Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound and bladder fullness in the evaluation of cervical length in low-risk pregnant women

Düşük riskli gebelerde servikal uzunluğun değerlendirilmesinde transvajinal ve transabdominal ultrason ve mesane doluluğu incelemesi

Pages
165–172
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

TA ultrasound with a full bladder can be safely used for cervical length measurement in low-risk patients in every trimester.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Cervical length is an important ultrasonographic marker used to predict cervical insufficiency and preterm labor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study was planned as a prospective cross-sectional study and low-risk pregnant women between 11–37 weeks who presented to the hospital were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:TA ultrasound with a full bladder can be safely used for cervical length measurement in low-risk patients in every trimester.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Cervical length is an important ultrasonographic marker used to predict cervical insufficiency and preterm labor. Our aim in this study was to compare TA and TV cervical lengths in three trimesters and to investigate the effect of bladder fullness on TA measurements. Methods: This study was planned as a prospective cross-sectional study and low-risk pregnant women between 11–37 weeks who presented to the hospital were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups according to their trimesters, and the cervical lengths of the patients were assessed first with TA and then TV ultrasound with a full bladder and then an empty bladder. Results: The mean cervical length was 45.6±7.0 cm in firsttrimester patients, 42.8±7.0 cm in second-trimester patients, and 41.0±8.5 cm in third-trimester patients. Although TV cervical length was longer in all three trimesters, no statistically significant difference was found between TV and TA ultrasound with a full bladder (p>0.05). When TA ultrasound with empty bladder and TV ultrasound were compared, the TV measurements were found to be statistically significantly longer in each trimester (p0.05). Conclusion: TV and TA assessment with a full bladder were found similar in all three trimesters. TA ultrasound with a full bladder can be safely used for cervical length measurement in low-risk patients in every trimester.

Özet

Amaç: Servikal uzunluk, servikal yetersizli¤i ve preterm do¤umu öngörmede kullan›lan önemli bir ultrasonografi belirtecidir. Bu çal›flmadaki amac›m›z, transabdominal ve transvajinal servikal uzunluklar› üç trimesterde karfl›laflt›rmak ve mesane dolulu¤unun transabdominal ölçümler üzerindeki etkisini araflt›rmakt›. Yöntem: Bu çal›flma, prospektif kesitsel bir çal›flma olarak planland› ve hastaneye baflvuran ve gebeli¤in 11–37. haftalar› aras›nda olan düflük riskli gebeler çal›flmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar trimesterlerine göre üç gruba ayr›ld› ve hastalar›n servikal uzunluklar›, önce dolu ve ard›ndan bofl mesaneyle, önce transabdominal, ard›ndan transvajinal ultrason ile de¤erlendirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama servikal uzunluk birinci trimesterdeki hastalarda 45.6±7.0 cm, ikinci trimesterdeki hastalarda 42.8±7.0 cm ve üçüncü trimesterdeki hastalarda 41.0±8.5 cm olarak ölçüldü. Transvajinal servikal uzunluk üç trimesterde de en uzun olmas›na ra¤men, mesane doluyken transvajinal ve transabdominal ultrason aras›nda istatistiksel olarak anlaml› bir fark bulunmad› (p>0.05). Mesane boflken transabdominal ultrason ile transvajinal ultrason karfl›laflt›r›ld›¤›nda, transvajinal ölçümlerin her trimester istatistiksel olarak anlaml› flekilde daha uzun oldu¤u bulundu (p0.05). Sonuç: Mesane doluyken transabdominal ve transvajinal de¤erlendirme, üç trimesterde de benzer bulunmufltur. Mesane doluyken transabdominal ultrason, düflük riskli hastalarda her trimesterde servikal uzunlu¤u ölçümü için güvenle kullan›labilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİNTESUN, F. N. İ. (2022). Investigation of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound and bladder fullness in the evaluation of cervical length in low-risk pregnant women. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 165–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/588329

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Roh H-J, Ji YI, Jung CH, Jeon GH, Chun S, Cho HJ. Comparison of cervical lengths using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography in midpregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2013
  2. 1721–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Ar›soy R, Erdo¤du E, Tu¤rul S, Mirza T, F›nd›k F, Mihmanl› V, et al. The efficacy of the measurement of cervical length at 18–22 weeks of gestation for the prediction of preterm delivery in low risk asymptomatic pregnancies. Perinatal Journal 2013
  3. 66–71. [CrossRef] 3. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998
  4. 312–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. McIntosh J, Feltovich H, Berghella V, Manuck T
  5. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high-and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016
  6. B2–B7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length ≤15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000
  7. 1458–67. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Parry S, Simhan H, Elovitz M, Iams J. Universal maternal cervical length screening during the second trimester: pros and cons of a strategy to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012
  8. 101– 6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Khalifeh A, Berghella V. Universal cervical length screening in singleton gestations without a previous preterm birth: ten reasons why it should be implemented. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016
  9. e1–e5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. Westerway SC, Pedersen LH, Hyett J. Cervical length measurement: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approach. Australas J Ultrasound Med 2015
  10. 19–26. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Hernandez-Andrade E, Romero R, Ahn H, Hussein Y, Yeo L, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012
  11. 1682–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012
  12. 964–73. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrason