Journals / PLANLAMA / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Periodic Manufacturing Industry Clustering Analysis in Yozgat Using the Location Quotient Method (2006-2016)

Yozgat’ın İmalat Sanayi Kümelenmesinin Lokasyon Katsayısı Yöntemiyle Dönemsel İncelenmesi (2006-2016)

Journal
PLANLAMA
Pages
116–126
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This research was performed using the fourth level of the equivalent to the subregions of nomenclature of units for territorial statistics (NUTS-4), and is one ofthe first such studies of Yozgat.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is an analysis of manufacturing industry clustering inYozgat in 5-year periods during the years of 2006 to 2016 usingthe location quotient method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thisresearch investigated which cities in Yozgat have manufacturingindustry clusters, which cities’ manufacturing industries meritfurther investment, compatibility with 2013 regional planningproposals, and tendencies in manufacturing industry clusteringover the years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This research was performed using the fourth level of the equivalent to the subregions of nomenclature of units for territorial statistics (NUTS-4), and is one ofthe first such studies of Yozgat.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is an analysis of manufacturing industry clustering inYozgat in 5-year periods during the years of 2006 to 2016 usingthe location quotient method. This method is a readily accessiblemeans of performing a spatial evaluation of statistical data. Thisresearch investigated which cities in Yozgat have manufacturingindustry clusters, which cities’ manufacturing industries meritfurther investment, compatibility with 2013 regional planningproposals, and tendencies in manufacturing industry clusteringover the years. According to the number of employees in Yozgatin 2006, there were only manufacturing industry clusters in thedistricts of Yerköy and Sorgun. There were manufacturing industry clusters in 6 more regions in 2011. By 2016, the districts ofYerköy, Sorgun, Boğazlıyan, and Çayıralan had manufacturing industry clusters. Another important result is that the proximity ofBoğazlıyan and Çayıralan to the city of Kayseri provides them withwidespread trickle-down effects. This research was performed using the fourth level of the equivalent to the subregions of nomenclature of units for territorial statistics (NUTS-4), and is one ofthe first such studies of Yozgat.

Özet

Bu çalışma Yozgat’ın imalat sanayi kümelenmesi 2006-2011-2016 yıllarında beşer yıllık dönemde Lokasyon Katsayısı yöntemiyle araştırılmasını kapsamaktadır. Lokasyon Katsayısı istatistiki verilerin mekânsal değerlendirilmesini sağlaması ve sonuçlarının çabuk elde edilmesi, hesaplamadaki kolaylığı nedeniyle seçilmiştir. Bu çalışmada Yozgat’ın hangi ilçelerinde imalat sanayi kümelenmesinin görüldüğü, gelecekte imalat sanayine yapılacak yatırımların hangi ilçelere yapılabileceği ve 2013 yılında hazırlanan bölge planı önerileri ile yıllar içindeki imalat sanayi kümelenme eğiliminin uyumu araştırılmıştır. Sonuç olarak Yozgat’ta 2006 yılında çalışan sayılarına göre sadece Yerköy ve Sorgun İlçelerinde imalat sanayi kümelenmesi görülürken; 2011 yılında bu iki ilçe ile birlikte toplamda 6 ilçede daha imalat sanayi kümelenmesi olduğu görülmüş; 2016 yılına gelindiğinde Yerköy, Sorgun, Boğazlıyan ve Çayıralan ilçelerinde imalat sanayi kümelenmesi olduğu görülmüştür. Boğazlıyan ve Çayıralan ilçelerinin yayılma etkisi (widespread trickle-down effects) ile Kayseri kentine olan yakınlığın etkisinde olduğu bir başka önemli sonuçtur. İstatistiki Bölge Birimleri sınıflandırmasında üçüncü düzey yerleşmelerin de alt bölgeleri olan ilçeler düzeyinde yapılan bu çalışma Yozgat kenti için ilk ve öncü çalışmalardan birisidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGEN, B., OĞUZ, M. Ö. (2022). Periodic Manufacturing Industry Clustering Analysis in Yozgat Using the Location Quotient Method (2006-2016). PLANLAMA, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 116–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/588381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anderson, N.B., and Bogart, W., (2001). The Structure of Sprawl: Identifying and Characterizing Employment Centers in Polycentric Metropolitan Areas. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60(1), 147-169.
  2. Arısoy, I., (2008). Türkiye’de Sanayi Sektörü - Iktisadi Büyüme Ilişkisinin Kaldor Hipotezi Çerçevesinde Test Edilmesi, Discussion Paper, Turkish Economic Association, 1, 1-31.
  3. Campbell, J., (1974). A note on growth poles. Growth and Change, 5(2), 43-45.
  4. Chakravorty, S., (2003). Industrial location in post-reform India: patterns of inter-regional divergence and intra-regional convergence, The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 120-152.
  5. Chiang, S., (2009). Location Quotient and Trade. Ann. Reg. Sci., 43, 399-414.
  6. Crawley, A., Beynon, M., and Munday, M., (2013). Making Location Quotients More Relevant as a Policy Aid in Regional Spatial Analysis. Urban Studies, 50(9), 1854-1869.
  7. Cromley, R.G., and Hanink, D.M., (2012). Focal Location Quotients: Specification and Applications. Geographical Analysis, 44(4), 398-410.
  8. Dawkins, C.J., (2003). Regional Development Theory: Conceptual Foundations, Classic Works, and Recent Developments. Journal of Planning Literature., 18(2), 131-172.
  9. Dericioğlu, K.T., (1988). Az Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Kırsal Alanlara Yönelik Güncel Bölge Planlama Yaklaşımları [Current Regional Planning Approaches for Rural Areas of Developing Countries], METU Journal of Architecture, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11-22.
  10. Ergen, B., and Ergen, Z., (2016). Unifying Two Regional Planning Methodologies in an Analysis of the Rural and Agricultural Development Potential of the Province of Yozgat, Turkey Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 12(1), 51-64.
  11. Evangelinides, M., (1975). Regional development- core-periphery relations: the Greek case. The Greek Review of Social Research, 24, 320-255.
  12. Florence, P.S., (1939). Report on the Location of Industry. Political and Economic Planning, London, U.K. Fracasso, A., and Marzetti, G.V., (2017). Estimating dynamic localization economies: the inadvertent success of the specialization index and the location quotient. Regional Studies, 1-14.
  13. Gibson, J., Miller, M. and Wright, G. (1991). Location quotient: a basic tool for economic development analysis. Economic Development Review, 9(2), 65–68.
  14. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152. Guimarães, P., Figueiredo, O., and Woodward, D., (2009). Dartboard tests for the locatio