SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

Effective recognition of multiple anions by an azobenzene Al 3+ system

Ye ZHANG
Zhangfa TONG
Hai-Bo LIU
Ping JIA
Jing WANG
Pages
905–916
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The DHABAl 3+ system can determine the concentration ranges of H2PO − 4 with the naked eye and quantify CO2− 3 , SO2− 3 , HPO2− 4 , and HCO − 3 through UV-Vis spectra

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A ready-to-use multifunctional coordinative system, 2,2 -dihydroxyazobenzene aluminum (III) (DHABAl 3+), was created to recognize several anions effectively through three channels, namely colorimetric detection, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Under naked eye visualization, the H2PO − 4 can be readily distinguished from the other anions by the DHAB Al 3+ system through a change in color from reddish-orange to light yellow.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The DHABAl 3+ system can determine the concentration ranges of H2PO − 4 with the naked eye and quantify CO2− 3 , SO2− 3 , HPO2− 4 , and HCO − 3 through UV-Vis spectra
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A ready-to-use multifunctional coordinative system, 2,2 -dihydroxyazobenzene aluminum (III) (DHABAl 3+), was created to recognize several anions effectively through three channels, namely colorimetric detection, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Under naked eye visualization, the H2PO − 4 can be readily distinguished from the other anions by the DHAB Al 3+ system through a change in color from reddish-orange to light yellow. H2PO − 4 was qualitatively detected by using UV-Vis and fluorescence spectra. Differentiating SO2− 3 , HPO2− 4 , and HCO − 3 anions colorimetrically is difficult; thus, CO2− 3 , SO2− 3 , HPO2− 4 , and HCO − 3 were discriminated by adopting distinct changes in the UV-Vis spectra. CO2− 3 , HPO2− 4 , and HCO − 3 were accurately quantified using fluorescence spectra. The DHABAl 3+ system responded to H2PO − 4 and CO2− 3 via a sensing mechanism based on a displacement approach. By contrast, the system responded to SO2− 3 , HPO2− 4 , and HCO − 3 based on a binding site signaling subunit approach. The DHABAl 3+ system can determine the concentration ranges of H2PO − 4 with the naked eye and quantify CO2− 3 , SO2− 3 , HPO2− 4 , and HCO − 3 through UV-Vis spectra

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHANG, Y., TONG, Z., LIU, H., JIA, P., WANG, J. (2022). Effective recognition of multiple anions by an azobenzene Al 3+ system. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 905–916. https://ajindex.com/articles/589289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Thomas, S. W.; Joly, G. D. 3rd; Swager, T. M. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1339–1386
  2. Sessler, J. L.; Cho, D. G.; Lynch, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16518–16519
  3. Dinckaya, E.; Sezgint¨urk, M. K.; Akyilmaz, E.; Ertas, F. N. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 1540–1544
  4. Baker, J. T. Material Safety Data Sheet 1998, 3242
  5. Yan, H.; Li, H. Sens. Actuators B 2010, 148, 81–86
  6. Martnez-Mez, R.; Sancenn, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4419–4476
  7. Gale, P. A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 82–86
  8. Dydio, P.; Lichosyt, D.; Jurczak, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2971–2985
  9. Galbraith, E.; James, T. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3831–3842
  10. Zhao, Q.; Li, F.; Huang, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3007–3030
  11. Li, X.; Gao, X.; Shi, W.; Ma, H. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 590–659
  12. Santos-Figueroa, Luis E.; Moragues, M. E.; Climent, E.; Agostini, A.; Mart´ınez-M´a˜nez, R.; Sancen´on, F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3489–3613
  13. Kaur, M.; Choi, D. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 58–77
  14. Samanta, S.; Das, S.; Biswas, P. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 202, 23–30
  15. Weng, J.; Mei, Q.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Tong, B.; Fan, Q.; Ling, Q.; Huang, W. Analyst 2013, 138, 6607–6616
  16. Song, E. J.; Kim, H.; Hwang, I. H.; Kim, K. B.; Kim, A. R.; Noh, I.; Kim, C. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 195, 36–43
  17. Ding, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Xie, Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00436a
  18. Chen, K.; Schmittel, M. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5756–5759
  19. Curiel, D.; M´as-Montoya, M.; S´anchez, G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 284, 19–66
  20. Gimeno, N.; Li, X.; Durrant, J. R.; Vilar, R. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 3006–3012
  21. Gale, P. A.; Caltagirone, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00179f
  22. Lee, K.; Lee, H. Y.; Lee, K. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5447–5449
  23. Abildgaard, J.; Hansen, P. E.; Josephsen, J.; Hansen, B. K.V.; Sørensen, H. O.; Larsen, S. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2006, 359, 4493–4502
  24. Iki, N.; Hoshino, H.; Yotsuyanagi, T. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 4812–4820
  25. Emond, M.; Saux, T. L.; Maurin, S.; Baudin, J. B.; Plasson, R.; Jullien, L. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 8822–8831
  26. Wang, J.; Ha, C. S. Sens. Actuators B 2010, 146, 373–380
  27. Wang, J.; Ha, C. S. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 1846–1851
  28. Wang, J.; Ha, C. S. Analyst 2010, 135, 1214–1218
  29. Kaneko, E.; Ishida, A.; Deguehi, Y.; Yotsuyanagi, T. Chem. Lett. 1994, 23, 1615–1618
  30. Mizuguchi, H.; Yasuda, H.; Kaneko, E.; Yotsuyanagi, T. Chem. Lett. 1997, 26, 895–896
  31. Mizuguchi, H.; Kaneko, E.; Yotsuyanagi, T. Analyst 2000, 125, 1667–1