Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Discordant umbilical arteries in the umbilical cord entanglement: a light microscope study

Umbilikal kord dolanmasında uyumsuz umbilikal arterler: Işık mikroskobu çalışması

Pages
231–237
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When multiple cord entanglement is seen during obstetric examination, umbilical artery discordance must be remembered and investigated, and also maternal-fetal condition should be considered.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The present study aimed to examine the histopathologi- cal diagnosis of the umbilical artery discordance in cases with single or multiple umbilical cord entanglement and pregnancy outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The vascular structure of the umbilical cord, histopatholog- ical findings of the placenta and obstetric outcomes were retrospective- ly examined in 50 cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When multiple cord entanglement is seen during obstetric examination, umbilical artery discordance must be remembered and investigated, and also maternal-fetal condition should be considered.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to examine the histopathologi- cal diagnosis of the umbilical artery discordance in cases with single or multiple umbilical cord entanglement and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: The vascular structure of the umbilical cord, histopatholog- ical findings of the placenta and obstetric outcomes were retrospective- ly examined in 50 cases. The cases were divided into two groups by the number of cord entanglement (single-multiple) and their histopatho- logical findings and neonatal Apgar scores were assessed. Results: Out of 50 cases, 38 (76%) had single and 12 (24%) had mul- tiple cord entanglement. In 50 cases, the mean gestational age was 39.16±1.06 weeks, neonatal Apgar scores were 8.7±0.58 at 1 minute and 9.64±0.56 at 5 minute. No statistically significant difference was detected between single and multiple groups in terms of gestational age (p=0.79), 1-minute Apgar score (p=0.832) and 5-minute Apgar score (p=0.656). In histopathological examination, the diameters of umbilical arteries 1 and 2 were found to be 0.11±0.12, 0.09±0.05 μm, respectively in the single group (p=0.756) and 0.13±0.14, 0.06±0.02 μm, respectively in the multiple group (p=0.131). When the umbilical arterial diameters were compared by group, the diameter of the umbilical artery 2 was detected 0.09±0.05 μm in the single and 0.06±0.02 μm in the multiple group and statistically significant differ- ence was detected (p=0.037). Out of 50 cases, placental hypoxia find- ing was detected as chorangiosis only in 10 cases (2 multiple, 8 single). Conclusion: Umbilical artery discordance was detected in cases with multiple umbilical cord entanglement. However, poor preg- nancy outcome was not observed in any of the cases. When multiple cord entanglement is seen during obstetric examination, umbilical artery discordance must be remembered and investigated, and also maternal-fetal condition should be considered.

