SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Effect of Saliva Contamination and Subsequent DifferentProcedures On Bond Strength of a Cured UniversalAdhesive

Tükürük Kontaminasyonu ve Devamında Farklı İşlemlerinÜniversal Adezivlerin Dentine Bağlanma Dayanımına Etkisi

Ece MERAL
A. Rüya YAZICI
Cansu ATALAY
Aybüke USLU
A. Atila ERTAN
Pages
611–616
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regardless of the procedures, reapplication of adhesive did not affect the bond strength

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate theeffect of saliva contamination and subsequent differentprocedures on dentin bond strength of a cured universaladhesive.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following adhesive application (Adhese,Ivoclar/Vivadent) and LED curing, the teeth were randomlydivided into five groups according to saliva contaminationmethods (n=14): Group I-No contamination (control); Group II:Adhesive/Saliva/Dry; Group III: Adhesive/Saliva/ Dry/adhesive;GroupIV:Adhesive/Saliva/Rinse/Dry;GroupV:Adhesive/Saliva/Rin se/Dry/Adhesive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regardless of the procedures, reapplication of adhesive did not affect the bond strength
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate theeffect of saliva contamination and subsequent differentprocedures on dentin bond strength of a cured universaladhesive. Methods: Seventy extracted sound human molar teeth wereused for the study. After the teeth were longitudinally sectionedmesiodistally, they were grounded to obtain a standardized flatdentin surface. Following adhesive application (Adhese,Ivoclar/Vivadent) and LED curing, the teeth were randomlydivided into five groups according to saliva contaminationmethods (n=14): Group I-No contamination (control); Group II:Adhesive/Saliva/Dry; Group III: Adhesive/Saliva/ Dry/adhesive;GroupIV:Adhesive/Saliva/Rinse/Dry;GroupV:Adhesive/Saliva/Rin se/Dry/Adhesive. Cylinders of resin composite (Tetric N-Ceram)were placed on the treated area. After 24-h storage in distilledwater, shear bond strength was determined using a universaltesting machine. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVAand Tukey HSD test (p 0.05). Group IVand V showed statistically lower bond strength values than othergroups tested (p0.05). Conclusion: Following saliva contamination, only air-dryingresulted similar bond strength values to non-contaminatedgroup. Water-rinsing and then air-drying led to lower bondstrength values. Regardless of the procedures, reapplication of adhesive did not affect the bond strength

Özet

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, tükürük kontaminasyonu vedevamında farklı işlemlerin polimerize olmuş bir üniversaladezivin dentine bağlanma dayanımı üzerindeki etkisinideğerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma için 70 adet çekilmiş insan azı dişikullanıldı. Dişler meziodistal olarak boylamasına kesildikten sonrastandart bir dentin yüzeyi elde etmek için aşındırıldı. Dişlereüniversal adeziv (Adhese, Ivoclar/Vivadent) uygulanıp polimerizeedildikten sonra tükürük kontaminasyon yöntemlerine (n=14)göre rastgele beş gruba ayrıldı: Grup I-Kontaminasyon yok(kontrol); Grup II: Adeziv / Tükürük /Kurutma; Grup III: Adeziv/Tükürük /Kurutma /Adeziv; Grup IV: Adeziv /Tükürük /Yıkama/Kurutma; Grup V: Adeziv /Tükürük /Yıkama /Kurutma /Adeziv.Yüzeylere kompozit silindirler (Tetric N-Ceram) uygulandı.Örnekler distile suda 24 saat bekletildkten sonra kesmebağlanma dayanımları üniversal test cihazı kullanılarak ölçüldü.Veriler tek yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testikullanılarak analiz edildi (p 0.05). Grup IV veV, test edilen diğer gruplara göre istatistiksel olarak daha düşükbağlanma dayanımı değerleri gösterdi (p 0.05). Sonuç: Tükürük kontaminasyonu sonrasında yalnızca hava ilekurutma, kontrol grubuna benzer bağlanma dayanımı değerleri ilesonuçlanmıştır. Suyla durulama ve devamında havayla kurutmaise düşük bağlanma dayanımı değerlerine sebep olmuştur.Yapılan işlemlerden bağımsız olarak, adezivin tekrar uygulanmasıbağlanma dayanımını etkilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERAL, E., YAZICI, A. R., ATALAY, C., USLU, A., ERTAN, A. A. (2022). Effect of Saliva Contamination and Subsequent DifferentProcedures On Bond Strength of a Cured UniversalAdhesive. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 611–616. https://ajindex.com/articles/591404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Munaga S, Chitumalla R, Kubigiri SK, Rawtiya M, Khan S, Sajjan P. Effect of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of a new self-etch adhesive system to dentin. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(1):31-4
  2. Neelagiri K, Kundabala M, Shashi RA, Thomas MS, Parolia A. Effects of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on shear bond strength of self-etch dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2010;13(2):71-5
  3. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of saliva contamination on dentin bond strength using all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2006;8(5):311-8
  4. Park JW, Lee KC. The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2004;29(4):437-42
  5. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, Tome AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater 1996;12(4):262-71
  6. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multimode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40(6):475-84
  7. Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Yiu C, et al. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2004;83(6):459-64
  8. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B. Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2015;31(3):308-14
  9. Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ, Jr., Heymann HO, Sigurdsson A. Effects of saliva contamination on resinresin bond strength. Dent Mater 2004;20(1):37-44. 10.Townsend RD, Dunn WJ. The effect of saliva contamination on enamel and dentin using a self-etching adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(7):895-901; quiz 1036, 38. 11.Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int 1998;29(9):567-72. 12.Darabi F, Tavangar M, Davalloo R. Effect of different decontamination procedures from a saliva-contaminated cured bonding system (Single Bond). Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(4):399-403
  10. Jiang Q, Pan H, Liang B, Fu B, Hannig M. Effect of saliva contamination and decontamination on bovine enamel bond strength of four self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 2010;35(2):194-202. 14.Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43(7):765-76. 15.Van Mee