SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Application of low intensity mechanical vibrations for bone tissue maintenance and regeneration

Engin ÖZÇİVİCİ
Melis OLÇUM
Öznur BASKIN
Özge KARADAŞ
Pages
300–307
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Studies indicate that LIV signals are safe, anabolic, and anticatabolic for skeletal tissue and are of great significance in regenerative medicine applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Physical exercise is beneficial for bone tissue health, yet its usage is limited for preventing osteoporosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even though natural for the bone tissue from development to homeostasis, mechanical loads present with a multitude of physical parameters, including amplitude, duration, frequency, and distribution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Studies indicate that LIV signals are safe, anabolic, and anticatabolic for skeletal tissue and are of great significance in regenerative medicine applications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Physical exercise is beneficial for bone tissue health, yet its usage is limited for preventing osteoporosis. Even though natural for the bone tissue from development to homeostasis, mechanical loads present with a multitude of physical parameters, including amplitude, duration, frequency, and distribution. Utilizing the most beneficial parameters of mechanical loads may potentiate a nonpharmaceutical tool for biotechnology to prevent and treat bone loss related to aging, bedrest, sedentary lifestyles, weightlessness, and other diseases. Low intensity vibrations (LIVs) consist of mechanical loads with amplitudes smaller than loads prescribed by habitual activity, with a higher frequency. In this review, literature covering LIV signal application on bone tissue and cellular and molecular level is presented. Studies indicate that LIV signals are safe, anabolic, and anticatabolic for skeletal tissue and are of great significance in regenerative medicine applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇİVİCİ, E., OLÇUM, M., BASKIN, Ö., KARADAŞ, Ö. (2022). Application of low intensity mechanical vibrations for bone tissue maintenance and regeneration. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 300–307. https://ajindex.com/articles/600396

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andreoli A, Monteleone M, Van Loan M, Promenzio L, Tarantino U, De Lorenzo A (2001). Effects of different sports on bone density and muscle mass in highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 507–511.
  2. Asagiri M, Takayanagi H (2007). The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone 40: 251–264.
  3. Bacabac RG, Smit TH, Van Loon JJ, Doulabi BZ, Helder M, Klein Nulend J (2006). Bone cell responses to high-frequency vibration stress: does the nucleus oscillate within the cytoplasm? FASEB J 20: 858–864.
  4. Bergström I, Landgren B, Brinck J, Freyschuss B (2008). Physical training preserves bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with forearm fractures and low bone mineral density. Osteoporosis Int 19: 177–183.
  5. Bianchi E, Molteni R, Pardi R, Dubini G (2013). Microfluidics for in vitro biomimetic shear stress-dependent leukocyte adhesion assays. J Biomech 46: 276–283.
  6. Bonewald LF (2011). The amazing osteocyte. J Bone Miner Res 26: 229–238.
  7. Branemark R, Branemark P, Rydevik B, Myers RR (2001). Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 38: 175–182. Brouwers JE, van Rietbergen B, Ito K, Huiskes R (2010). Effects of vibration treatment on tibial bone of ovariectomized rats analyzed by in vivo micro‐CT. J Orthopaed Res 28: 62–69.
  8. Chan ME, Adler BJ, Green DE, Rubin CT (2012). Bone structure and B-cell populations, crippled by obesity, are partially rescued by brief daily exposure to low-magnitude mechanical signals. FASEB J 26: 4855–4863.
  9. Chan ME, Uzer G, Rubin CT (2013). The potential benefits and inherent risks of vibration as a non-drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 11: 36–44.
  10. Chow DHK, Leung KS, Qin L, Leung AHC, Cheung WH (2011). Low‐magnitude high‐frequency vibration (LMHFV) enhances bone remodeling in osteoporotic rat femoral fracture healing. J Orthopaed Res 29: 746–752.
  11. Chung SL, Leung KS, Cheung WH (2014). Low‐magnitude high‐ frequency vibration enhances gene expression related to callus formation, mineralization and remodeling during osteoporotic fracture healing in rats. J Orthopaed Res 32: 1572–1579.
  12. Colnot C (2009). Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration. J Bone Miner Res 24: 274–282. de Oliveira ML, Bergamaschi CT, Silva OL, Nonaka KO, Wang CC, Carvalho AB, Jorgetti V, Campos RR, Lazaretti-Castro M (2010). Mechanical vibration preserves bone structure in rats treated with glucocorticoids. Bon