SavedAdd your journal

Journals / TRT Akademi / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 13

Artificial Intelligence in Communication Studies: An Investigation on Studies Between 1982-2021

İletişim Çalışmalarında Yapay Zekâ: 1982-2021 Yılları Arasındaki Çalışmalara Yönelik Bir İnceleme

Hikmet TOSYALI
Pages
680–699
Publication Date
2022-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it is suggested that the results regarding literature obsolescence and core journals would contribute to the creation of subscriptions and journal collections in libraries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores the profile of media and communication studies on artificial intelligence and presents a perspective on the general structure of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 459 scientific studies published between 1982 and 2021, which have been increasing even further since 2016, were examined via bibliometric data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is suggested that the results regarding literature obsolescence and core journals would contribute to the creation of subscriptions and journal collections in libraries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yapay Zekâ · Makine Öğrenmesi · Medya

Abstract

This study explores the profile of media and communication studies on artificial intelligence and presents a perspective on the general structure of the literature. In this study, 459 scientific studies published between 1982 and 2021, which have been increasing even further since 2016, were examined via bibliometric data. The country that published the most was the USA with 25.1%. Turkey ranked 28th among 54 countries with four publications. Two hundred sixty-seven article publications were distributed in 96 different journals. By testing the compatibility of this distribution with Bradford’s Law, eight core journals meeting the needs of communication literature on artificial intelligence, were identified. New Media & Society ranked first on this list. Topics covered in the studies focused on journalism, natural language processing, human-robot interaction, social media bots, public relations and advertising. The most frequently used concepts in abstracts and keywords were “automated journalism,” “computational journalism,” “robot journalism,” “ethics,” “fake news.” The most frequently cited journal was Digital Journalism. The half-life value of cited publications was seven years. The results revealed the artificial intelligence trends in communication studies and the general structure of the communication literature. In addition, it is suggested that the results regarding literature obsolescence and core journals would contribute to the creation of subscriptions and journal collections in libraries.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, yapay zekâyı konu alan medya ve iletişim çalışmalarının profilini keşfetmek ve konuyla ilgili literatürün genel yapısına ilişkin bir perspektif sunmak amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada, 1982 ile 2021 yılları arasında yayımlanan 459 bilimsel çalışma bibliyometrik veriler ile incelenmiştir. 2016 yılından itibaren çalışmaların sayısı her yıl artmaktadır. En çok yayın yapan ülke %25,1 ile Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’dir. Türkiye dört yayın ile 54 ülke arasında 28. sıradadır. Makale türündeki 267 yayın 96 farklı dergiye dağılmaktadır. Bu dağılımın Bradford Yasası’na uygunluğu test edilerek yapay zekâ konusunda iletişim literatürünün ihtiyacını karşılayan sekiz çekirdek dergi tespit edilmiştir. New Media & Society birinci sıradadır. Çalışmalarda ele alınan konular gazetecilik, doğal dil işleme, insan-robot etkileşimi, sosyal medya botları, halkla ilişkiler ve reklamcılık konularında yoğunlaşmaktadır. Özet metinlerde ve anahtar kelimelerde en sık kullanılan kavramlar, “otomatik gazetecilik”, “hesaplamalı gazetecilik”, “robot gazetecilik”,

🔖

Cite This Article

TOSYALI, H. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Communication Studies: An Investigation on Studies Between 1982-2021. TRT Akademi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 13, 680–699. https://ajindex.com/articles/598964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akay, E. Ç., Soydan, T. Y., & Gacar, B. K. (2020). Machine learning and economics: Bibliometric analysis. PressAcademia Procedia (PAP), 12, 104-109. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1367 Al, U., & Tonta, Y. (2004). Atıf analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar [Citation analysis: Sources cited in dissertations completed at Hacettepe University Department of Librarianship]. Information World/Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1), 19-47.
  2. Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2018). Objects, metrics and practices: An inquiry into the programmatic advertising ecosystem. In U. Schultze, M. Aanestad, M. Mähring, C. Østerlund, & K. Riemer (Eds.), Living with Monsters? Social Implications of Algorithmic Phenomena, Hybrid Agency, and the Performativity of Technology. IS&O 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (pp. 110-123).
  3. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04091-8_9 Binbaşıoğlu, H. (2020). Akıllı turizm üzerine bibliyometrik bir literatür taraması [A bibliometric literature review on smart tourism]. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 8(4), 2825-2847. doi:10.21325/jotags.2020.740 Busch, O. (2016). The programmatic advertising principle. In O. Busch (Ed.), Programmatic Advertising (pp. 3-15).
  4. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25023-6_1 Calvo Rubio, L. M., & Ufarte Ruiz, M. J. (2021). Artificial intelligence and journalism: Systematic review of scientific production in Web of Science and Scopus (2008-2019). Communication & Society, 34(2), 159-176.
  5. Caswell, D., & Dörr, K. (2018). Automated journalism 2.0: Event-driven narratives. Journalism Practice, 12(4), s. 477-496. doi:10.1080/17512786.2017.1320773 Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Retrieved from https://documentserver.uhasselt.be//handle/1942/587
  6. Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 476-483. Retrieved from http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v4p476y1979-80.pdf
  7. Gökkurt, Ö. (1994).
  8. Enformetri, Bradford Yasası ve citation indeks [Informetrics, Bradford’s Law and citation index]. Turkish Librarianship/Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 8(1), 26-30.
  9. Kocakoç, İ. D., Kantarcı, S., İyilikçi, V., & Başok, B. İ. (2021). COVID-19 ile ilişikili yapay zeka araştırmalarının veri bilimi yöntemleriyle bibliyometrik analizi [Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence studies rela