Journals / Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Modern büyüme teorilerinin ilham kaynağı olarak adam smith'in ekonomik büyüme ile ilgili fikirleri

The sentiments of adam smith relating to economic growth as an inspirer to modern growth theories

Pages
29–48
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even if we are not on the same wave with Smith, it is still very important to review Smith’s views on the determinants of economic growth in order to design better economic and political environment for economic agents to increase wealth of nations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The determinants of wealth of nations have always been an interesting issue for policy makers and economists.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In economics, one of the most important subjects is to increase economic growth and welfare of society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even if we are not on the same wave with Smith, it is still very important to review Smith’s views on the determinants of economic growth in order to design better economic and political environment for economic agents to increase wealth of nations.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The determinants of wealth of nations have always been an interesting issue for policy makers and economists. In economics, one of the most important subjects is to increase economic growth and welfare of society. As one of the most important political economists, Adam Smith analyzed the dynamics of wealth of nations and welfare of individuals and societies. In this study, we mainly focused Smith’s views on the determinants of economic growth. It is clear that modern economic growth theory has been still benefited from the Smith’s views on the economic growth which are division of labour, education, human capital, learning by doing, increasing returns to scale, technological change, externalities, institutional factors such as global free-competitive market economy, the role of government etc. Even if we are not on the same wave with Smith, it is still very important to review Smith’s views on the determinants of economic growth in order to design better economic and political environment for economic agents to increase wealth of nations.

Özet

Ulusların zenginliğini belirleyen faktörler, politika yapıcıları ve iktisatçıların ilgisini her zaman çekmiştir. İktisat biliminde en önemli konulardan biri, iktisadi büyümeyi ve toplumun refahını arttırmaktır. Bilindiği üzere, Adam Smith en önemli politik iktisatçılardan biri olarak, bireylerin ve toplumların refahının ve ulusların zenginliğinin dinamiklerini incelemiştir. Bu çalışmada, Smith’in iktisadi büyümenin belirleyicileri üzerindeki görüşlerine odaklanılmıştır. Açıktır ki modern büyüme teorileri hâlâ Smith’in iktisadi büyüme üzerindeki görüşlerinden yararlanmaktadır. Bunlar arasında, işbölümü ve uzmanlaşma, eğitim, beşeri sermaye, yaparak öğrenme, teknolojik değişim, dışsallıklar, küresel serbest rekabetçi ekonomi yapısı ve devletin rolü gibi kurumsal faktörler sayılabilir. Smith ile aynı düşüncede olunmasa bile, Smith’in ekonomik büyümenin belirleyicileri üzerine görüşlerini yeniden gözden geçirmek, iktisadi birimlere daha iyi ekonomik ve politik bir çalışma iklimi tasarlayarak refahlarını arttırmak için hâlâ büyük önem arzetmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇAK, A. (2022). Modern büyüme teorilerinin ilham kaynağı olarak adam smith'in ekonomik büyüme ile ilgili fikirleri. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 29–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/598713

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Adelman, Irma, (1961), Theories of Economic Growth and Development. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  2. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1992), “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60.2. 323-351.
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1962), “The Economic Implications of Learning By Doing”, Review of Economic Studies, V. XXIX. Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003),
  4. Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
  5. Cass, D. (1965), “Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol.32, No.3, pp.233- 240. Domar, E. D. (1946), “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth and Employment”, E.M, V. 14. Dome, T. (1994), History of Economic Theory: A Critical Introduction, Edwar Elgar Publishing. Foley D.K. and Michl T.R. (1999),
  6. Growth and Distribution, Harvard University Press.
  7. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  8. Hahn, F.H. and R.C.O., Matthews, (1964), “ The Theory of Economic Growth: A Survey” The Economic Journal, 74 (296): 779-902.
  9. Hamberg, D.(1971),
  10. Models of Economic Growth, New York: Harper & Row. Harrod, R. F. (1939), “ An Essay In Dynamic Theory”, Economic Journal, V. XLIX. March 1939.
  11. Hutchison, T. (1976), “Adam Smith and The Wealth of Nations” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1776: The Revolution in Social Thought pp. 507-528 The University of Chicago Press.
  12. Koopmans, T.C. (1965), “On the Concept of Optimal Growth” Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale Unv. Paper.238, http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cp/p02a/p0238.pdf, accessed 10/05/2005
  13. Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3-42.
  14. Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1993), “Making A Miracle”, Econometrica, 61(2): 251-272.
  15. Marx, K. (1849), Capital, Vol.III, ElecBook Classics, London, UK., 1998.
  16. Mill, J.S. (1848), Principles of Political Economy, William J.Ashley,ed. (1909), 7th edit. Ramsey, F.P. (1928), “Mathematical Theory of Saving”, Economic Journal, 38: 543-559.
  17. Ricardo, D. (1817), On The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation,.John Murray, 1821, 3th Edt. Michigan Unv. Romer, P.M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94.5. 1002-1037.
  18. Romer, P.M. (1987), “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization”, American Economic Review, 77(2): 56-62.
  19. Romer, P.M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 71-101.
  20. Romer, P.M. (1994), “The