SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Teknik Dergi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5

Structural and Non-Structural Countermeasures and Awareness Studies After the Tsunami Disaster: Case of Japan

Tsunami Afeti Sonrası Yapısal ve Yapısal Olmayan Önlemler ve Farkındalık Çalışmaları: Japonya Örneği

Ahmet Cevdet YALÇINER
Ceren ÖZER SÖZDİNLER
Taro ARIKAWA
Hasan Gökhan GÜLER
Pages
8605–8629
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, observations from two field surveys conducted after five years following the tsunami event, focusing on structural and non-structural countermeasures in addition to disaster management and creation of disaster awareness studies are presented in details, and current measures in Turkey are also discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tsunami generated by the earthquake with a magnitude of 9.0 on March, 11, 2011 caused a high number of casualties and significant economic loss.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Planning and reconstruction studies following the 2011 Tsunami in Japan are important examples of countermeasures to be taken against tsunamis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, observations from two field surveys conducted after five years following the tsunami event, focusing on structural and non-structural countermeasures in addition to disaster management and creation of disaster awareness studies are presented in details, and current measures in Turkey are also discussed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tsunami generated by the earthquake with a magnitude of 9.0 on March, 11, 2011 caused a high number of casualties and significant economic loss. Planning and reconstruction studies following the 2011 Tsunami in Japan are important examples of countermeasures to be taken against tsunamis. In this study, observations from two field surveys conducted after five years following the tsunami event, focusing on structural and non-structural countermeasures in addition to disaster management and creation of disaster awareness studies are presented in details, and current measures in Turkey are also discussed.

Özet

11 Mart 2011 tarihinde gerçekleşen 9.0 şiddetindeki depremin yarattığı tsunami, Japonya’nındoğu kıyısı boyunca çok sayıda can kaybına ve ciddi hasara yol açmıştır. 2011 Tsunamisi’ninardından Japonya’da yapılan planlama ve yeniden yapım çalışmaları alınması gerekenönlemlere önemli bir örnek teşkil etmektedir. Bu çalışmada afetin beş yıl ardından bölgeyeyapılan iki farklı saha araştırma gezisinde gözlemlenen yapısal ve yapısal olmayan önlemlerile afet yönetimi ve afet farkındalığı yaratma çalışmaları ayrıntılarıyla sunulmuş veTürkiye’deki mevcut çalışmalar tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINER, A. C., SÖZDİNLER, C. Ö., ARIKAWA, T., GÜLER, H. G. (2022). Structural and Non-Structural Countermeasures and Awareness Studies After the Tsunami Disaster: Case of Japan. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5, 8605–8629. https://ajindex.com/articles/596574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Yalçıner, A.C., Synolakis, C.E., Alpar, B., Borrero, J., Altınok, Y., Imamura, F., Tinti, S., Ersoy, Ş., Kuran, U., Pamukçu, S., Kanoğlu, U., Field Surveys and Modeling of the 1999 İzmit Tsunami. ITS 2011
  2. Proceed., Seattle, USA, 2001.
  3. Altinok, Y., Tinti, S., Alpar, B., Yalciner, A. C., Ersoy, Ş., Bortolucci, Armigliato, A., The Tsunami of August 17, 1999 in Izmit Bay. Nat. Hazards, Vol. 24, 133-146, 2001.
  4. ASTARTE Ekibi, Report on Preparedness Skills, Resources and Attitudes within the Communities – Deliverable 9.7, ASTARTE Project Deliverables, 2017.
  5. Kuzucu, K., Osmanlı Döneminde Afet Yönetimine Dönük Bir Girişim: 1892 Tarihli Arama Kurtarma Örgütü: Heyet-i Tahlisiye. Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Eğitim Bil. Ve Sos. Bil. Kong. Bild., Ankara, 2016.
  6. Ozaki, T., JMA’s Tsunami Warning for the 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami Warning Improvement Plan. J. Disaster Res.7(sp), 439–445, 2012. [45] Madran, E., Kent Belleğinin Oluşumunda Mimarlık Yapıtları. Mimarlık, 298, 2001.
  7. Arikawa, T., Tomita, T. Development of High Precision Tsunami Runup Calculation Method Based on a Hierarchical Simulation, J. Dis. Research. Vol 11, 639-646, 2016
  8. Yamazaki, Y., Kowalik, Z., Cheung, K. F., Depth-Integrated, Non-Hydrostatic Model for Wave Breaking and Runup. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 61(5), 473–497, 2009.
  9. Baba, T., Takahashi, N., Kaneda, Y., Inazawa, Y., Kikkajin, M., Tsunami Inundation Modeling of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake using Three-Dimensional Building data for Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Tsunami Events and Lessons Learned: Ecological and Social Sig., ed.: Kontar, Y. A., Fandino, V. S., Takahashi, T., Springer, 2014.
  10. Yalciner, A. C., Pelinovsky, E., Zaytsev, A., Kurkin, A., Özer, C., Karakuş, H., NAMIDANCE Manual. METU Ocean Eng. Research Center, Ankara, Turkey, 2006.
  11. Liu, P. L. F., Cho, Y. S., Yoon, S. B., Seo, S. N., Numerical Simulations of the 1960 Chilean Tsunami Propagation and Inundation at Hilo, Hawaii. Recent Dev. in Tsunami Res., ed.: M. I. El-Sabh, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1994.
  12. Titov, V., Kânoğlu, U., Synolakis, C., Development of MOST for Real-Time Tsunami Forecasting. ASCE J. Water., Port, Coast., and Ocean Eng. 142(6):03116004, 2016.
  13. Imamura, F., Yalçıner, A. C., Özyurt, G., TUNAMI Manual. Tohoku Uni., Japan, 2006.
  14. Koshimura, S., Hayashi, S., Gokon, H., The Impact of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Disaster and Impl. to the Reconst. Soils and Foundations. 54-4, 560-572, 2014.
  15. Suppasri, A., Charvet, I., Macabuag, J., R