Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers of Patients Diagnosed with Cancer

Kanser Tanısı Konan Hastaların Eşleri ve Bakım Vericileri İçin Destekleyici Bakım Gereksinimleri Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Pages
262–269
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The SCNS-P&C can be used infuture nursing research and practice as an assessment tool for partners and caregivers of cancer patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to culturally adapt and test the psychometric properties of the Turkish versionof the SCNS-P&C.Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 228 cancer patients who were being treated at an oncology hospital.The data were evaluated using SPSS 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA) statistics software.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The validity of the structure wasdetermined using confirmatory factor analysis, which was performed with AMOS 21.0.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The SCNS-P&C can be used infuture nursing research and practice as an assessment tool for partners and caregivers of cancer patients.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to culturally adapt and test the psychometric properties of the Turkish versionof the SCNS-P&C.Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 228 cancer patients who were being treated at an oncology hospital.The data were evaluated using SPSS 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA) statistics software. The validity of the structure wasdetermined using confirmatory factor analysis, which was performed with AMOS 21.0. Psychometric testing includedinternal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient), Spearman-Brown reliability, and validity analyses (confirmatory factor analysis and content validity).Results: The Cronbach’s alpha value of the survey was 0.96, and the Spearman-Brown value of the survey was 0.86.The model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/SD=2.53, GFI=0.73, IFI=0.87, CFI=0.87, RMSEA=0.08, andRMR=0.088).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the SCNS-P&C was found to be reliable and valid for Turkish partners and caregiversof cancer patients, which means that its use can lead to a better understanding of needs. The SCNS-P&C can be used infuture nursing research and practice as an assessment tool for partners and caregivers of cancer patients.

Özet

Amaç: Kanser hastalarının ve yakınlarının, kanser tanısı alma, tedavi süreci ve tedavi sonrasında ortaya çıkan gereksinimlerinin karşılanabilmesine yönelik eylemler, “destekleyici bakım uygulamaları” olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı Kanser Tanısı Konan Hastaların Eşleri ve Bakım Vericileri İçin Destekleyici Bakım Gereksinimleri Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması Türkçe’ye uyarlanması, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasının yapılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmanın örneklemini bir onkoloji hastanesinde tedavi görmekte olan 228 hasta eşi oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde SPSS 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA) istatistik programı kullanılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile elde edilen yapının doğrulanması AMOS 21.0 tarafından sağlanmıştır. Psikometrik test olarak iç tutarlılık güvenilirliği (Cronbach's alpha katsayısı), spearman-brown güvenilirliği, geçerlilik analizleri (doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve içerik geçerliliği) yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa kat sayısı 0.96, Spearman-Brown değeri 0.86 olarak bulunmuştur. Model doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile doğrulanmıştır (χ2 /SD=2.53, GFI=0.73, IFI=0.87, CFI=0.87, RMSEA=0.08, and RMR=0.088). Sonuç: Kanser hastasına bakım veren eşlerde Kanser Tanısı Konan Hastaların Eşleri ve Bakım Vericileri İçin Destekleyici Bakım Gereksinimleri Ölçeği’nin Türkçe verisyonu geçerli ve güvenilir bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin klinik araştırmalarında kullanılması bakım veren eşlerin gereksinimlerinin daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öz, F., Özbaş, A. A., Kılıç, S. (2022). Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers of Patients Diagnosed with Cancer. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 262–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/588656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Haun MW, Sklenarova H, Villalobos M, Thomas M, Brechtel A, Löwe B, et al. Depression, anxiety and disease-related distress in couples affected by advanced lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2014;86:274–80
  2. Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, et al. When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 2015;121:1513–9
  3. Öz F. Psychosocial Nursing in Cancer. Turkiye Klinikleri J Intern Med Nurs-Special Topics 2015;1:46–52
  4. Lund L, Ross L, Petersen MA, Groenvold M. The interaction between informal cancer caregivers and health care professionals: a survey of caregivers' experiences of problems and unmet needs. Support Care Cancer 2015;23:1719–33
  5. Chen SC, Chiou SC, Yu CJ, Lee YH, Liao WY, Hsieh PY, et al. The unmet supportive care needs-what advanced lung cancer patients' caregivers need and related factors. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:2999–3009
  6. Kocaman Yıldırım N, Kaçmaz N, Özkan M. Unmet Care Needs in Advanced Stage Cancer Patients. J Psy Nurs 2013;4:153–158
  7. Lambert S, Bellamy T, Girgis A. Routine assessment of unmet needs in individuals with advanced cancer and their caregivers: A qualitative study of the palliative care needs assessment tool (PC-NAT). J Psychosoc Oncol 2018;36:82–96
  8. Oberoi DV, White V, Jefford M, Giles GG, Bolton D, Davis I, et al. Caregivers' information needs and their 'experiences of care' during treatment are associated with elevated anxiety and depression: a cross-sectional study of the caregivers of renal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:4177–86
  9. Shaw JM, Young JM, Butow PN, Badgery-Parker T, Durcinoska I, Harrison JD, et al. Improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of people with poor prognosis gastrointestinal cancers: a randomized controlled trial (Family Connect). Support Care Cancer 2016;24:585–95
  10. Aubin M, Vézina L, Verreault R, Simard S, Desbiens JF, Tremblay L, et alEffectiveness of an intervention to improve supportive care for family caregivers of patients with lung cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:304
  11. Schulte F. Biologic, psychological, and social health needs in cancer care: how far have we come? Curr Oncol 2014;21:161–2
  12. Zebrack BJ, Block R, Hayes-Lattin B, Embry L, Aguilar C, Meeske KA, et al. Psychosocial service use and unmet need among recently diagnosed adolescent and young ad