SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

The effects of student teaching on preservice teachers’ teacher efficacy

Öğretmenlik uygulaması dersinin öğretmen yeterliği üzerine etkisi

Işıl AKTAĞ
Pages
13–24
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of study, efficacy mean of pre-service teachers was found X =7.17 ± .64.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to identfy and decribe the teacher efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers during student teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:How teacher efficacy of pre-service teachers differ during student teaching according to their gender was also investigated. 238 pre-service teachers, included in the Faculty of Education and the Department of Physical Education at AIBU participated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of study, efficacy mean of pre-service teachers was found X =7.17 ± .64.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identfy and decribe the teacher efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers during student teaching. How teacher efficacy of pre-service teachers differ during student teaching according to their gender was also investigated. 238 pre-service teachers, included in the Faculty of Education and the Department of Physical Education at AIBU participated in this study. Data were collected at the beginning and at the end of student teaching. Teacher Sense of Efficacy developed by Tschannen- Moran and Woolfolk-Hoy in 2001 and translated Turkish by Işıl Aktağ in 2003 used to collect data. Also open ended questions were asked to all preservice teachers at the beginning and at the end of the study. Data were analyzed by using t test for dependent variables. According to the results of study, efficacy mean of pre-service teachers was found X =7.17 ± .64. No significant difference in efficacy beliefs in male and female pre-service teachers was found. And no significant difference in efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers between pre-test and posttest scores were observed. Student teachers’ answers to open ended questions were gathered and themes were created. These themes were similar to scale’s factors. Those themes were class management, student engagement and teaching styles. Besides these themes a new theme was emerged from study “communication”.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi ve Beden Eğitimi Öğretmenliği Bölümünde okuyan ve öğretmenlik uygulaması dersini alan öğretmen adayların bu ders süresince öğretmen yeterliklerindeki değişimleri incelemektir. Araştırmaya Eğitim Fakültesinin çeşitli bölümlerinde ve Beden Eğitimi Öğretmenliği bölümünde okuyan ve öğretmenlik uygulaması dersini alan 238 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmada Tschannen-Moran ve Woolfolk-Hoy (2001) tarafından hazırlanan ve Türkçeye Işıl Aktağ (2003) tarafından çevrilen Öğretmen Yeterliği Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca bütün öğretmen adaylarına hem ön-test hem de son-testte açık uçlu sorular sorulmuştur. Veriler t test bağımlı değişkenler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen yeterliği ortalaması X =7.17 ± .64 olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırmaya katılan öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen yeterliği cinsiyete göre değişiklik göstermemektedir. Ayrıca öğretmenlik uygulaması dersinin öğretmen adayları üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi bulunamamıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının açık uçlu sorulara verdikleri yanıtlar derlenerek temalar elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen bu temaların bazıları anketin alt boyutlarıyla birebir örtüştüğü gibi sınıf yönetimi, öğrenci katılımı ve öğretim yöntemleri, araştırmada öğretmen adayları tarafından sıklıkla vurgulanan tema olarak iletişim ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAĞ, I. (2022). The effects of student teaching on preservice teachers’ teacher efficacy. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 13–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/593151

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aktağ I, Walter J. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının mesleki yeterlik duygusu. Spormetre, 3(4), 127-131
  2. Ashton PT, Webb R B. (1986). Making a Difference: Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement. New York: Longman
  3. Ashton PT. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32
  4. Bandura A. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215
  5. Bandura A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall
  6. Bandura A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York:W.H.Freeman 7. Barney D, Pleban F. (2006). Pre-service physical education teachers’ perception of teaching before and after a semester long elementary education practicum experience. Physical Educator, 63(1)
  7. Baysal N, Arkan K, Yıldırım A. (2010). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of their efficacy in teaching thinking skills. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 420-4254
  8. Campbell J. (1996). A comparison of teacher efficacy of pre-service teachers in Scotland and America, Education, 117, 2–12
  9. Celep C. (2000). The correlation of the factors: the prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy, beliefs, and attitudes about student control. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 17E,(4), 99-112, ERIC Document ED 45115
  10. Chacon CT. (2005). Teachers’ perceived efficacy among English as foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 257-272
  11. Coladarci T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337
  12. Creswell J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. USA: Sage Pub
  13. Elliott ES. (2000). The Relationship Between Teacher Efficacy and Principal Leadership Behaviors and Teacher Background Variables in Elementary Schools. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Conneticut, USA
  14. Evans ED, Tribble M. (1986). Gender development and gender effects. (In D.C. Berliner and R.C. Colfee, der.) Handbook of Educational Psychology. pp 358-396. New York: Macmillan, USA
  15. Hoy WK, Woolfolk AE. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School of Journalist, 93(4), 355-372
  16. Köseoğlu P, Yılmaz M, Gerçek C, Saran H. (2007). Bilgisayar kursunun bilgisayara yöneli