SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Explaining Employee Voice Behavior Through Intragroup Relationship Quality and the Role of Thriving at Work

Çalışan Ses Davranışının Grupiçi İlişki Kalitesi ile Açıklanabilirliği ve İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Rolü

Ömer Erdem KOÇAK
Hazel AGUN
Pages
179–202
Publication Date
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the data fit the model well, and the significant indirect effect exists, which confirms the full mediator role of thriving at work.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we propose an underlying mechanism that provides a link between high-quality relationships as a group-level concept and employee voice as individual behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To test this mediation link, we conducted an online survey with 462 participants and used structural equation modeling with the bootstrapping method to reveal whether thriving at work mediates the relationship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the data fit the model well, and the significant indirect effect exists, which confirms the full mediator role of thriving at work.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İşte Kendini Yetiştirme · Çalışan Ses Davranışı · Yüksek İlişki Kalitesi

Abstract

In this study, we propose an underlying mechanism that provides a link between high-quality relationships as a group-level concept and employee voice as individual behavior. After an extent literature scanning, we employed the concept of thriving since it comprehends both hedonic and eudemonic well-being as well as his roots in social dynamics. To test this mediation link, we conducted an online survey with 462 participants and used structural equation modeling with the bootstrapping method to reveal whether thriving at work mediates the relationship. The results show that the data fit the model well, and the significant indirect effect exists, which confirms the full mediator role of thriving at work. This study has value as it shows what extent social environment impacts individual states and behaviors.

Özet

Bu çalışmada grup düzeyindeki bir kavram olan grup içi ilişki kalitesi ile birey düzeyindeki kavram olan çalışan ses davranışının arasında ilişki kurulmasını sağlayan bir mekanizma önerilmiştir. Literatür taramasıyla karşılaştırılan kavramlar arasında işte kendini yetiştirmenin hem hazcı ve mutçu esenlik boyutlarını kapsaması hem de köklerinin sosyal dinamiklerde olması nedeniyle kullanılması düşünülmüştür. Bu aracılık etkisini test etmek için online anket yoluyla 462 katılımcıdan veri toplanmıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ve bootstrapping metodu kullanılarak işte kendini yetiştirmenin ilişkide aracı olup olmadığı test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, verilerin modelle uyumlu olduğunu, anlamlı dolaylı etkinin bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Buna göre işte kendini yetiştirmenin tam aracı etkisi olduğu doğrulanmıştır. Bu çalışma, sosyal çevrenin birey hal ve davranışları üzerindeki etkiyi göstermesi açısından önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇAK, Ö. E., AGUN, H. (2019). Explaining Employee Voice Behavior Through Intragroup Relationship Quality and the Role of Thriving at Work. Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 179–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/5935

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. (2016). Promoting thriving at work and waning turnover intention: A relational perspective. Future Business Journal, 2(2), 127-137.Afzali, A., Arash Motahari, A., & Hatami-Shirkouhi, L. (2014). Investigating the influence of perceived organizational support, psychological empowerment and organizational learning on job performance: an empirical investigation. Tehnički vjesnik, 21(3), 623-629.Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Organizational commitment: evidence of career stage effects?. Journal of business research, 26(1), 49-61.Arbuckle, J. (2008). Amos 17.0 user's guide. SPSS Inc. Argyle, M., & Crossland, J. (1987). The dimensions of positive emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26(2), 127-137.
  2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career development international, 13(3), 209-223.
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: the desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497. Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In Gilbert, Daniel T. (Ed); Fiske, Susan T. (Ed); Lindzey, Gardner (Ed), (1998). The 97 handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed.). pp. 193-281.
  4. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill, x, 1085 pp. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of management journal, 31(3), 676-685.
  5. Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. New York: J Wiley & Sons, 352. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
  6. Bowling, N. A. (2010). Effects of job satisfaction and conscientiousness on extra-role behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 119-130.
  7. Brueller, D., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Linking capacities of high‐quality relationships to team learning and performance in service organizations. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 455-477.
  8. Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford University Press.
  9. Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191.
  10. Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high‐quality interpersonal relationships and psyc