Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the genetic diversity of pomegranate accessions from Turkey using new microsatellite markers

Pages
142–153
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present study provides essential information to devise a pomegranatecore germplasm collection without duplication of plant material, to sustainably manage pomegranate breeding programs, and toestablish conservation strategies for preserving local pomegranate genetic resources.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey has many valuable genetic resources for pomegranate; however, there have not been many studies on the identificationand characterization of these important genetic resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:New microsatellite markers were used to characterize a set of 78 pomegranateaccessions from Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present study provides essential information to devise a pomegranatecore germplasm collection without duplication of plant material, to sustainably manage pomegranate breeding programs, and toestablish conservation strategies for preserving local pomegranate genetic resources.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Turkey has many valuable genetic resources for pomegranate; however, there have not been many studies on the identificationand characterization of these important genetic resources. New microsatellite markers were used to characterize a set of 78 pomegranateaccessions from Turkey. Using six SSR primers, a total of 41 alleles were characterized with an average of 4.6 alleles per locus andmean probability of identity (PI) value of 0.366. These data indicated a high level of polymorphism in pomegranate germplasm. Fivesynonymous groups could be detected among 30 accessions. This microsatellite-based key is a first step towards a database for markerassisted identification of pomegranate accessions in Turkey. The present study provides essential information to devise a pomegranatecore germplasm collection without duplication of plant material, to sustainably manage pomegranate breeding programs, and toestablish conservation strategies for preserving local pomegranate genetic resources.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜL, A., ÇALIŞKAN, O., BAYAZIT, S., ÖKTEM, M. (2022). Evaluation of the genetic diversity of pomegranate accessions from Turkey using new microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 142–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/599336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alamuti MK, Zeinalabedini M, Derazmahalleh MM, Shojaie TR, Irandoost HP, Zahravi M, Vazifehshenas M, Ebrahimi MA, Nekouei SMK, Salekdeh GH et al. (2012). Extensive genetic diversity in Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) germplasm revealed by microsatellite markers. Sci Hortic 146: 104-114.
  2. Bashalkhanov S, Pandey M, Rajora OP (2009). A simple method for estimation genetic diversity in large populations from finite sample sizes. BMC Genetics 84: 1-10.
  3. Bellini E, Giordani E (1998). Descriptor List for Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Project on “Minor Fruit Tree Species Conservation”: RESGEN29. Florence, Italy: Horticulture Department, University of Florence. Ben-Simhon Z, Judeinstein S, Trainin T, Harel-Beja R, Bar-Ya’akov I, Borochov-Neori H, Holland H (2015). A “white” anthocyaninless pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) caused by an insertion in the coding region of the leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX; ANS) gene. PLoS One 10: e0142777. Berinyuy JE, Fontem DA, Focho DA, Schippers RR (2002). Morphological diversity of Solanum scabrum accessions in Cameroon. Plant Genet Res News 131: 42-48.
  4. Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, CavalliSforza LL (1994). High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368: 455-457.
  5. Boz Y, Bakir M, Çelikkol BP, Kazan K, Yilmaz F, Çakir B, Aslantaş S, Söylemezoğlu G, Yaşasin AS, Özer C et al. (2011). Genetic characterization of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) germplasm from Southeast Anatolia by SSR markers. Vitis 50: 99-106.
  6. Caliskan O, Bayazit S (2012). Phytochemical and antioxidant attributes of autochthonous Turkish pomegranates. Sci Hortic 147: 81-88.
  7. Caliskan O, Bayazit S (2013). Morpho-pomological and chemical diversity of pomegranate accessions grown in eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. J Agr Sci Tech 15: 1449-1460.
  8. Caliskan O, Polat AA, Celikkol P, Bakir M (2012). Molecular characterization of autochthonous Turkish fig accessions. Span J Agric Res 10: 130-140. Currὸ S, Caruso M, Distefano G, Gentile A, La Malfa S (2010). New microsatellite loci for pomegranate, Punica granatum (Lythraceae). Am J Bot 97: 58-60.
  9. Drogoudi PD, Tsipouridis C, Michailidis Z (2005). Physical and chemical characteristics of pomegranates. Hort Sci 40: 1200- 1203. Ebrahimi S, Sayed-Tabatabaei BE, Sharifnabi B (2010) Microsatellite isolation and characterization in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Iran J Biotechnol 8: 156-163.
  10. Ellegren H (2004). Microsatellites: simple sequences wi