Journals / Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Müşterek görevler için gerekli NATO dil standartları ve bu standartların bir kamu örgütünde uygulamaları

NATO stanag language proficiency levels for joint missions and its implementations at a state organization

Pages
71–90
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it is suggested that four language skills should be taken into consideration in evaluation and the current materials should be supported by some auxiliary documents to meet professional needs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkish Armed Forces have been participating in joint missions together with other nations for decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, this study aims to specify personnel s views and their language proficiency levels in terms of NATO Stanag Level 3 objectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is suggested that four language skills should be taken into consideration in evaluation and the current materials should be supported by some auxiliary documents to meet professional needs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Turkish Armed Forces have been participating in joint missions together with other nations for decades. Since English is the medium of instruction in these missions, participating members should have NATO Standards in terms of language proficiency levels in four skills. Therefore, this study aims to specify personnel s views and their language proficiency levels in terms of NATO Stanag Level 3 objectives. Subjects are the personnel (n=30) attending English courses at a state organization. NATO Stanag Level 3 questionnaire and NATO Stanag 6001 Level 3 exam were administered to them at the end of the English course. Findings prove that subjects need improvement in speaking and writing skills though they consider themselves comparatively better in reading and listening skills. As a result, it is suggested that four language skills should be taken into consideration in evaluation and the current materials should be supported by some auxiliary documents to meet professional needs.

Özet

Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri onlarca yıldır diğer uluslarla birlikte müşterek görevlere katılmaktadır. Bu görevlerde İngilizce ortak iletişim aracı olduğu için, katılımcıların dört dil becerisinde NATO standartlarına sahip olması gerekmektedir. Bu sebeple, bu çalışma uluslararası görevler için zorunlu olan NATO Stanag 6001 3. seviye dil yeterlilikleri konusunda personelin görüşlerini ve mevcut dil yeterlilik seviyelerini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Örneklem grup, İngilizce kursunu tamamlayan 30 personelden seçilmiş olup, bu gruba NATO Standartları 3. Seviye Anketi ve NATO Standartları 3.Seviye Sınavı uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, örneklem grubun okuma ve dinleme becerilerinde göreceli olarak kendilerini yeterli görmelerine rağmen yazma ve konuşma becerilerinde gelişmeye ihtiyaç olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, değerlendirmelerde dört dil becerisinin dikkate alınması ve mevcut ders kitaplarının mesleki ihtiyaçları karşılayacak şekilde yardımcı malzemelerle desteklenmesi tavsiye edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLAK, E. (2022). Müşterek görevler için gerekli NATO dil standartları ve bu standartların bir kamu örgütünde uygulamaları. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 71–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/591166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. BILC Constitution. (2004). 30 Mart 2011 de http://www.dlielc.org/bilc/Constitution2004.doc adresinden alıntı yapılmıştır. Brown, J. (1995). The Elements of language curriculum. Boston: Heinle&Heinle Defense Language Institute (2000). Materials Development Notebook. U.S.A. Department of Air Force (1993). Information for Designers of Instructional System, AF Handbook. Washington D.C.: Headquarters Dubeau, Julie. (2006). An Exploratory study of OPI ratings across NATO countries using the NATO STANAG 6001 scale. (Masters Thesis). Carleton University, Canada. Herzog, M. (2005). An overview of the history of the ILR language proficiency skill level descriptions and scale. Interagency Language Roundtable: History of the ILR Scale. 25 Ekim 2010 tarihinde http//www.govtilr.org/ILRscale_hist.html adresinden alıntı yapılmıştır. Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle&Heinle Green, R. ve D. Wall. (2005) Language testing in the military:Problems, politics and progress. Language Testing. Vol. 22 no. 3 379-398
  2. Hutchinson, T. ve Waters A. (2006). English for specific purposes. U.K.: C.U.P. Işık, A. (1999) Teaching EFL through english or content: Implications for foreign language learning, (Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation). Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
  3. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, Mayıs 2013, 12 (1), 71-90. 87 Işık, A. (2005). Bir yabancı dil nasıl öğrenilir? Ankara: Kara Harp Okulu Basımevi. Turkish Law Code 2803 on Organization, Duties and Powers of Turkish Gendarmerie. NATO STANAG 6001, Ed.2, (2003). 25 Mart 2009 da http://www.dlielc.org/bilc/Sta_Edit2 adresinden alıntı yapılmıştır. Pehlivan, Erdal (2003) Analysis of ELT at TAFA advanced english course from content based instruction perspective. (Unpublished Masters Thesis). İstanbul University, İstanbul.
  4. Reviere, R. (1996). Needs assessment: A creative and practical guide for social scientists. U.S.A:Taylor & Francis. Richards, J.ve Rodgers T. (1997). Approaches and methods in language teaching. U.S.A.: C.U.P. Sarı, Rahim. (2003) A Suggested english language teaching program for Gülhane Military Medical Academy. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  5. White, R.V. (1988). The ELT curriculum: Design, innovation and management. Oxford: Blackwell.