Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

Some growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of black and hybrid poplar clones under water stress

Pages
348–356
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, theI-214 poplar clone may have the potential to be used in drought areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of water stress on some growth and chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters were investigated in two native blackpoplar (Populus nigra L.) clones (Kocabey and Gazi) and in two hybrid poplar (Populus × euramericana (Dode) Guinier) clones (I-214and I-45/51) to determine which among the four clones is the best adapted to water-stress conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the applied watering regimes, the predawn water potential (ψpd) of seedlings was maintainedat about –0.3, –0.9, and –1.6 MPa in control, moderate, and severe water-stress treatments during the experiment, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, theI-214 poplar clone may have the potential to be used in drought areas.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The effects of water stress on some growth and chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters were investigated in two native blackpoplar (Populus nigra L.) clones (Kocabey and Gazi) and in two hybrid poplar (Populus × euramericana (Dode) Guinier) clones (I-214and I-45/51) to determine which among the four clones is the best adapted to water-stress conditions. The potted seedlings were grownunder three watering regimes. As a result of the applied watering regimes, the predawn water potential (ψpd) of seedlings was maintainedat about –0.3, –0.9, and –1.6 MPa in control, moderate, and severe water-stress treatments during the experiment, respectively. Droughttreatment had significant effects on the morphology and growth characteristics of the clones but had generally insignificant effects onsurvival and the photochemical activity of photosystem II (PSII). Results obtained from the present study demonstrate that I-214 wasthe most successful in terms of its higher root/shoot ratio (Rs), maximum fluorescence yield (Fm), maximum quantum efficiency of PSII(Fv/Fm) values, and lower number of leaves among the examined four poplar clones under drought stress conditions. Consequently, theI-214 poplar clone may have the potential to be used in drought areas.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEMERCİ, A., ÇİÇEK, N., EKMEKÇİ, Y., KAŞKO, Y. A., ÖZYÜREK, E., KARAHAN, F. A. (2022). Some growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of black and hybrid poplar clones under water stress. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 348–356. https://ajindex.com/articles/599326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bacon MA (1999). Biomechanical control of leaf expansion. Plant Growth Regu 29: 101-112.
  2. Baker NR (1991). A possible role for photosystem II in environmental perturbations of photosynthesis. Physiol Plant 81: 563-570.
  3. Baquedano FJ, Valladares F, Castillo FJ (2008). Phenotypic plasticity blurs ecotypic divergence in the response of Quercus coccifera and Pinus halepensis to water stress. Eur J For Res 127: 495-506.
  4. Björkman O, Demming B (1987). Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plant plants of diverse origins. Planta 170: 489-504.
  5. Blum A (2011). Drought resistance–is it really a complex trait? Funct Plant Biol 38: 753-757.
  6. Bota J, Flexas J, Medrano H (2001). Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grape vine cultivars. Ann Appl Biol 138: 353-361.
  7. Boureima S, Oukarroum A, Diouf M, Cisse N, Van Damme P (2012). Screening for drought tolerance in mutant germplasm of sesame (Sesamum indicum) probing by chlorophyll a fluorescence. Environ Exp Bot 81: 37-43.
  8. Brignolas F, Thierry C, Guerrier G, Boudouresque E (2000). Compared water stress response of two Populus x euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp. Ann For Sci 57: 261-266.
  9. Chaves MM, Osório J, Pereira JS (2004). Water use efficiency and photosynthesis. In: MA Bacon, editor. Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing/CNR Press, pp. 42-74.
  10. Çiçek N, Arslan Ö, Çulha-Erdal Ş, Eyidoğan F, Ekmekçi Y (2015). Are the photosynthetic performance indexes and the drought factor index satisfactory selection criterion for stress? Fresen Environ Bull 24: 4190-4198.
  11. Colom MR, Vazzana C (2003). Photosynthesis and PS II functionality of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants. Environ Exp Bot 49: 135-144.
  12. Cornic G (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci 5: 187-188.
  13. Flexas J, Bota J, Escalona JM, Sampol B, Medrano H (2002). Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomal and mesophyll limitations. Funct Plant Biol 29: 461-471.
  14. Hopkins WG (1995). Introduction to Plant Physiology. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons. IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. Işık F, Toplu F (2004). Variati