Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

Characterization of proteinase inhibitor-II gene under OsRGLP2 promoter for salt stress in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana

Pages
494–502
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This comparative analysis of transgenic and wild-type seedlings allows us to suggest that PI-II gene activity can be upregulated via the OsRGLP2 promoter under osmotic stress conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Proteinase inhibitors in plants are mainly involved in conferring resistance against herbivores and pathogens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, transgenic tobacco plants were generated constitutively expressing the tomato proteinase inhibitor-II (PI-II) under control of the rice root germin-like protein 2 (OsRGLP2) promoter using Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This comparative analysis of transgenic and wild-type seedlings allows us to suggest that PI-II gene activity can be upregulated via the OsRGLP2 promoter under osmotic stress conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Proteinase inhibitors in plants are mainly involved in conferring resistance against herbivores and pathogens. However, their role in abiotic stress resistance has also been reported. Therefore, transgenic tobacco plants were generated constitutively expressing the tomato proteinase inhibitor-II (PI-II) under control of the rice root germin-like protein 2 (OsRGLP2) promoter using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. T1 transgenic seedlings were subjected to stress treatments with different concentrations of sodium chloride (NaCl) (100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM). Quantitative real-time PCR revealed considerable levels of expression and upregulation of PI-II in transgenic lines under salt stress. Considering the phenotypic effects, the transgenic seedlings showed better growth, higher chlorophyll content, higher proline contents, and higher average fresh weight when compared to the wild type. This comparative analysis of transgenic and wild-type seedlings allows us to suggest that PI-II gene activity can be upregulated via the OsRGLP2 promoter under osmotic stress conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAHMOOD, T., REHMAN, S., JØRGENSEN, B., RASMUSSEN, S. K. (2022). Characterization of proteinase inhibitor-II gene under OsRGLP2 promoter for salt stress in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 494–502. https://ajindex.com/articles/600306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ali Y, Aslam Z, Ashraf MY, Tahir GR (2004). Effect of salinity on chlorophyll concentration, leaf area, yield and yield components of rice genotypes grown under saline environment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 1: 221-225.
  2. Arnon DI (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24: 1-15.
  3. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205-207.
  4. Bryant J, Green TR, Gurusaddaiah T, Ryan CA (1976). Proteinase inhibitor II from potatoes: isolation and characterization of its protomer components. Biochemistry 15: 3418-3424.
  5. Cao FY, Yoshioka K, Desveaux D (2011). The roles of ABA in plantpathogen interactions. J Plant Res 124: 489-499.
  6. Delauney AJ, Verma DPS (1993). Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J 4: 215-223.
  7. Dombrowski JE (2003). Salt stress activation of wound-related genes in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 132: 2098-2107.
  8. Fujita M, Fujita Y, Maruyama K, Seki M, Hiratsu K, Ohme-Takagi M, Tran LS, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2004).
  9. A dehydration-induced NAC protein, RD26, is involved in a novel ABA-dependent stress-signaling pathway. Plant J 39: 863-876.
  10. Fujita M, Fujita Y, Noutoshi Y, Takahashi F, Narusaka Y, YamaguchiShinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2006). Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9: 436-442.
  11. Gaddour K, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Lara P, Isabel-Lamoneda I, Díaz I, Carbonero P (2001). A constitutive cystatin-encoding gene from barley (Icy) responds differentially to abiotic stimuli. Plant Mol Biol 45: 599-608.
  12. Gosti F, Bertauche N, Vartanian N, Giraudat J (1995). Abscisic aciddependent and-independent regulation of gene expression by progressive drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 246: 10-18.
  13. Gustafson G, Ryan CA (1976). Specificity of protein turnover in tomato leaves. Accumulation of proteinase inhibitors, induced with the wound hormone, PIIF. J Biol Chem 251: 7004-7010.
  14. Haq SK, Khan RH (2003). Characterization of a proteinase inhibitor from Cajanus cajan (L.). J Protein Chem 22: 543-554.
  15. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT (1985). A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227: 1229-1231.
  16. Huang Y, Xiao B, Xiong L (2007). Characterization of a stress responsive proteinase inhibitor gene with positive effect in improving drought