Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Developing Utkan Epidemic Anxiety Scale and analysing its psychometric properties

Pages
140–145
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Structural and internal validity of the scale was assessed to determine overall validity of the scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To develop the “Utkan epidemic anxiety scale” for measuring the anxiety levels regarding an epidemic inthe general population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Trial survey forms comprising 20 linguistically and psychometrically verified statements were distributed to1037 people; the mean age of the participants was 28.6±9.9 years (age range, 15–68 years), and 72% of the participantswere women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Structural and internal validity of the scale was assessed to determine overall validity of the scale.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To develop the “Utkan epidemic anxiety scale” for measuring the anxiety levels regarding an epidemic inthe general population. Methods: Trial survey forms comprising 20 linguistically and psychometrically verified statements were distributed to1037 people; the mean age of the participants was 28.6±9.9 years (age range, 15–68 years), and 72% of the participantswere women. Structural and internal validity of the scale was assessed to determine overall validity of the scale. Factoranalysis was performed to check the structural validity, and subgroup-super group comparisons were performed todetermine internal validity. The reliability of the scale was measuring by calculating the Cronbach’s alpha (α) reliabilitycoefficient and parallel form consistency. Results: The Utkan epidemic anxiety scale was one-dimensional, consisted of 9 items, and provided explanation re garding 70.8% of the variance related to epidemic anxiety. The scale consists of points ranging from 0–36, and higherpoints indicate a higher level of epidemic anxiety. The Cronbach α reliability coefficient was 0.94, which indicated ahigh reliability of the scale. Conclusion: Results of this study showed that the “Utkan epidemic anxiety scale” provided valid and reliable measure ments of epidemic anxiety among the general population.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKANLI, A., KANBAY, Y., FIRAT, M., AKÇAM, A., UTKAN, M. (2022). Developing Utkan Epidemic Anxiety Scale and analysing its psychometric properties. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 140–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/588632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Zubaroğlu Yanardağ M, Say Şahin D. An examination on trait anxiety and trait depression in the elderly ındividuals. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet 2019;30:37–55
  2. Cohen SD, Cukor D, Kimmel PL. Anxiety in Patients Treated with Hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;11:2250–5
  3. Crocq MA. A history of anxiety: from Hippocrates to DSM. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2015;17:319–25
  4. Schuyler D. Anxiety. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2016;18
  5. Sapra A, Bhandari P, Sharma S, Chanpura T, Lopp L. Using generalized anxiety disorder-2 (GAD-2) and GAD-7 in a primary care setting. Cureus 2020;12:e8224
  6. Yıldız E, Yeniçeri EN, Öngel K. Application of state-trait anxiety scale (STAI-TX) in randomly selected ındividuals and results. Smyrna Tıp Derg 2019;1:19–24
  7. WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020. Retrieved May 1, 2020, from
  8. Öztürk İ, Akalın S, Özgüner İ, Şakiroğlu M. Covid-19 Salgınının ve karantinanın psikolojik etkileri. J Turkish Stud 2020;15:885– 903
  9. Bozkurt Y, Zeybek Z, Aşkın R. COVİD-19 pandemisi: psikolojik etkileri ve terapötik müdahaleler. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sos Bilimler Dergisi 2020;19:304–18
  10. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e203976
  11. Konkan R, Şenormanci Ö, Güçlü O, Aydin E, Sungur MZ. Validity and reliability study for the Turkish adaptation of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7)scale. Noropsikiyatri Arsivi 2013;50:53–8
  12. Aslan R. Tarihten günümüze pandemiler: Pandemiler ve Covid-19. Ayrıntı Dergisi 2020;85:35–41
  13. Parıldar H. Infectious disease outbreaks in history. J Tepecik Educ Res Hosp. 2020;30:19–26
  14. Doğan MM, Düzel B. Covid-19 Özelinde korku-kaygı düzeyleri. J Turkish Stud 2020;15:739–52
  15. Korkmazer F, Selamzade F, Bostan S. Azerbaycan sağlık çalışanlarının COVID-19 pandemisine yönelik algılarının ölçülmesine yönelik bir araştırma. J Turkish Stud 2020;15:691–702
  16. Turan İ, Şimşek Ü, Aslan H. The use and analysis of likert scales and likert-type ıtems in educational research. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2015;30:186–203
  17. De Wellis R. Ölçek Geliştirme. 3rd ed., Ankara: Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık; 2014. p. 93–109
  18. Erkuş A. Psikolojide Ölçme ve Ölçek Geliştirme-1. 2nd ed., Ankara: PAGEM Akedemi; 2014. p. 78–101
  19. Şeker H, Gençdoğan B. Psikolojide ve Eğitimde Ölçme Aracı Gelişti