Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis Drops On Oral Pathogens: AnIn Vitro Study

Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate theantimicrobial effectiveness of various propolis drops found easilyin Turkey against two oral pathogens; Streptococcus mutans andEnterococcus faecalis.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Methods: Seven different propolis drops (Group 1 to 7: UmayHerbal Organic Propolis, Bee'o Up [15%], Propoli EVSP, BrazilianGreen Liquid Propolis, Eğriçayır Propolis, Bee'o Up [30%],Biostore Propolis) were included in the study.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Group 6 was found significantly more effective on E.faecalis than other propolis drops (p

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate theantimicrobial effectiveness of various propolis drops found easilyin Turkey against two oral pathogens; Streptococcus mutans andEnterococcus faecalis. Methods: Seven different propolis drops (Group 1 to 7: UmayHerbal Organic Propolis, Bee'o Up [15%], Propoli EVSP, BrazilianGreen Liquid Propolis, Eğriçayır Propolis, Bee'o Up [30%],Biostore Propolis) were included in the study. Antimicrobial effectof drops was investigated by the agar plate diffusion method. Petridishes were prepared with Brain-Heart Infusion broth. 100 µl ofmicroorganisms and 10 µl of each propolis were planted to thesepetri dishes from a broth culture. Inhibition zones formed on the24th hour were measured in mm's and each experimental groupwas photographed. Data were compared by Mann Whitney-U test. Results: Only water-based propolis of the present study (Group1) formed no inhibition zone against both oral pathogens andalcohol-based groups 4 and 5 formed no zone only against thelatter. Group 5 showed significantly the highest antimicrobial effectagainst S. mutans, however that group showed no influence on E.faecalis. Group 6 was found significantly more effective on E.faecalis than other propolis drops (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de kolaylıkla bulunançeşitli propolis damlalarının iki oral patojene (Streptococcusmutans ve Enterococcus faecalis) karşı antimikrobiyaletkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya yedi farklı propolis damlası (1'den7'ye gruplar: Umay Herbal Organic Propolis, Bee'o Up [%15],Propoli EVSP, Brazilian Green Liquid Propolis, Eğriçayır Propolis,Bee'o Up [%30], Biostore Propolis) dahil edildi. Bakteriler 100 µl,her bir propolis örneği ise10 µl olacak şekilde yayma ekim tekniğiile Brain-Heart Infusion agar besiyerine ekildi. Petri kutuları bakteriüremesi için 24 saat inkübasyona bırakıldı ve sonuçta oluşan zonçapları ölçüldü. Her deney grubu fotoğraflandı. İstatistiksel analizMann Whitney-U testi kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Su bazlı propolis (Grup 1) iki oral patojene karşı dainhibisyon bölgesi oluşturamamıştır. Alkol bazlı propolislerden ise,yalnızca 4. ve 5. gruplar E. faecalis' e karşı etkinlikgösterememiştir. S. mutanslara karşı en yüksek antimikrobiyal etki5. grup'ta görülürken, aynı grup E. faecalis üzerinde herhangi biretki gösterememiştir. 6. grup, E. faecalis üzerinde diğer propolisdamlalarından anlamlı olarak daha etkili bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, M. M., OZAN, G., VATANSEVER, C. (2022). Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis Drops On Oral Pathogens: AnIn Vitro Study. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 673–678. https://ajindex.com/articles/591403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

Ardizzoni A, Pericolini E, Paulone S, Orsi CF, Castagnoli A, Oliva I, et al. In vitro effects of commercial mouthwashes on several virulence traits of Candida albicans, viridans streptococci and Enterococcus faecalis colonizing the oral cavity. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207262
Nobbs AH, Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF. Streptococcus adherence and colonization. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73:407–50
Luca D, Passos M, Freires IA, Gala-García A, Santos VR, Vale MP, et al. The anti-caries activity and toxicity of an experimental propolis-containing varnish. Braz Oral Res, 2017;31:e45
Tazegül S, Koçak MM, Topuz Ö, Özcan S, Çekiç AA, Erten H. Üç Farklı Solüsyonun Streptococcus mutans ve Enterococcus faecalis Üzerine Antimikrobiyal Etkinliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. EÜ Diş Hek Fak Der. 2006;27:153-158
Ardizzoni A, Blasi E, Rimoldi C, Giardino L, Ambu E, Righi E, et al. An in vitro and ex vivo study on two antibiotic-based endodontic irrigants: a challenge to sodium hypochlorite. New Microbiol. 2009;32:57–66
Kouidhi B, Zmantar T, Mahdouani K, Hentati H, Bakhrouf A. Antibiotic resistance and adhesion properties of oral Enterococci associated to dental caries. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1):155
Rams TE, Feik D, Mortensen JE, Degener JE, van Winkelhoff AJ. Antibiotic susceptibility of periodontal Enterococcus faecalis. J Periodontol. 2013;84:1026–33
Anderson AC, Jonas D, Huber I, Karygianni L, Wölber J, Hellwig E et al. Enterococcus faecalis from Food, Clinical Specimens, and Oral Sites: Prevalence of Virulence Factors in Association with Biofilm Formation. Front Microbiol. 2016;6:1534
Savitha A, SriRekha A, Vijay R, Champa C, Jaykumar T. An in vivo comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan, chlorhexidine gluconate gel and their combination as an intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis in failed endodontic cases using real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(3):360-366. 10.FDI World Dental Federation. Oral health and noncommunicable diseases. [Internet]. Switzerland: World Dental Federation; 2011 [cited Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.fdiworlddental.org/what-wedo/advocacy/oral-health-and-noncommunicablediseases 11.Freires IA, Alencar SM, Rosalen PL. A pharmacological perspective on the use of Brazilian Red Propolis and its isolated compounds against human diseases. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;110:267-79. 12.Koo H, Gomes BPFA, Rosalen PL, Ambrosano GMB, Park YK, Cury JA. In vitro antimicrobial a