Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6

Fifth Year Performance of Morphologically Graded Cedrus libani Seedlings in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey

Pages
483–491
Publication Date
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results suggest that initial seedling morphology is not a good predictor of field survival but root collar diameter is a good indicator of the growth potential of C. libani seedlings after planting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of morphological characteristics on seedling performance were studied in Cedrus libani seedlings at 3 locations in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some 2+0 seedlings were morphologically graded according to height and root collar diameter sizes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results suggest that initial seedling morphology is not a good predictor of field survival but root collar diameter is a good indicator of the growth potential of C. libani seedlings after planting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cedrus libani · Seedling quality · Morphological characteristic

Abstract

The effects of morphological characteristics on seedling performance were studied in Cedrus libani seedlings at 3 locations in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey. Some 2+0 seedlings were morphologically graded according to height and root collar diameter sizes. The seedlings were divided into 5 height categories and each height category was divided into small and large root collar diameter subcategories. The morphologically graded seedlings were planted at 3 locations. After 5 growing seasons, the mean survival of the seedlings planted in Ankara, Eskişehir and Konya locations was 84.4%, 77.9% and 54.7%, respectively. The mean height of seedlings planted in Ankara, Eskişehir and Konya was 78.5, 51.8 and 48.7 cm, respectively. Survival and height growth of graded seedlings showed significant differences among the locations, which might be a reflection of differences in climatic and physiographic conditions among the locations. The initial height and root collar diameter of seedlings had no effect on survival. Only root collar diameter had a significant effect on height growth. Initial height differences among different sized stocks were still significant after 5 years, but had not expanded. Our results suggest that initial seedling morphology is not a good predictor of field survival but root collar diameter is a good indicator of the growth potential of C. libani seedlings after planting. This study indicated that the physiological characteristics of seedlings have a strong influence on seedling survival potential.

Özet

The effects of morphological characteristics on seedling performance were studied in Cedrus libani seedlings at 3 locations in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey. Some 2+0 seedlings were morphologically graded according to height and root collar diameter sizes. The seedlings were divided into 5 height categories and each height category was divided into small and large root collar diameter subcategories. The morphologically graded seedlings were planted at 3 locations. After 5 growing seasons, the mean survival of the seedlings planted in Ankara, Eskişehir and Konya locations was 84.4%, 77.9% and 54.7%, respectively. The mean height of seedlings planted in Ankara, Eskişehir and Konya was 78.5, 51.8 and 48.7 cm, respectively. Survival and height growth of graded seedlings showed significant differences among the locations, which might be a reflection of differences in climatic and physiographic conditions among the locations. The initial height and root collar diameter of seedlings had no effect on survival. Only root collar diameter had a significant effect on height growth. Initial height differences among different sized stocks were still significant after 5 years, but had not expanded. Our results suggest that initial seedling morphology is not a good predictor of field survival but root collar diameter is a good indicator of the growth potential of C. libani seedlings after planting. This study indicated that the physiological characteristics of seedlings have a strong influence on seedling survival potential.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEMERCİ, A. (2005). Fifth Year Performance of Morphologically Graded Cedrus libani Seedlings in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6, 483–491. https://ajindex.com/articles/179851

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Akgül, E. and A. Yılmaz. 1987. Doğal yayılıfl alanı dıflında yapılan ağaçlandırmalarda yörenin ekolojik özellikleri ile Toros sedirinin (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) geliflimi arasındaki iliflkiler (Relationship between characteristics of Taurus cedar and the ecological properties of reforestation areas outside the natural stands). Ormancılık Arafltırma Enstitüsü Yayınları. Teknik Bülten Serisi: 188, Ankara.
  2. Atalay, İ. 1987. Sedir (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) Ormanlarının Yayılıfl Gösterdiği Alanlar Ve Yakın Çevresinin Genel Ekolojik Özellikleri ile Sedir Tohum Transfer Rejyonlaması (General Ecological Properties of Natural Occurrence Areas of Cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) Forests and Regioning of Seed Transfer of Cedar in Turkey). Orman Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını. Yayın No: 663, Ankara.
  3. Atalay, İ. 1990. Türkiye’de sedir (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) tohum transfer rejyonlaması (Regioning of seed transfer of cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) in Turkey). In: Proceedings of the International Cedar Symposium, Ormancılık Arafltırma Enstitüsü Yayını. Muhtelif Yayın No: 59, Ankara, pp. 166-179.
  4. Bilir, N. 1997. Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesinde Toros Sediri (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) Orijin Denemeleri Fidanlık Aflaması. Master Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, p. 90. Bilir, N. 2002. Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde Kurulan Toros Sediri (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) Orijin Denemelerinin İlk Sonuçları. Doktora Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, p. 98. Bacon, G.J., P.J. Hawkins and D. Jermyn 1977. Morphological grading studies with 1-0 slash pine seedlings. Australian Forestry, 40: 293-303.
  5. Boydak, M., H.F. Bozkufl and C.Ü. Alptekin. 1990. Türkiye’de özellikle doğal yayılıfl alanları dıflındaki sedir (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) ağaçlandırmalarının silvikültürel açıdan değerlendirilmesi (Silvicultural evaluation of the Cedrus libani plantations located out of ıts occurrence in Turkey). In: Proceedings of the International Cedar Symposium, Ormancılık Arafltırma Enstitüsü Yayını. Muhtelif Yayın No: 59, Ankara, pp. 180-192.
  6. Boydak, M. and H. Dirik. 1990. Lübnan Sediri (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) fidanlarında su stresi ile koflullandırmanın dikim sonrasındaki su durumu ve kök rejenarasyonuna etkileri (The effects of preconditioning by restricted watering on the water status and root regeneration of transplanted Cedrus libani plants). In: Proceedings of the International Cedar Symposium, Ormancılık Arafltırma Enstitüsü Yayını. Muhtelif Yayın No: 59, Ankara, pp. 19