Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the Efficiency and Side Effects of Syringe Size in Spinal Anesthesia

Spinal Anestezide Farklı Boyutta Enjektörlerin Etkinlik ve Yan Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılmas

Pages
301–307
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The time required was 2.5±0.8 minutes for GroupI, while it was 3.2±0.9 minutes for Group II, and 3.2±1.0 minutes for Group III (Group I vsGroup II: p=0.001, Group I vs Group III: p=0.002, Group II vs Group III: p=0.843).Conclusion: The results indicated that the difference in the diameter of the injector hadonly a minimal effect on hemodynamic parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Obstetric anesthesia and analgesia are administered to reduce pain during labor.The effect of 3 different-sized injectors (2.5 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL) used to achieve a subarachnoid block, each containing the same volume of local anesthesia, were analyzed, as well ascomplications and patient hemodynamics.Methods: A total of 120 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I orII in the age group of 18 to 45 years who underwent a cesarean section with subarachnoidanesthesia were enrolled in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Group I, 2.5-mL injectors were used; in Group II,5-mL injectors were used; and 10-mL injectors were used in Group III.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The time required was 2.5±0.8 minutes for GroupI, while it was 3.2±0.9 minutes for Group II, and 3.2±1.0 minutes for Group III (Group I vsGroup II: p=0.001, Group I vs Group III: p=0.002, Group II vs Group III: p=0.843).Conclusion: The results indicated that the difference in the diameter of the injector hadonly a minimal effect on hemodynamic parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Obstetric anesthesia and analgesia are administered to reduce pain during labor.The effect of 3 different-sized injectors (2.5 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL) used to achieve a subarachnoid block, each containing the same volume of local anesthesia, were analyzed, as well ascomplications and patient hemodynamics.Methods: A total of 120 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I orII in the age group of 18 to 45 years who underwent a cesarean section with subarachnoidanesthesia were enrolled in the study. In Group I, 2.5-mL injectors were used; in Group II,5-mL injectors were used; and 10-mL injectors were used in Group III. The hemodynamicparameters of all of the patients were recorded. Postoperative Bromage scale and pinpricktests were performed to assess motor and sensorial block levels, and time for recovery fromthe block was also recorded. Postoperative complications (headache, lumbar pain), and anyrequirement for an epidural blood patch was noted.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the time to reach T4 dermatomebetween Group I and Group II (p=0.002). The time required was 2.5±0.8 minutes for GroupI, while it was 3.2±0.9 minutes for Group II, and 3.2±1.0 minutes for Group III (Group I vsGroup II: p=0.001, Group I vs Group III: p=0.002, Group II vs Group III: p=0.843).Conclusion: The results indicated that the difference in the diameter of the injector hadonly a minimal effect on hemodynamic parameters. Further studies with other patient groupsand different surgical procedures will produce more comprehensive results

Özet

Amaç: Doğum öncesi anestezi ve analjezi, doğum sırasındaki ağrıyı azaltmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada aynı lokal anestezi hacmini içeren üç farklı ebatlı enjektörün (2.5 mL, 5 mL, 10 mL) subaraknoid blok seviyesine, komplikasyonlara ve hasta hemodinamisine olan etkisini araştırdık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza subaraknoid anestezi ile sezeryan olan 18–45 yaş grubundaki 120 ASA I-II hastası alındı. Grup I’de 2.5 mL enjektör, Grup II 5 mL enjektör ve Grup III 10 mL enjektör kullanıldı. Hemodinamik parametreler kaydedildi. Motor ve duyusal blok seviyeleri için ameliyat sonrası Bromage skalaları ve Pinprick testleri yapılmış ve blokların geri kazanılma zamanı da kaydedilmiştir. Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar (baş ağrısı, lomber ağrı) ve epidural kan yaması gerektiren olgular kaydedildi. Bulgular: Grup I ile Grup II arasında T4 dermatoma ulaşma süresi ile ilgili istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p=0.002). Grup I için 2.5±0.8 dakika, Grup II için 3.2±0.9 dakika ve Grup III için 3.2±1.0 dakika (Grup I–Grup II p=0.001, Grup I–Grup III p=0.002, Grup II–Grup III p=0.843). Sonuç: Enjektörün çapındaki değişikliğin minimal hemodinamik parametreler üreteceğini düşünüyoruz. Farklı cerrahi prosedürlere sahip diğer hasta gruplarıyla yapılan daha kapsamlı çalışmalar daha kapsamlı sonuçlara neden olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GEYİK, F. D., ERKAL, K. H., YÜCE, Y., ÇEVİK, B. E., ÇITAK, N. (2022). Comparison of the Efficiency and Side Effects of Syringe Size in Spinal Anesthesia. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 301–307. https://ajindex.com/articles/592919

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kayhan Z. Klinik anestezi. 3rd ed. Ankara: Logos Yayıncılık; 2004. p. 503–18, 559–70, 736–7, 740–54
  2. Erdem MK, Özgen S, Coşkun F. Obstetrik Anestezi ve Analjezi. Kişnişci H, Gokşin E, editors. Temel Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Bilgisi. Ankara: Melisa Matbaacılık; 1996. p. 173–86
  3. Santos AC, Fihster M, Pederson H. Obstetric Anesthesia. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stelty RK, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. Philadelphia: JP Lippincott Co; 1998. p. 1267–306
  4. Clark SL. Cesarean Section. In: Hankils GDV, Clark SL, Cunnigham FG, Giltstrap LC, editors. Operative Obstetrics. Connecticut: Appleton and Lange; 1995. p. 301–22
  5. Erdine S. Rejyonal Anestezi. Istanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2005. p. 159–79, 253–70
  6. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP. Klinik Anesteziyoloji. 4th ed. In: M Tulunay, H Cuhruk, translation editors. Ankara: Öncü Matbaası; 2004. p. 263–75, 813–15, 874–78, 901–3
  7. Günaydın B. Obstetrik ve Jinekolojik Anestezi. In: Keçik Y, Alkış N, Yörükoğlu D, Alanoğlu Z, editors. Temel Anestezi. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri 2012. p. 549–69
  8. Ateş Y. Spinal, Epidural ve Kaudal Bloklar In: Tulunay M, Cuhruk H, editors, Klinik Anesteziyoloji. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri; 2008. p. 289–324
  9. Kocamanoğlu IS, Sarıhasan B, Şener B, Tür A, Şahinoğlu H, Sunter T. Methods and complications of anesthesia in cesarean/section operations: retrospective evaluations of 3552 cases [Article in Turkish]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2005;25:810–6
  10. Öztürk E, But A, Gülhaş N, Begeç Z, Doğan Z, Yapıcı E, Ersoy ÖM. Sezaryende bupivakain ve ropivakainin hemodinami üzerine etkileri. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2006;34:355–60
  11. Şahin Ş, Owen M. Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Obstetrik Analjezi ve Anestezi. TARCM 2002;30:52–9
  12. Harten JM, Boyne I, Hannah P, Varveris D, Brown A. Effects of a height and weight adjusted dose of local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. Anaesthesia 2005;60:348–53
  13. Darçın S, Borazan H, Otelcioğlu Ş. Comparison the Different Delivery Speeds of Levobupivacaine and Fentanyl in Spinal Anesthesia [Article in Turkish]. Selçuk Üniv Tıp Derg 2011;27:27–31.