Özet

Amaç: Çal›flmam›zda tek veya çoklu umbilikal kord dolanmas› olan olgularda umbilikal arter uyumsuzlu¤una yönelik histopatolojik ta- n›y› ve gebelik sonuçlar›n› incelemeyi amaçlad›k. Yöntem: Umbilikal kordun vasküler yap›s›, plasentan›n histopato- lojik bulgular› ve obstetrik sonuçlar 50 olguda retrospektif olarak incelendi. Olgular kordon dolanmas› say›s›na (tek-çoklu) göre iki gruba ayr›ld› ve olgular›n histopatolojik bulgular› ve neonatal Ap- gar skorlar› de¤erlendirildi. Bulgular: Elli olgunun 38’inde (%76) tek ve 12’sinde (%24) çoklu kordon dolanmas› mevcuttu. 50 olgunun ortalama gestasyonel yafl› 39.16±1.06 ve neonatal Apgar skorlar› 1. dakika için 8.7±0.58, 5. da- kika için 9.64±0.56 idi. Gestasyonel yafl (p=0.79), 1. dakika Apgar skoru (p=0.832) ve 5. dakika Apgar skoru (p=0.656) bak›m›ndan tek- li ve çoklu kordon dolanmas› gruplar›nda istatistiksel olarak anlaml› fark yoktu. Histopatolojik muayenede 1. ve 2. umbilikal arterlerin ça- p› tek kordon dolanmas› grubunda s›ras›yla 0.11±0.12, 0.09±0.05 μm (p=0.756) ve çoklu kordon dolanmas› grubunda ise s›ras›yla 0.13±0.14, 0.06±0.02 μm (p=0.131) olarak bulundu. Umbilikal arter- yal çaplar gruba göre karfl›laflt›r›ld›¤›nda, umbilikal arter 2’nin çap› tek kordon dolanmas› grubunda 0.09±0.05 μm ve çoklu kordon do- lanmas› grubunda 0.06±0.02 μm olarak bulundu ve istatistiksel olarak anlaml› fark vard› (p=0.037). Elli olgunun 10’unda (2 çoklu, 8 tek) plasental hipoksi bulgusu sadece koranjiozis olarak tespit edildi. Sonuç: Çoklu umbilikal kord dolanmas› olan olgularda umbilikal arter uyumsuzlu¤u tespit ettik, fakat olgular›n herhangi birinde kötü gebelik sonucu gözlemlemedik. Obstetrik muayenede çoklu kordon dolanmas› görülmesi halinde, umbilikal arter uyumsuzlu- ¤u hat›rlanarak araflt›r›lmal› ve ayr›ca maternal-fetal durum dikka- te al›nmal›d›r.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENYUVA, İ., KÜÇÜK, Ş. (2022). Discordant umbilical arteries in the umbilical cord entanglement: a light microscope study. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 231–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/588327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ferguson VL, Dodson RB. Bioengineering aspects of the umbilical cord. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009
  2. 144(Suppl 1):S108–13. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Persutte WH, Hobbins J. Single umbilical artery: a clinical enigma in modern prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995
  3. 216–29. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 3. Dolkart LA, Reimers FT, Kuonen CA. Discordant umbilical arteries: ultrasonographic and Doppler analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1992
  4. 59–63. [PubMed] 4. fienyuva ‹, Küçük fi. A partial supernumerary umbilical vessels. J Clin Obstet Gynecol 2020
  5. 78–81. [CrossRef] 5. Dodds M, Windrim R, Kingdom J. Complex umbilical cord entanglement. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012
  6. 1827–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Nkwabong E, Ndoumbe Mballo J, Dohbit JS. Risk factors for nuchal cord entanglement at delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018
  7. 108–12. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Akkaya H, Büke B, Pekcan MK, fiahin K, Uysal G, Ye¤in GF, et al. Nuchal cord: is it really the silent risk of pregnancy? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017
  8. 1730–3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. Redline RW. Clinical and pathological umbilical cord abnor- malities in fetal thrombotic vasculopathy. Hum Pathol 2004
  9. 1494–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Pergialiotis V, Fanaki M, Bellos I, Tzortzis A, Loutradis D, Daskalakis G. Evaluation of umbilical cord entanglement as a predictive factor of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta- analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019
  10. 150–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Predanic M, Perni SC. Antenatal assessment of discordant umbilical arteries in singleton pregnancies. Croat Med J 2006
  11. 701–8. [PubMed] 11. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Saile G, Brühwiler H. The clinical significance of antenatal detection of discordant umbilical arteries. Obstet Gynecol 1998
  12. 86–91. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Petrikovsky B, Schneider E. Prenatal diagnosis and clinical sig- nificance of hypoplastic umbilical artery. Prenat Diagn 1996
  13. 938–40. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 13. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Brühwiler H. Prenatal assessment of the Hyrtl anastomosis and evaluation of its function: case report. Hum Reprod 1999
  14. 1890–3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 14. Sepulveda W, Flack NJ, Bower S, Fisk NM. The value of color Doppler ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of hypoplastic umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994
  15. 143–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 15. Malas MA, Sulak O, Gökçimen A, Sari A. Morphology of umbilical vessels in human fetuses: a quantitative light micro- scope st