Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Chromosome numbers and genome size data on species of the genus Petrorhagia (Caryophyllaceae) from Turkey

Pages
134–141
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on available data, genome expansions in the genus seem to have occurred through different evolutionary mechanisms, such as polyploidy and differential repetitive DNA activation, evidencing contrasting genomic trajectories between closely related taxa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Genome size, i.e. the total amount of DNA in an unreplicated somatic nucleus is considered an important character in the biology of organisms, and it is especially relevant for land plants given the extraordinary diversity reported.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The presence of both basic chromosome numbers x = 15 and x = 13 is confirmed, the latter being restricted to the species P. hispidula and P. cretica.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on available data, genome expansions in the genus seem to have occurred through different evolutionary mechanisms, such as polyploidy and differential repetitive DNA activation, evidencing contrasting genomic trajectories between closely related taxa.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Genome size, i.e. the total amount of DNA in an unreplicated somatic nucleus is considered an important character in the biology of organisms, and it is especially relevant for land plants given the extraordinary diversity reported. Despite the continuous growth of data and the efforts aimed at increasing our understanding of plant genome size diversity, more data are needed to have an evenly representation across lineages. With this premise in mind, in this work, we investigated genome size, complemented with chromosome data in eight species of the genus Petrorhagia (Caryophyllaceae) from Turkey. Chromosome counts made indicate that the species studied are diploid except for one species, P. saxifraga, which is probably a tetraploid, based on previously published estimations of nuclear DNA contents. The presence of both basic chromosome numbers x = 15 and x = 13 is confirmed, the latter being restricted to the species P. hispidula and P. cretica. The counts carried out for the Turkish endemic species, in P. hispidula (2n = 26), P. pamphylica (2n = 30) and P. peroninii (2n = 30) represent novel data for the genus. Nuclear DNA contents ranged from 1.24 to 2.32 pg/2C (varying 1.87-fold). Based on available data, genome expansions in the genus seem to have occurred through different evolutionary mechanisms, such as polyploidy and differential repetitive DNA activation, evidencing contrasting genomic trajectories between closely related taxa.

🔖

Cite This Article

PELLICER, J., GARNATJE, T., AKTAŞ, K. (2022). Chromosome numbers and genome size data on species of the genus Petrorhagia (Caryophyllaceae) from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 134–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/600724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Aktaş K, Özdemir C, Altan Y, Baran P, Özkan M (2010a). Türkiye’de yayılış gösteren Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link (Caryophyllaceae) taksonlarının bazı ekolojik özellikleri. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi 3 (1): 79-93. Aktaş K, Altan Y, Özdemir C, Baran P, Garnatje T (2010b). Comparative pollen morphology of Turkish species of Petrorhagia (Caryophyllaceae) and its systematic implications. Biologia 65 (3): 444-450. doi:10.2478/s11756-010-0038-2 Aktaş K. (2012). Petrorhagia. In: Guner, A, Aslan S, Ekim, T, Vural, M.& Babac, MT.(Eds) Türkiye bitkileri listesi (damarlı bitkiler). [A Checklist of the Flora of Turkey (Vascular Plants)]. İstanbul: Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, pp. 351-352. Ball PW (1964). Petrorhagia L. In: Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. (Eds.) Flora Europaea, Vol
  2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 186-188. Ball PW, Heywood VH (1964). A revision of the genus Petrorhagia. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Botany 3: 121-172. Beaulieu JM, Smith SA, Leitch IJ (2010). On the tempo of genome Size evolution in angiosperms (J Suda, Ed.). Journal of Botany 2010: 989152. Boissier PE (1849). Diagnoses plantarum orientalum novarum, Ser. I, Part 8, Geneve, Leipzig. Boissier PE (1867). Flora Orientalis, Vol
  3. Amsterdam: A. Asher & Co B.V. Boissier PE (1888). Flora Orientalis, Supplementum. Genevae et Basileae: R. Buser. Böcher TW, Larsen K, Rahn K (1953). Experimental and cytological studies on plant species Kohlrauschia prolifera and Plantago coronopus. Hereditas 39: 289-304. Candolle AP de (1824). Prodromos Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis Vol. 1, Parisiis: Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Würtz. Celebioglu T, Favarger C (1993). Mediterranean chromosome number reports-3. In: Kamari G, Felber F, Garbari F. (Eds.). Flora Mediterranea 3: 323-373. Coode MJE, Cullen J (1967). Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link, In: Davis, P.H. (Ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol
  4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 179–242. Clapham AR, Tutin TG, Warburg EF (1962). Flora of the British Isles. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davis PH, Milli RR, Tan K (1988). Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands (Supplement 10). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Díaz Lifante Z, Parra Martín R (2013). Chromosome numbers are reported for plants collected during OPTIMA’s Iter Mediterraneum V to Morocco in 1992. Bocconea 26: 151-172. Doležel J, Bartoš J,