Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6

Labellum micromorphology of some orchid genera (Orchidaceae) distributed in the Black Sea region in Turkey

Pages
623–636
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

UPGMA of cluster analysis was used to evaluate the morphological and micromorphological features of the labellum and spur among the analyzed taxa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A detailed micromorphological analysis of the labellum was carried out using both light and scanning electron microscopy on 14 genera (Anacamptis, Cephalanthera, Coeloglossum, Dactylorhiza, Gymnadenia, Himantoglossum, Limodorum, Neottia, Orchis,Ophrys, Platanthera, Serapias, Spiranthes, and Steveniella) of Orchidaceae in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In many genera, characteristically shaped secretory trichomes and papillae were concentrated at the base part close to the gynostemium or the distal part of the labellum and on all surfaces of the spur.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:UPGMA of cluster analysis was used to evaluate the morphological and micromorphological features of the labellum and spur among the analyzed taxa.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A detailed micromorphological analysis of the labellum was carried out using both light and scanning electron microscopy on 14 genera (Anacamptis, Cephalanthera, Coeloglossum, Dactylorhiza, Gymnadenia, Himantoglossum, Limodorum, Neottia, Orchis,Ophrys, Platanthera, Serapias, Spiranthes, and Steveniella) of Orchidaceae in Turkey. In the samples, various epidermal features were identified in the spur that developmentally are invaginations of the labellum and the adaxial surface of the labellum. Typical secretory cells and inclusions such as starch or calcium oxalate crystals of different sizes and shapes were found within the structure of individuals. In many genera, characteristically shaped secretory trichomes and papillae were concentrated at the base part close to the gynostemium or the distal part of the labellum and on all surfaces of the spur. In the genus Ophrys, the labellum surface was covered with many hairs. Furthermore, the labellum surface striation varied among the orchid genera. UPGMA of cluster analysis was used to evaluate the morphological and micromorphological features of the labellum and spur among the analyzed taxa.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜNGÜ, Ş. Ş., AKBULUT, M. K., ŞENEL, G. (2022). Labellum micromorphology of some orchid genera (Orchidaceae) distributed in the Black Sea region in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6, 623–636. https://ajindex.com/articles/594247

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anton S, Kaminska M, Stpiczyńska M (2012). Comparative structure of the osmophores in the flower of Stanhopea graveolens Lindley and Cycnoches chlorochilon Klotzsch (Orchidaceae). Acta Agrobot 65: 11-22.
  2. Ayasse M, Schiestl FP, Paulus HF, Löfstedt C, Hansson B, Ibarra F, Francke W (2000). Evolution of reproductive strategies in the sexually deceptive orchid Ophrys sphegodes: How does flower-specific variation of odour signals influence reproductive success? Evolution 54: 1995-2006.
  3. Ay b eke M (2012). Anther wall and pollen development in Ophrys mammosa L. (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst Evol 298: 1015-1023.
  4. Bateman RM, Rudall PJ (2006). The good, the bad and the ugly: using naturally occurring terata to distinguish the possible from the impossible in orchid floral evolution. Aliso 22: 481-496.
  5. Bell AK, Roberts DL, Hawkins JA, Rudall PJ, Box MS, Bateman RM (2009). Comparative micromorphology of nectariferous and nectarless labellar spurs in selected clades of subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 160: 369-387.
  6. Box MS, Bateman RM, Glover BJ, Rudall PJ (2008). Floral ontogenetic evidence of repeated speciation via paedomorphosis in subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc157: 429-454.
  7. Burns-Balogh P, Szlachetko DL, Dafni A (1987). Evolution, pollination, and systematics of the tribe Neottieae (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst Evol 156: 91-115.
  8. Chase MW, Williams NH, Donisete De Faria A, Neubig KM, Do Carmo M, Amaral E, Whitten WM (2009). Floral convergence in Oncidiinae (Cymbiieae; Orchidaceae): an expanded concept of Gomesa and a new genus Ohawilliamsia. Ann Bot-London 104: 387-402.
  9. Cozzolino S, Widmer A (2005). Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends Ecol Evol 20: 487-494.
  10. Curry KJ, McDowell LM, Judd WS, Stern WL (1991). Osmophores, floral features, and systematics of Stanhopea (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 78: 610-623.
  11. Dafni A (1987). Pollination in Orchis and related genera: Evolution from reward to deception. In: Arditti, J. editor. Orchid biology: Reviews and perspectives, Vol. 4. Ithaca, London: Comstock Publishing Associates, pp. 79-104.
  12. Dafni A, Ivri Y (1981). The flower biology of Cephalanthera longifolia (Orchidaceae). Pollen imitation and facultative floral mimicry. Plant Syst Evol 137: 229-240. Darwin C (1862). On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects. 1st ed. London, UK: J. Murray. Darwin C (1888). Fertilisation of Orchids: The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are