Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: Özel sayı 1

Proteomic analysis reveals different responses to drought between the Cleome spinosa (C3) and Cleome gynandra (C4)

Pages
643–654
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proteomic analysis suggests different adaptive strategies between C. spinosa and C. gynandra against drought stress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The global emergence of low water availability causes extensive damage to crops in many regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, we aimed to identify quantitative differences in proteins functioning in differential drought tolerance of C3 (Cleome spinosa) and C4 (C. gynandra) species.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proteomic analysis suggests different adaptive strategies between C. spinosa and C. gynandra against drought stress.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The global emergence of low water availability causes extensive damage to crops in many regions. Although the responses of plants to drought stress have been extensively investigated, molecular studies on plants with different carboxylation pathways are limited. Therefore, we aimed to identify quantitative differences in proteins functioning in differential drought tolerance of C3 (Cleome spinosa) and C4 (C. gynandra) species. Proteomic analysis functionally characterized 33 differentially accumulated proteins in C. spinosa and 15 proteins in C. gynandra leaves. The identified proteins were involved in multiple aspects of leaf metabolism such as photosynthesis, energy metabolism, protein metabolism, and stress defense. The up-regulated accumulation of RuBisCO proteins may have contributed to carboxylation in stressed C. spinosa, but RuBisCO activase proteins were severely down-regulated. Additionally, down-regulation of ferredoxin-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) reductase and oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins was only found in C. spinosa, which possibly related to the inhibition of electron flow. The up-regulation of enolase may contribute to the energy requirement in C. gynandra, while down-regulation of glycolytic enzymes, such as fructose-bisphosphate aldolase and triosephosphate isomerase, was found in C. spinosa suggesting the impaired energy metabolism under drought stress. The proteomic analysis suggests different adaptive strategies between C. spinosa and C. gynandra against drought stress.

🔖

Cite This Article

TERZİ, H., YILDIZ, M., KAYA, F. (2022). Proteomic analysis reveals different responses to drought between the Cleome spinosa (C3) and Cleome gynandra (C4). Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: Özel sayı 1, 643–654. https://ajindex.com/articles/600757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ashraf M, Akram NA, Al-Qurainy F, Foolad MR (2011). Drought tolerance: roles of organic osmolytes, growth regulators and mineral nutrients. Advances in Agronomy 111: 249-296. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00002-3
  2. Bradford MM (1976). Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein–dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999 Bräutigam A, Kajala K, Wullenweber J, Sommer M, Gagneul D et al. (2011). An mRNA blueprint for C4 photosynthesis derived from comparative transcriptomics of closely related C3 and C4 species. Plant Physiology 155: 142. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.159442 Briat JF, Ravet K, Arnaud N, Duc C, Boucherez J et al. (2010). New insights into ferritin synthesis and function highlight a link between iron homeostasis and oxidative stress in plants. Annals of Botany 105: 811-822. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp128 Brown NJ, Parsley K, Hibberd JM (2005). The future of C4 research – maize, Flaveria or Cleome? Trends in Plant Science 10: 215- 221. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.003 Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri GM et al. (2004). Blue silver: a very sensitive colloidal Coomassie G-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis 25: 1327-1333. doi: 10.1002/elps.200305844 Casaretto JA, El-Kereamy A, Zeng B, Stiegelmeyer SM, Chen X et al. (2016). Expression of OsMYB55 in maize activates stressresponsive genes and enhances heat and drought tolerance. BMC Genomics 17: 312. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2659-5
  3. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought- from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30: 239-264. doi: 10.1071/FP02076
  4. Chiang PK, Gordon RK, Tal J, Zeng GC, Doctor BP et al. (1996). S-Adenosylmethionine and methylation. FASEB Journal 10: 471-480. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.4.8647346 Chintakovid N, Maipoka M, Phaonakrop N, Mickelbart MV, Roytrakul S et al. (2017). Proteomic analysis of droughtresponsive proteins in rice reveals photosynthesis-related adaptations to drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 39 (10): 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11738-017-2532-4
  5. Cui S, Hu J, Guo S, Wang J, Cheng Y et al. (2012). Proteome analysis of Physcomitrella patens exposed to progressive dehydration and rehydration. Journal of Experimental Botany 63 (2): 711- 726. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err296 Faghani E, Gharechahi J, Komatsu S, Mirzaei M, Khavarinejad RA et al. (2015). Comparative physiology and proteomic analysis of two wheat geno