Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 29

Patent Box Regime in Selected EU Countries and Turkey

Seçilmiş AB Ülkelerinde ve Türkiye'de Patent Gelirlerine İlişkin Vergileme "Patent Box" Rejimi

Pages
183–203
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patent income is exempt from tax in Ireland. 50% corporate and personal income tax exemption has been carrying for patent income in Turkey since 2014

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:"Patent Box" regime expresses reduced corporate tax rate to the income derived from patents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the guidelines of European Innovation Scoreboards when compared with selected EU countries for patent applications, create design and trademark, Turkey's innovation performance is below the EU average.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patent income is exempt from tax in Ireland. 50% corporate and personal income tax exemption has been carrying for patent income in Turkey since 2014
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

"Patent Box" regime expresses reduced corporate tax rate to the income derived from patents. This regime intends to protect IP rights, its owners and obtained revenues from patents at the national level. In the study, patent box applications in Turkey and in some selected EU countries are comparatively evaluating. According to the guidelines of European Innovation Scoreboards when compared with selected EU countries for patent applications, create design and trademark, Turkey's innovation performance is below the EU average. Reduced corporate tax rate for patent income is 15% in France and 10% in UK. 20% of patent income in Belgium and Luxembourg and 50% of patent income in Spain is the subject to tax. Patent income is exempt from tax in Ireland. 50% corporate and personal income tax exemption has been carrying for patent income in Turkey since 2014

Özet

"Patent Box" rejimi, patent gelirlerine sağlanan indirimli kurumlar vergisi oranını ifade eder. Bu rejimle ulusal bazda fikrî mülkiyet haklarının, bu hakların sahiplerinin ve bu haklarla elde edilecek gelirlerin korunması amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışmada Patent Box uygulamasının seçilmiş AB ülkelerindeki ve Türkiye'deki durumu karşılaştırmalı olarak ele alınmaktadır. AB Yenilikçilik Kriterlerine göre Türkiye'nin yenilikçilik performansı, patent başvuruları ile marka ve tasarım oluşturmada AB ortalamasının altındadır. Patent gelirleri Fransa'da %15, İngiltere'de %10 indirimli kurumlar vergisine tabi iken; Belçika ve Lüksemburg'da patent gelirlerinin %20'si, İspanya'da %50'si vergiye tabidir. İrlanda'da patent gelirlerinin tamamı vergiden istisnadır. Türkiye'de ise 2014 yılında patent gelirlerine %50 kurumlar vergisi ve gelir vergisi istisnası getirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ORKUNOĞLU, I. F. Ş., YERELİ, A. B. (2022). Patent Box Regime in Selected EU Countries and Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 29, 183–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/592473

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alstadsaeter, A. & S. Barrios & G. Nicodeme & A.M. Skonieczna & A. Vezzani (2015), "Patent Boxes Design, Patents Location and Local R&D", European Commission Taxation Papers, Working Paper No. 57, January, 1-48.
  2. Atkinson, R. & S. Andes (2011), Innovation in Tax Policy and Tax Policy for Innovation, October, _____http://www.itif.org/files/2011-patent-box-final.pdf>, 10.10.2015, 1-22.
  3. Aykın, H. (2014), "Ticarileşmiş Sınai Mülkiyet Haklarından Elde Edilen Kazançlar İçin Yeni Vergisel Teşvik: Patent Box Rejimi", Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, Eylül, 312, 75-86.
  4. Bevington, M. & N. Dolman & M. Blunt, (2015),"Green Light for New Approach to Patent Boxes", Tax/ Intellectual Property, March, 6ba68e636351/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/73e539f9-c2ff-44bc-962a- 6e70e1c7e014/al_london_patentboxes_mar15.pdf>, 11.10.2015, 1-3.
  5. Böhm, T. & T. Karkinsky & N. Riedel (2012), "The Impact of Corporate Taxes on R&D and Patent Holdings", NBER Trans-Atlantic Public Economics Seminar of Business Taxation, June, _____http://conference.nber.org/confer//2012/TAPES12/Boehm_Karkinsky_Riedel.pdf>, 10.10.2015, 1-42.
  6. Bradley, S. & E. Dauchy & L. Robinson (2015), Cross-Country Evidence on the Preliminary Effects of Patent Box Regimes on Patent Activity and Ownership, October, Country_Evidence_on_the_Preliminary_Effects_of_Patent_Box_Regimes_on_Patent_A ctivity_and_Ownershi>, 17.09.2015, 1-32. Deloitte, (2012), R&D Tax Update Patent Box Regimes What's Inside?, 5 March, box-regimes.pdf>, 10.10.2015, 1-3.
  7. Deloitte (2015),
  8. AB Kurumlar Vergisi Oranları, August, corporate-tax-rates-2015.pdf>, 20.10.2015, 1-12.
  9. Dischinger, M. & N. Riedel (2008), "Corporate Taxes and the Location of Intangible Assets within Multinational Firms", Seminar for Economic Policy, Department of Economics, 28 July, University of Munich, _of_Intangible_Assets_Within_Multinational_Firms>, 15.10.2015, 1-34.
  10. Dischinger, M. & N. Riedel (2011), "Corporate Taxes and the Location of Intangible Assets within Multinational Firms", Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 691-707.
  11. Duhigg, C. & D. Kocieniewski (2012), "How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes", The New York Times, April 28, _____http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/business/apples-tax-strategy- aims-at-low-tax-states-and- nations.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=Peter%20Oppenheimer&st=Search>, 19.10.2015.
  12. Erb K., P. (2014), Ireland Declares 'Double Irish' Tax Scheme Dead, October 15, tax-scheme-dead/>, 15.10.2015. Ernst &Young (2015), "OECD Explains Agreed Aproach on Intangible Property Regime