Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Effects of growing site parameters on vessel elements of Quercus ilex through Turkey and evaluating in respect of forestry

Pages
599–616
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that, while vessel element lengths are almost stable in all regions, the most changeable vessel element feature is the vessel frequency in different regions of Q. ilex.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to find the effects of different growing site conditions on trees with the vessel features in the woods of Quercus ilex L. growing in different regions through Turkey, and to evaluate the results in respect of forestry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 102 wood samples were collected from 102 sampling plots (as 20 m × 10 m plots) in 9 distribution areas in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that, while vessel element lengths are almost stable in all regions, the most changeable vessel element feature is the vessel frequency in different regions of Q. ilex.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to find the effects of different growing site conditions on trees with the vessel features in the woods of Quercus ilex L. growing in different regions through Turkey, and to evaluate the results in respect of forestry. A total of 102 wood samples were collected from 102 sampling plots (as 20 m × 10 m plots) in 9 distribution areas in Turkey. Environmental, climate and stand data were obtained for each plot. Standard wood anatomical studies were performed. The results show that, while vessel element lengths are almost stable in all regions, the most changeable vessel element feature is the vessel frequency in different regions of Q. ilex. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the mesomorphy and xeromorphy ratios revealed that a total of 15 sites fell into Group 1 (14.71%- very humid), 39 sites (38.24%-humid) into Group 2 and 48 sites (47.06%-dry) into Group 3. The ratios of dry sites are 29.63% in Black sea region, 45.71% in Marmara region and 60% in Aegean region; Black Sea Region promotes more mesomorphic wood formation, those in the Aegean region force xeromorphic wood formation in general. The stands of Q. ilex mixed with Pinus brutia are drier and produce negative correlation with temperature and positive correlations with precipitation. Increasing tree cover, tree height and stem diameter promote wider vessel element diameters and lower number of vessels per square mm. In the individuals of Q. ilex growing on the mountain ridges of Muğla, Davutlar National Park and its around and on the shallow soils are the driest conditions, and safety is more prominent than efficiency in water transport. In the lower elevations and on the deep soils, efficiency in water transport becomes more prominent than safety. Due to its mesomorphic vessel features in lowland humid sites, Q. ilex may be planted in lowlands and humid sites through Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKEMİK, Ü., SEVGİ, O., YILMAZ, O. Y., GENÇ, S., SELVİ, E., YILMAZ, H., SEVGİ, E., AKARSU, F. (2022). Effects of growing site parameters on vessel elements of Quercus ilex through Turkey and evaluating in respect of forestry. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 599–616. https://ajindex.com/articles/599091

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abrantes J, Campelo F, García-González I, Nabais C (2013). Environmental control of vessel traits in Quercus ilex under Mediterranean climate: relating xylem anatomy to function. Trees 27 (3): 656-662.
  2. Akkemik Ü, Yaman B (2012). Wood Anatomy of Eastern Mediterranean Species. Germany: Kessel Publishing House. Akkemik Ü, Efe A, Kaya Z, Demir D (2007). Wood anatomy endemic Rhamnus species in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. IAWA Journal 28 (3): 301-310.
  3. Baas P, Schweingruber FH (1987). Ecological trends in the wood anatomy of trees, shrubs and climbers from Europe. IAWA Journal 8 (3): 245-274.
  4. Balzano A, Battipaglia G, Cherubini P, De Micco V (2020). Xylem Plasticity in Pinus pinaster and Quercus ilex Growing at Sites with Different Water Availability in the Mediterranean Region: Relations between Intra-Annual Density Fluctuations and Environmental Conditions. Forests 11 (4): 379. Balzano A, Cufar K, De Micco V (2021). Xylem and phloem formation dynamics in Quercus ilex L. at a dry site in southern Italy. Forests 12 (2): 188. Barbeta, A, Peñuelas J (2016). Sequence of plant responses to droughts of different timescales: lessons from holm oak (Quercus ilex) forests. Plant Ecology & Diversity 9 (4): 321–338.
  5. Campelo F, Gutiérrez E, Freitas H, García-González I (2010). Vessel features of Quercus ilex L. growing under Mediterranean climate have a better climatic signal than tree-ring width. Trees 24 (3): 463-470.
  6. Campelo F, Gutierrez E, Ribas M, Nabais C, Freitas H (2007). Relationships between climate and double rings in Quercus ilex from northeast Spain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 1915-1923.
  7. Carlquist S (1977). Ecological factors in wood evolution: A floristic approach. American Journal of Botany 64 (7): 887-896.
  8. Carlquist S (1988). Comparative Wood Anatomy: Systematic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Aspects of Dicotyledon Wood. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Christophe P, Carcaillet C, Mhamedi M (1997). Determination of the natural mortality age of an Holm Oak (Quercus ilex L.) stand in Corsica (Mediterranean Island). Acta Oecologica 18 (5): 519- 530. Cihan C, Akkemik Ü (2013). Ecological wood anatomy of some maquis species naturally grow in both Mediterranean and Black Sea Regions of Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science 1 (1): 20-37.
  9. Conrad O, Bechtel B, Bock M, Dietrich, H., Fischer E et al. (2015). System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions 8: 2271-2312.
  10. Corcuera L, Camarero JJ, Gil