Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

Genetic variation and population differentiation of Dorystaechas hastata endemic to Turkey: Implications for conservation management

Pages
288–301
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall genetic diversity of D. hastata was relatively high at the species level, while it is relatively low at the population level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dorystaechas hastata is a relict endemic medicinal and aromatic plant under risk of extinction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The genetic structure of 56 accessions sampled from 15 populations encompassing whole natural distribution of the species were analyzed with both sequencerelated amplified polymorphism (SRAP) and inter-primer binding site (iPBS) molecular markers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall genetic diversity of D. hastata was relatively high at the species level, while it is relatively low at the population level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Dorystaechas hastata is a relict endemic medicinal and aromatic plant under risk of extinction. Assessment of genetic diversity and association between geographic distribution and genetic variation could benefit to the conservation efforts. The objectives of this study were to assess genetic diversity and population differentiation of the species in its natural habitat. The genetic structure of 56 accessions sampled from 15 populations encompassing whole natural distribution of the species were analyzed with both sequencerelated amplified polymorphism (SRAP) and inter-primer binding site (iPBS) molecular markers. The 146 polymorphic markers were generated by 13 SRAP and 11 iPBS primers. The similarity of the accessions ranged from 53% to 91%, with a mean similarity value of 72%. The populations formed two main groups. Principle component analyses (PCoA) and cluster analysis explained 64.9% and 9.4% of the variations with the first and second eigen vectors. The overall genetic diversity of D. hastata was relatively high at the species level, while it is relatively low at the population level. The pairwise allelic differences between populations (FST), an indication of population differentiation, ranged from 0.15 (Tünektepe -Hacısekiler) to 0.76 (Altınyaka - Sivridağ). The AMOVA results indicated that 51% and 49% of the total variation resided among and within populations, respectively. Geographic distance and/or isolation seem to have strong effect on the genetic differentiation among populations. Results indicate that a representative core collection can be established without significant compromise on genetic diversity. Having the highest genetic diversity Tahtalı, Güllük (Termessos), Beldibi, and Beycik populations must be conserved immediately in nature and might be used to initiate domestication/breeding programs.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEYDAN, H., SELİM, C., MUTLU, N., MUTLU, S. S., DENİZ, İ. G. (2022). Genetic variation and population differentiation of Dorystaechas hastata endemic to Turkey: Implications for conservation management. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 288–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/600782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agarwal M, Shrivastava N, Padh H (2008). Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences. Plant Cell Reports 27: 617. Aghaei Z, Talebi M, Rahimmalek M (2017). Assessment of genetic diversity within and among sage (Salvia) species using SRAP markers. Plant Genetic Resources 15: 279-282.
  2. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias-Diego Y, Lobo J (2008). Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Molecular Ecology 17:5177-1588.
  3. Barrett SCH, Kohn JR (1991). Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants implication for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (editors). Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-30.
  4. Barrett SCH (2003). Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358, 991-1004.
  5. Barrett SCH (2010). Understanding plant reproductive diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 99-109.
  6. Borna F, Luo S, Ahmad NM, Nazeri V, Shokrpour M et al. (2017). Genetic diversity in populations of the medicinal plant Leonurus cardiaca L. revealed by inter-primer binding site (iPBS) markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 64: 479-492.
  7. Celep F, Dirmenci T (2017). Systematic and biogeographic overview of Lamiaceae in Turkey. Natural Volatiles and Essential Oils 4 (4):14-27.
  8. Chen SY, Dai TX, Chang YT, Wang SS, Ou SL et al. (2013). Genetic diversity among Ocimum species based on ISSR, RAPD and SRAP markers. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7: 1463- 1471. Cruzan MB (2001). Population size and fragmentation thresholds for the maintenance of genetic diversity in the herbaceous endemic Scutellaria montana (Lamiaceae). Evolution 55: 1569- 1580. Davis PH (1971). Distribution Patterns in Anatolia with Particular References to Endemism. In: Davis PH, Harper PC, Hedge IC (editors). Plant Life of South- west Asia. Edinburgh, UK: The Botanical Society of Edinburgh, pp. 15-27.
  9. De Vrient L, Lemay MA, Jean M, Renaut S, Pellerin S et al. (2017). Population isolation shapes plant genetics, phenotype and germination in naturally patchy ecosystems. Journal of Plant Ecology 10: 649-659.
  10. Doğan NY, Kandemir A, Osman E (2016). Genetic diversity and variability among populations and ecological characteristics of the Uechtritzia armena Frey