SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Hekimliği Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

A Comparison of Functional Movement Abilities of Elite Male Soccer andHandball Players

Elit Erkek Futbol ve Hentbol Oyuncularının Fonksiyonel Hareket Becerilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Necmiye ÜN YILDIRIM
Melda Pelin YARGIÇ
Galip Bilen KÜRKLÜ
Ahmet BAYRAK
Pages
169–174
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After analyzing the sub-parameters, handball players displayed more asymmetry in shoulder mobility test as well as in in-line lunge (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ntroduction: Both handball and soccer athletes are under high risk of injury, therefore evaluations that assist injury prevention are of high importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study compared FMS™ scores of 22 elite male soccer players to 24 elite male handball players.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After analyzing the sub-parameters, handball players displayed more asymmetry in shoulder mobility test as well as in in-line lunge (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ntroduction: Both handball and soccer athletes are under high risk of injury, therefore evaluations that assist injury prevention are of high importance. Functional Movement Screening (FMS™) is a test tool used for evaluating athletes’ movement capacity and injury risk. The purpose of this study is to measure and compare the functional movement capacities and asymmetries in professional soccer and handball players. Methods: This study compared FMS™ scores of 22 elite male soccer players to 24 elite male handball players. FMS™ consists of an evaluation of seven basic movements, scored from 0 to 3. Results: Mean total FMS™ scores were 15.65±1.69 and 16.75 ± 1.87 for handball and soccer players, respectively. After analyzing the sub-parameters, handball players displayed more asymmetry in shoulder mobility test as well as in in-line lunge (p

Özet

ÖZAmaç: Futbol ve hentbol spor yaralanmalarının sık görüldüğü branşlardır, bu nedenleyaralanmadan koruyucu olabilecek değerlendirmeler önem arz etmektedir. FonksiyonelHareket Taraması (FMS™) sporcuların hareket becerilerini ve yaralanma risklerini değerlendiren bir test bataryasıdır. Bu araştırmanın amacı profesyonel hentbol vefutbolcuların fonksiyonel hareket kapasiteleri ile asimetrilerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada 22 elit erkek futbolcu ile 24 elit erkekhentbolcunun FMS™ skorları karşılaştırılmıştır. FMS™ analizi yedi temel hareketindeğerlendirilip her harekete 0-3 arası bir skor verilmesi ile yapılmaktadır. Bulgular: Ortalama total FMS™ skorları, hentbol ve futbolcular için sırasıyla15.65±1.69 ve 16.75 ± 1.87 olarak bulundu. Alt parametreler araştırıldığında, omuzmobilite testi ve in-line lunge hareketlerinde hentbol oyuncuları daha asimetrik bulundu. (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, N. Ü., YARGIÇ, M. P., KÜRKLÜ, G. B., BAYRAK, A. (2022). A Comparison of Functional Movement Abilities of Elite Male Soccer andHandball Players. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 169–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/654253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hawkins RD, Fuller CW. A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. Br J Sports Med 1999 Jun;33(3):196–203
  2. Waldén M, Hägglund M, Ekstrand J. UEFA Champions League study: a prospective study of injuries in professional football during the 2001-2002 season. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Aug;39(8):542–6
  3. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Kristenson K, Magnusson H, Waldén M. Fewer ligament injuries but no preventive effect on muscle injuries and severe injuries: an 11- year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;47(12):732–7
  4. Higashi RH, Santos MB, Castro GTM de, Ejnisman B, Sano SS, Cunha RA Da. Lesões musculoesqueléticas em jovens atletas de handebol: um estudo transversal. Fisioter e Pesqui. 2015;22(1):84–9
  5. Giroto N, Hespanhol Junior LC, Gomes MRC, Lopes AD. Incidence and risk factors of injuries in Brazilian elite handball players: A prospective cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Feb;27(2):195–202
  6. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Waldén M. Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jun 1;45(7):553–8
  7. Chimera NJ, Warren M. Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport. World J Orthop. 2016 Apr 18;7(4):202–17
  8. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 May;9(3):396– 409
  9. Minick KI, Kiesel KB, Burton L, Taylor A, Plisky P, Butler RJ. Interrater Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):479–86
  10. Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Jun;5(2):47–54
  11. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can Serious Injury in Professional Football be Predicted by a Preseason Functional Movement Screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Aug;2(3):147–58
  12. Butler RJ, Contreras M, Burton LC, Plisky PJ, Goode A, Kiesel K. Modifiable risk factors predict injuries in firefighters during training academies. Work. 2013 Jan 1;46(1):11–7
  13. Ko M-J, Noh K-H, Kang M-H, Oh J-S. Differences in performance on the functional movement screen between chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jul;28(7):2094– 6
  14. Choi H-S, Shin W-