Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6

Genetic relationships among the genera Cicer L., Lathyrus L., Lens Mill., and Vicia L., together with similarity of Lens taxa based on morphological and AFLP markers

Pages
566–575
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated the following genetic relationship: Lens culinaris subsp. culinaris, Lens culinaris subsp. orientalis, Lens culinaris subsp. tomentosus, Lens culinaris subsp. odemensis, L. ervoides, L. lamottei, and L. nigricans.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The molecular characterization of the seven taxa in the genus Lens Mill. with Vicia montbretii has not been performed, and species of the genera Vicia L., Lathyrus L., and Cicer L. using AFLP markers have not been elucidated so far.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of the 414 AFLP markers, 280 entailing the most informative and polymorphic were used for the molecular analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated the following genetic relationship: Lens culinaris subsp. culinaris, Lens culinaris subsp. orientalis, Lens culinaris subsp. tomentosus, Lens culinaris subsp. odemensis, L. ervoides, L. lamottei, and L. nigricans.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The molecular characterization of the seven taxa in the genus Lens Mill. with Vicia montbretii has not been performed, and species of the genera Vicia L., Lathyrus L., and Cicer L. using AFLP markers have not been elucidated so far. The objectives of the present study were the assessment of (i) genetic relationships among the genera Lens, Vicia, Lathyrus, and Cicer based on AFLP markers, (ii) relationships within the genus Lens including the accessions of L. lamottei Czefr., L. tomentosus Ladiz., and L. odemensis Ladiz., based on morphological and AFLP data, and (iii) position of the species Vicia montbretii (Fisch. and Mey.) Davis and Plitmann based on molecular markers. The genetic material consisted of seven Lens taxa comprising each three accessions of cultivated lentils (L. culinarisMedik.), L. orientalis (Boiss.) Ponert, L. tomentosus, L. odemensis, L. ervoides (Brign.) Grande, and L. nigricans (M.Bieb.) Godr., plus two L. lamottei accessions. Two Vicia montbretii accessions were also included to assess their relationship with the genus Lens Mill. As morphological markers the number of toothed stipules, stipule angle, aristae on peduncle, and pod pubescence were evaluated regarding lentil species. Of the 414 AFLP markers, 280 entailing the most informative and polymorphic were used for the molecular analysis. The genus Lens was genetically closer to the genera Vicia and Lathyrus than to the genus Cicer. V. montbretti was well separated from the genus Lens. The results indicated the following genetic relationship: Lens culinaris subsp. culinaris, Lens culinaris subsp. orientalis, Lens culinaris subsp. tomentosus, Lens culinaris subsp. odemensis, L. ervoides, L. lamottei, and L. nigricans.

🔖

Cite This Article

İKTEN, C., YILDIZDOĞAN, Z., MUTLU, N., TOKER, C. (2022). Genetic relationships among the genera Cicer L., Lathyrus L., Lens Mill., and Vicia L., together with similarity of Lens taxa based on morphological and AFLP markers. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6, 566–575. https://ajindex.com/articles/594260

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abbo S, Ladizinsky G (1991). Anatomical aspects of hybrid embryo abortion in the genus Lens L. Bot Gazette 152: 316-320.
  2. Abbo S, Ladizinsky G (1994). Genetical aspects of hybrid embryo abortion in the genus Lens L. Heredity 72: 193-200.
  3. Ahmad M, McNeil DL, Fautrier AG (1996). Genetic relationships in Lens species and parentage determination of their interspecific hybrids using RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 92: 1091-1098.
  4. Ahmad M, McNeil DL, Sedcole R (1997). Phylogenetic relationships in Lens species and their interspecific hybrids as measured by morphological characters, Euphytica 94: 101-111.
  5. Alo F, Furman BJ, Akhunov E, Dvorak J, Gepts P (2011). Leveraging genomics resources of model species for the assessment of diversity and phylogeny in wild and domesticated lentil. J Heredity 102: 315-329.
  6. Balyan HS, Houben A, Ahne R (2002). Karyotype analysis and physical mapping of 18S-5.8S-25S and 5S ribosomal RNA loci in species of genus Lens Miller (Fabaceae). Caryologia 55: 121-128.
  7. Cubero JI (1981). Origin, taxonomy and domestication. In: Webb C, Hawtin G. editors. Lentils. Wallingford, UK: CAB Int., pp 15-38.
  8. Cubero JI, Perez de le Vega M, Fratini R (2009). Origin, phylogeny, domestication and spread. In: Erskine W, Muehlbauer FJ, Sarker A, Sharma B, editors. The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford, UK: CAB Int., pp 13-33.
  9. Czefranova ZV (1971). Review of species in the genus Lens Mill. Novosti Sistematiki Vysshikh Rastenii 8: 184-191 (in Russian). Datta S, Tiwari S, Kaashyap M, Gupta P, Choudhury PR, Kumari J, Kumar S (2011). Genetic similarity analysis in lentil using cross-genera legume sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Crop Sci 51: 2412-2422.
  10. Davies PA, Lulsdorf MM, Ahmad M (2007). Wild relatives and biotechnological approaches. In: Yadav SS, McNeil D, Stevenson PC, editors. The Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 25-240.
  11. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
  12. Duran Y, Fratini R, Garcia P, Perez de la Vega M (2004). An intersubspecific genetic map of Lens. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1265-1237.
  13. Eujayl I, Baum M, Powell W, Erskine W, Pehu E (1998). A genetic linkage map of lentil (Lens sp.) based on RAPD and AFLP markers using recombinant inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 97: 83-89.
  14. Ferguson ME, Maxted N, Slageren MV, Robertson LD (2000). A reassessment of the taxonomy of Lens Mill. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Vicieae). Bot J Linn Soc 133: 41-59