Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Should Scleral Buckling Surgery be Applied only on Young and Phakic Patients?

Pages
101–104
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The duration from diagnosis to surgery was 27.2±6.0 hours in Group 1, and 90.1±30.7 hours in Group 2 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the anatomical and functional results of scleral buckling (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The demographic features of patients, the status of lens and macula, the duration between diagnosis and surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior-posterior segment examination were recorded before surgery, at 1st month, 3rd month and final visits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The duration from diagnosis to surgery was 27.2±6.0 hours in Group 1, and 90.1±30.7 hours in Group 2 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the anatomical and functional results of scleral buckling (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients. Materials and Methods: The records of uncomplicated RRD patients were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of surgery (SB or PPV). The demographic features of patients, the status of lens and macula, the duration between diagnosis and surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior-posterior segment examination were recorded before surgery, at 1st month, 3rd month and final visits. The obtained data were compared between groups. Results: The study was included 14 patients who underwent SB (Group 1) and 33 patients who underwent PPV. The mean age was 60.1±13.9 (16-87) years. Any difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, lens status, and macular involvement was detected (p>0.05). The duration from diagnosis to surgery was 27.2±6.0 hours in Group 1, and 90.1±30.7 hours in Group 2 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayikcioglu, O. C., Karahan, E., Vural, G. S., Gomleksiz, E., Guler, C. (2022). Should Scleral Buckling Surgery be Applied only on Young and Phakic Patients?. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 101–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/588997

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ghazi NG, Green WR. Pathology and pathogenesis of retinal detachment. Eye [Internet]. 2002 Jul 10 [cited 2021 May 2]
  2. Available from: www.nature.com/eye 2. Byer NE. What happens to untreated asymptomatic retinal breaks, and are they affected by posterior vitreous detachment? Ophthalmology [Internet]. 1998 Jun 1 [cited 2021 May 2]
  3. 105(6):1045-50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/9627655/ 3. Gonın J. The Treatment Of Detached Retına By Searıng The Retınal Tears. Arch Ophthalmol [Internet]. 1930 Nov 1 [cited 2021 May 2]
  4. 4(5):621-5. Available from: https://jamanetwork. com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/608747 4. Custodis E. Bedeutet die Plombenaufnaehung auf die Sklera einen Fortschritt in der operativen Behandlung der Netzhautabloesung. Ber Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges. 1953
  5. Schepens CL, Okamura ID, Brockhurst RJ. The Scleral Buckling Procedures: 1. Surgical Techniques and Management. AMAArch Ophthalmol [Internet]. 1957 [cited 2021 May 2]
  6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13478226/ 6. Hwang JC. Regional practice patterns for retinal detachment repair in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2021 May 2]
  7. 153(6):1125-8. Available from: https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22321800/ 7. Schwartz SG, Flynn HW, Mieler WF. Update on retinal detachment surgery [Internet]. Vol. 24, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  8. 2013 [cited 2021 May 2]. p. 255-61. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/23429600/ 8. Hilton G, Machemer R, Michels R, Okun E, Schepens C, Schwartz A. The Classification of Retinal Detachment with Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 1983 [cited 2021 May 2]
  9. 90(2):121-5. Available from: https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6856248/ 9. McLaughlin MD, Hwang JC. Trends in Vitreoretinal Procedures for Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000 to 2014. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2017 May 1 [cited 2021 May 2]
  10. 124(5):667-73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28283281/ 10. Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Weiss C, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH. Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Clinical Study. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2021 May 2]
  11. 114(12). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18054633/ 11. Schaal S, Sherman MP, Barr CC, Kaplan HJ. Primary retinal detachment repair: Comparison of 1-year outcomes of four surgical technique