağı (Kütahya-Uşak). Turk J Bot 13: 157-222. D’Amato G, Lobefalo G (1989). Allergenic pollens in th e Southern Mediterranean area. J Allergy Clin Immun 83: 116-122. D’Amato G, Cecchi L, Bonini S, Nunes C, Annesi-Maesano I, Behrendt H, Liccardi G, Popov T, Van Cauwenberge P (2007). Allergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy 62: