SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Morfolojik özelliklerinin chernoff yüzleri ile grafiksel değerlendirilmesi

The graphic evaluation of morphological characters in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) by chernoff faces

H. Vasfi GENÇER
Ensar BAŞPINAR
Çetin FIRATLI
Pages
245–249
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This multivariate graphic technique, "Chernoff faces", could distinguish differences between ecotypes and between parents and offsprings enabling simple and quick visual comparisons.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Seven parent colonies and 5 offspring colonies of two different Anatolian honey bee (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) ecotypes (total 24 colonies) were sampled randomly for morphological analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Morphometric measurements were made on 10 characters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This multivariate graphic technique, "Chernoff faces", could distinguish differences between ecotypes and between parents and offsprings enabling simple and quick visual comparisons.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Seven parent colonies and 5 offspring colonies of two different Anatolian honey bee (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) ecotypes (total 24 colonies) were sampled randomly for morphological analysis. Morphometric measurements were made on 10 characters. A multivariate graphic method (Chernoff faces) was applied to data of parents and offsprings in representing morphometric data. This multivariate graphic technique, "Chernoff faces", could distinguish differences between ecotypes and between parents and offsprings enabling simple and quick visual comparisons.

Özet

iki farklı Anadolu arısı (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) ekotipinden 7'şer ebeveyn koloni ve bunların dölleri olan 5'er koloni (toplam 24 koloni) morfolojik analiz için rasgele örneklenmişlerdir. Morfometrik ölçümler 10 morfolojik özellik üzerinde yapılmıştır. Ebeveynlerin ve döllerin morfolojik özelliklerine ilişkin velilerine çok değişkenli grafik yöntemi (Chernoff yüzleri) uygulanmıştır. Bu çok değişkenli grafik tekniği "Chernöff yüzleri" basit ve çabuk görsel karşılaştırmalar sağlayarak ekotipler arasındaki ve ebeveynler ile döller arasındaki farklılıkları ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇER, H. V., BAŞPINAR, E., FIRATLI, Ç. (2022). Bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Morfolojik özelliklerinin chernoff yüzleri ile grafiksel değerlendirilmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 245–249. https://ajindex.com/articles/595336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alpatov, W. W. 1929. Biometrical studies on variation and races of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L). The Quarterly Review of Biology, 4:1-58.
  2. Chernoff, H. 1973. Using faces to represent points in K-dimensional space graphically. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68 (342): 361-368.
  3. Collins, A. M. 1986. Quantitative genetics "Ed. T.E. Rinderer. Bee Genetics and Breeding", pp. 283-304,
  4. Academic Press,
  5. Inc., London, UK. Crewe, R. M., H. R. Hepburn, and R. F. A. Moritz, 1994. Morphometric analysis of 2 southern African races of honeybee. Apidologie, 25 (1): 61-67.
  6. Daly, H. V. and S. S. Balling, 1978. Identification of Africanized honeybees in the western hemisphere by discriminant analysis. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 51 (4): 857-869.
  7. Daly, H. V., K. Hoelmer, P. Norman and T. Allen, 1982. Computer assisted measurement and identification of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 75 (6): 591-594.
  8. Du Praw, E. J. 1965. Non-Linnean taxonomy and the systematics of honeybees. Systematic Zoology, 14(1): 1-24.
  9. Hepburn, H. R. and S. E. Radloff, 1997. Biogeographical correlates of population variance in the honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) of Africa. Apidologie, 28 (5): 243-258.
  10. Johnson, R. A. and D. W. Wichern, 1982. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, USA; 594 pp. Kauhausen-Keller, D. and R. Keller, 1994. Morphometrical control of pure race breeding in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie, 25 (2): 133-143. Maul V. and A. Hâhnle, 1994. Morphometric studies with pure bred stock of Apis mellifera carnica Pollman from Hessen. Apidologie 25 (2): 119-132.
  11. Nazzi, F. 1992. Morphometric analysis of honey bees from an area of racial hybridization in northeastern Italy. Apidologie, 23: 89-96.
  12. Oldroyd, B., T. Rinderer and S. Buco, 1991. Heritability of morphological characters used to distinguish European and Africanized honeybees. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 82: 499-504.
  13. Moritz, R. F.A. 1989. The Instrumental Insemination of the Queen Bee. International Beekeeping Technology and Economy Institute of Apimondia, Bucharest, Romania; 176 pp. Moritz, R. F. A. 1991. The limitations of biometric control on pure race breeding in Apis mellifera. Journal of Apicultural Research, 30 (2): 54-59.
  14. Radloff, S. E., H. R. Hepburn, C. Hepburn and P. De La Rua, 2001. Morphometry affinities and population structure of honey bees of the Balearic Islands (Spain). Journal of Apicultur