Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Moral Injury Symptom Scale- Healthcare Professional

Pages
67–75
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MISS-HP is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate moral injury in healthcare professionals

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study was carried out to examine the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Healthcare Professional (MISS-HP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This methodological study was performed with 125 nurses working in hospitals in Turkey in March-April 2021 using online forms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MISS-HP is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate moral injury in healthcare professionals
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study was carried out to examine the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Healthcare Professional (MISS-HP). Methods: This methodological study was performed with 125 nurses working in hospitals in Turkey in March-April 2021 using online forms. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and IBM SPSS AMOS Version 21.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) were used to perform the analysis. Results: The linguistic validity of the MISS-HP was assessed using the translation-back translation technique and ex- pert opinions. The sample size was found to be sufficient and suitable for factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.888, chi- squared=1067.959, degrees of freedom [DF]=45, p=0.000). A 3-factor structure with 10 items was determined, and the factor load of the items ranged from 0.84 to 0.94. The fit index values were acceptable and within the limits of perfect agreement (minimum discrepancy/DF [CMIN/DF]=1.712, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA]=0.076, stan- dardized root mean squared residual [SRMR]=0.045, adjusted goodness-of-fit index [AGFI]=0.856, goodness-of-fit index [GFI]=0.916, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI]=0.970, relative fit index [RFI]=0.930, incremental fit index [IFI]=0.979, normed fit index [NFI]=0.950, comparative fit index [CFI]=0.978). Average variance extracted values >0.50 and composite reliability values >0.70 for each factor confirmed convergent and divergent validity of the scale. The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.91 and the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.95. There was a statistically significant, moderate, positive correlation was seen between the Compassion Fatigue-Short Scale (CF-SS) and the MISS-HP scores (r=0.446, p=0.000). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MISS-HP is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate moral injury in healthcare professionals

🔖

Cite This Article

Üstün, G. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Moral Injury Symptom Scale- Healthcare Professional. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 67–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/588615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Shay J. Moral injury. Psychoanal Psychol 2014;31:182–91
  2. Antonelli M. Moral injury. Am J Psychoanal 2017;77:406–16
  3. Hall NA, Everson AT, Billingsley MR, Miller MB. Moral injury, mental health and behavioural health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021
  4. Koenig HG, Youssef NA, Pearce M. Assessment of moral injury in veterans and active duty military personnel with PTSD: A review. Front Psychiatry 2019;10:443
  5. Mantri S, Lawson JM, Wang Z, Koenig HG. Identifying moral injury in healthcare professionals: The moral injury symptom scale-HP. J Relig Health 2020;59:2323–40
  6. Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus out- break is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:228–9
  7. Williamson V, Murphy D, Greenberg N. COVID-19 and expe- riences of moral injury in front-line key workers. Occup Med (Lond) 2020;70:317–9
  8. Greenberg N, Docherty M, Gnanapragasam S, Wessely S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ 2020;368:m1211
  9. White DB, Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA 2020;323:1773–4
  10. Tracy DK, Tarn M, Eldridge R, Cooke J, Calder JDF, Greenberg N. What should be done to support the mental health of healthcare staff treating COVID-19 patients? Br J Psychiatry 2020;217:537–9
  11. Hines SE, Chin KH, Glick DR, Wickwire EM. Trends in moral in- jury, distress, and resilience factors among healthcare workers at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:488
  12. Borges LM, Barnes SM, Farnsworth JK, Bahraini NH, Bren- ner LA. A commentary on moral injury among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Trauma 2020;12:S138–40
  13. Zuzelo PR. Making do during a pandemic: Morally distressing and injurious events. Holist Nurs Pract 2020;34:259–61
  14. Williamson V, Stevelink SAM, Greenberg N. Occupational moral injury and mental health: Systematic review and meta- analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2018;212:339–46
  15. Koenig HG, Ames D, Youssef NA, Oliver JP, Volk F, Teng EJ, et al. The moral injury symptom scale-military version. J Relig Health 2018;57:249–65
  16. Zhizhong W, Koenig HG, Yan T, Jing W, Mu S, Hongyu L, et al. Psychometric properties of the moral injury symptom scale among Chinese health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry 2020;20:556. 1