Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

The chromosomal evolution and analyses of Turkish Cousinia species

Pages
244–259
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Concerning the chromosome evolution of the Cousinia species, we concluded that merely dysploidy is effective within the genus and evolutionally a unipolar reduction goes on in the basic chromosome number in speciation (from 13 to 12).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Turkish Cousinia species were examined in point of chromosome number and morphology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As consistent with previous reports, the chromosome numbers are mostly 2n = 26 and have been determined also as 2n = 24 for only the members of Cynaroideae and Sphaerocephalae sections.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Concerning the chromosome evolution of the Cousinia species, we concluded that merely dysploidy is effective within the genus and evolutionally a unipolar reduction goes on in the basic chromosome number in speciation (from 13 to 12).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, Turkish Cousinia species were examined in point of chromosome number and morphology. To our knowledge, this work is the first comprehensive chromosomal study regarding Turkish Cousinia as a whole, especially for endemics. As consistent with previous reports, the chromosome numbers are mostly 2n = 26 and have been determined also as 2n = 24 for only the members of Cynaroideae and Sphaerocephalae sections. An interesting result of this paper is that there is not any polyploid species in this taxonomic group and all of them are diploids. Concerning the chromosome evolution of the Cousinia species, we concluded that merely dysploidy is effective within the genus and evolutionally a unipolar reduction goes on in the basic chromosome number in speciation (from 13 to 12). In terms of general chromosomal information, the chromosomes of the genus consist of metacentric and submetacentric types and they could be categorized in small category according to Lima De Faria classification (0.67–3.43). According to chromosomal indices used in this paper, while most species have symmetrical chromosomes, fewer have asymmetrical ones. From this point, it could be said that Cousinia stapfiana could be assessed as the most evolved taxa in karyomorphology according to the average of all indexes used in here. Besides, Cousinia bicolor, Cousinia birandiana, and Cousinia sintenisii are species having the most primitive chromosome within the genus.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUGAY, O., ERTUĞRUL, K., ULUKUŞ, D., DEMİRELMA, H., UYSAL, T., BOZKURT, M. (2022). The chromosomal evolution and analyses of Turkish Cousinia species. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 244–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/600727

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Afzal-Rafii Z (1980). Contribution a l’étude cytotaxonomique de quelques Cousinia d’Iran. Review of Biology and Ecology Mediterranean. 7: 6-14 (in French). Ahmad-Khanbeygi Z, Sheidai M, Attar F (2011). Morphometry and palynological study of genus Cousinia sect. Cousinia (Asteraceae) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 17 (2): 158-166.
  2. Atazadeh N, Sheidai M, Attar F, Koohdar F (2021). Molecular phylogeny and morphometric analyses in the genus Cousinia Cass. (Family Asteraceae), sections Cynaroideae Bunge and Platyacanthae Rech. f. Caryologia (Just Accepted) Cassini A (1827). Carlinées-Prototypes. Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles 47. Le mormant Paris, pp. 498-505 (in French). Davis PH (1975). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Vol.5, Edinburgh University Press,
  3. Edinburgh. Djamali M, Baumel A, Brewer S, Jackson ST, Kadereit JW et al. (2012). Ecological implications of Cousinia Cass. (Asteraceae) persistence through the last two glacial-interglacial cycles in the continental Middle East for the Irano-Turanian flora. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 172: 10-20. doi:10.1016/j. revpalbo.2012.01.005 Djavadi SB, Ghaffari SM (1999). Distribution and chromosome studies of Cousinia sect. Sphaerocephalae (Asteraceae) in Iran. The Iranian Journal of Botany 8: 49-54.
  4. Djavadi SB (2005). New or rare chromosome counts in 10 species of Cousinia from Iran (I). Rostaniha 6: 61-70.
  5. Djavadi SB (2007). New or rare chromosome counts in 10 species of Cousinia from Iran (II). Rostaniha 8: 19-27.
  6. Djavadi SB, Attar F (2010). New chromosome counts in the genus Cousinia (Asteraceae, Cardueae) from Iran. Willdenowia 40: 351-357. Fedorov AA (ed.) (1969). Khromosomnye chisla cvetkovykh rastenii [Chromosome numbers of flowering plants]. Leningrad: Nauka. Frodin DG (2004). History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 53(3): 753-766.
  7. Ghaffari SM (1984) [Reports]. In Löve Á (ed) Chromosome number reports LXXXIII. Taxon 33: 353. Ghaffari SM (1986). Chromosome number reports XCIII. Taxon 35: 897-903.
  8. Ghaffari SM (1987). Chromosome studies in some flowering plants of Iran. Revue de cytologie et de biologie végétales, Le Botaniste 10: 3-8.
  9. Ghaffari SM, Chariat-Panahi S (1985). Chromosome count of some angiosperms from Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany 3: 67-73.
  10. Ghaffari SM, Djavadi SB (1998). Chromosome studies and distribution of nine species of Cousinia section Stenocephalae (Asteraceae) in Iran. Bulletin de la Société neuchâteloise des sciences naturelles. 121: 61-68. Ghaffar