SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Hekimliği Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of hand-eye dominance and visual reaction time n swimmers

Bihter AKINOĞLU
Tuğba KOCAHAN
Aydın BALCI
Seda BAYSAL
Adnan HASANOĞLU
Banu KABAK
Pages
81–85
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Right hand reaction time with the left eye open was the shortest, and left hand reaction time with the right eye open was the longest (X2(2) =20,455, p=

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectve: The aim of this study is to compare visual reaction times of swimmers with similar or different side dominance of the hand and eye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Different visual reaction times within the gro‐ up were evaluated using the Friedman chi-square test, and origin of any significant difference was determined with the Wilcoxon signed sum of ranks test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Right hand reaction time with the left eye open was the shortest, and left hand reaction time with the right eye open was the longest (X2(2) =20,455, p=
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectve: The aim of this study is to compare visual reaction times of swimmers with similar or different side dominance of the hand and eye. Materal and Methods: Thirty regularly training swimmers were included in the study. Hand dominance was based on answers given to specific questi‐ ons; eye dominance was determined by the eye lateralization test. Athletes with right hand dominance were divided into two groups with right side eye dominance (straight dominant), and left side eye dominance (counter dominant). Visual reaction times of swimmers were evaluated with the WittySem © visual reaction test device. Data were compared between groups using the Mann Whitney-U test. Different visual reaction times within the gro‐ up were evaluated using the Friedman chi-square test, and origin of any significant difference was determined with the Wilcoxon signed sum of ranks test. Statistical error level was set at p0.05). Straight-domi‐ nant athletes had different reaction times for both hands with the right or left eye open, and the right hand with both eyes open. Right hand reaction time with the left eye open was the shortest, and left hand reaction time with the right eye open was the longest (X2(2) =20,455, p=

🔖

Cite This Article

AKINOĞLU, B., KOCAHAN, T., BALCI, A., BAYSAL, S., HASANOĞLU, A., KABAK, B. (2022). Comparison of hand-eye dominance and visual reaction time n swimmers. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 81–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/593227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mtchell CJ, de Houwer J, Lovbond PF. The propostonal nature of human assocatve learnng. Behav Bran Sc. 2009;32(2):183-246.
  2. Dane S, Yldrm S, Ozan E, Aydn N, Oral E, Ustaoglu N,etal. Handedness,eyedness,and handeye crossed domnance n patents wth schzophrena: sex-related lateralsaton abnormaltes. Lateralty. 2009;14(1):55-65.
  3. Porac C, Coren S. The domnanteye. Psychol Bull. 1976;83(5):880-97. Ress MR. Ocular domnance: somefamly data. Lateralty. 1997;2(1):7-16.
  4. Scharoun SM, Bryden PJ. Hand preference, performance abltes, and hand selecton n chldren. Front Psychol. 2014;5:82. Gümüş M. Analyss of the relatonshp between cerebral lateralzaton and grp strength n elte fencngathletes. Lfe Sc J. 2017;14(8):97-104.
  5. Gautam Y, Bade M. Eect of audtory nterference on vsual smple reacton tme. Kathmandu Unv Med J. 2017;15(60):329-31.
  6. Ender E, Münroğlu RS, Uğur Ö.Farklı yaş gruplarındak lsanslı tensçlern görselveştsel reaksyon zamanlarının ncelenmes. UKSAD. 2017;3(2):343-52.
  7. Mlc M, Nedeljkovc A, Cuk I, Mudrc M, García-Ramos A. Comparson of reacton tme between begnners and experenced fencers durng quas-realstc fencng stuatons. Eur J Sport Sc. 2020;20(7):896-905.
  8. Kaluga E, Straburzynska-Lupa A, Rostkowska E. Hand-eye coordnaton, movement reacton tmeand hand tactlesenstvty dependng on the practced sports dscplne. J Sports Med Phys Ftness. 2020;60(1):17-25.
  9. Bokl C, Bsen R, Kalra K. Eectveness of upper extremty proproceptve tranng on reacton tmen tabletenns players. Int J Health Sc Res. 2020;10(5):34-9.
  10. Demrhan B, Abdurahmanova C, Ger S, Canuzakov K. Examnaton of reacton tmes ofathletes of Kyrgyz Natonal Team durng preparaton perod for 2016 Summer Olympc Games. Int J Sport Cult Sc. 2019;7(1):25-30.
  11. Caccese JB, Eckner JT, Franco-MacKendrck L, Hazzard JB, N M, Broglo SP, et al. Clncal react- on-tme performancefactors n healthycollegateathletes. J Athl Tran. 2020;55(6): 601-7.
  12. Nur L, Shadmehr A, Ghotb N, Attarbash Moghadam B. Reacton tme and antcpatory skll of athletes n open and closed skll-domnated sport. Eur J Sport Sc. 2013;13(5):431-6. Turna B. The eect of aglty tranng on reacton tme n fencers. J Educ Learn. 2020;9(1):127-35. Cureda KJ. Smple eye-hand reacton tme n the retnal perphery can be reduced wth tra- nng. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37(3):145-6.
  13. Çömük N, Erden Z. Artstk buz patennde üçlü sıçrayış performansının çevklk ve reaksyon zamanı lelşks. Fzyoterap Rehabltasyon. 2010;21(2):75-80.
  14. Polszczuk T, Mańkowska M, Polszczuk D, Wśnewsk A. Symmetryand asymmetry of reacton tmeand bod