Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

The relationship between umbilical cord measurements and newborn outcomes

Umbilikal kord ve yenidoğan sonuçları arasındaki ilişki

Pages
225–23
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study found no relationship between umbilical vein diameter and cord length and fetal weight and pregnancy outcome in low-risk 38.0–41.6-week pregnancies (AGA fetuses).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study investigated the relationship between umbil- ical vein diameter and cord length and fetal outcome in low-risk pregnancies (fetuses appropriate for gestational age [AGA]).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A prospective cohort study of 39 singleton pregnant women aged 19–44 years at between 38+0 and 41+6 weeks of gesta- tion was conducted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, this study found no relationship between umbilical vein diameter and cord length and fetal weight and pregnancy outcome in low-risk 38.0–41.6-week pregnancies (AGA fetuses).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the relationship between umbil- ical vein diameter and cord length and fetal outcome in low-risk pregnancies (fetuses appropriate for gestational age [AGA]). Methods: A prospective cohort study of 39 singleton pregnant women aged 19–44 years at between 38+0 and 41+6 weeks of gesta- tion was conducted. Case demographics, umbilical vein diameter measured by prenatal ultrasound, postnatal birth weight, gender, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, blood gas analysis, and umbilical cord length were recorded. Fetuses with a fetal weight in the 10–90th per- centile according to week of gestation were accepted as AGA. Results: The mean age of the pregnant women was 27.5±5.3 years. 33% (13/39) of the pregnant women were nulliparous. There was no statistically significant correlation between umbilical vein diameter and other variables in correlation analysis (p>0.050). Umbilical cord length and umbilical vein lactate level were found to have a statistical- ly negative and significant correlation (r=-0.418; p=0.015); however, no other pregnancy outcomes were found to have a significant corre- lation. There was no statistically significant difference between the median values of umbilical vein diameter and cord length by gender (p=0.076 and 0.181, respectively). Conclusion: In conclusion, this study found no relationship between umbilical vein diameter and cord length and fetal weight and pregnancy outcome in low-risk 38.0–41.6-week pregnancies (AGA fetuses). However, the obtained results still need to be con- firmed by larger series.

Özet

Amaç: Çal›flmam›zda, düflük riskli gebeliklerde (gestasyonel yafla gö- re normal fetüsler [AGA]) umbilikal ven çap› ile kordon uzunlu¤u ve fetal sonuç aras›ndaki iliflkiyi araflt›rd›k. Yöntem: Gebeli¤in 38+0 ve 41+6. haftalar› aras›nda 19–44 yafl›n- daki 39 tekil gebelikten oluflan prospektif bir kohort çal›flmas› ger- çeklefltirildi. Olgular›n demografik özellikleri, prenatal ultrason ile ölçülen umbilikal ven çap›, postnatal do¤um a¤›rl›¤›, cinsiyet, 1. ve 5. dakika Apgar skorlar›, kan gaz› analizi ve umbilikal kord uzun- lu¤u kaydedildi. Gestasyonel haftaya göre 10–90. persantilde olan fetal a¤›rl›kl› fetüsler AGA kabul edildi. Bulgular: Gebelerin ortalama yafl› 27.5±5.3 idi. Gebelerin %33’ü (13/39) nullipard›. Korelasyon analizinde umbilikal ven çap› ve di- ¤er de¤iflkenler aras›nda istatistiksel olarak anlaml› korelasyon yoktu (p>0.050). Umbilikal kord uzunlu¤u ve umbilikal ven laktat seviyesinin istatistiksel olarak negatif ve anlaml› korelasyona sahip oldu¤u bulundu (r=-0.418; p=0.015); ancak di¤er gebelik sonuçla- r›nda anlaml› korelasyon yoktu. Cinsiyete göre umbilikal ven çap› ve kordon uzunlu¤unun medyan de¤erleri aras›nda istatistiksel olarak anlaml› fark yoktu (s›ras›yla p=0.076 ve 0.181). Sonuç: Sonuç olarak çal›flmam›zda, 38.0–41.6 haftal›k gebelikler- de (AGA fetüslerde) umbilikal ven çap› ve kordon uzunlu¤u ile fe- tal a¤›rl›k ve gebelik sonucu aras›nda bir iliflki bulamad›k. Ancak elde edilen sonuçlar›n yine de daha büyük seriler ile do¤rulanma- s› gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BIYIK, İ., SOYSAL, C., KESKİN, N., ERTEN, Ö., ŞİŞMAN, H. İ., DELİLOĞLU, B., SOYSAL, D. G. (2022). The relationship between umbilical cord measurements and newborn outcomes. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 225–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/588314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Howell KR, Powell TL. Effects of maternal obesity on placen- tal function and fetal development. Reproduction 2017
  2. R97–R108. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Wright C, Sibley CP. Placental transfer in health and disease. In Kay H, Nelson M, Yuping W, editors. The placenta: from development to disease. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  3. p. 66–74. 3. Perazzolo S, Hirschmugl B, Wadsack C, Desoye G, Lewis RM, Sengers BG. The influence of placental metabolism on fatty acid transfer to the fetus. J Lipid Res 2017
  4. 443–54. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. Boito S, Struijk PC, Ursem NTC, Stijnen T, Wladimiroff JW. Umbilical venous volume flow in the normally developing and growth-restricted human fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002
  5. 344–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Reiss I, Weiner CP, Harman CR. Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perina- tal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000
  6. 407–13. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Köflüfl A, Köflüfl N, Turhan NÖ. Is there any relation between umbilical artery and vein diameter and estimated fetal weight in healthy pregnant women? J Med Ultrason (2001) 2012
  7. 227–34. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Günter Duwe D, Cromi A, Karousou E, Dürig P. Sonographic umbilical vessel morphometry and peri- natal outcome of fetuses with a lean umbilical cord. J Clin Ultrasound 2005
  8. 18–23. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Maymon, E, Mueller MD, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a lean umbilical cord: a simple marker for the fetus at risk of being small for gestational age at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999
  9. 176–80. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Barbieri C, Cecatti JG, Krupa F, Marussi EF, Costa JV. Validation study of the capacity of the reference curves of ultra- sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord to identify deviations in estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008
  10. 286–91. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Balkawade NU, Shinde MA. Study of length of umbilical cord and fetal outcome: a study of 1,000 deliveries. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2012
  11. 520–5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Krakowiak P, Smith EN, de Bruyn G, Lydon-Rochelle MT. Risk factors and outcomes associated with a short umbilical cord. Obstet Gynecol 2004
  12. 119–27. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Spellacy WN, Gravem H, Fisch RO. The umbilical cord com- plications of true knots, nuchal coils and cords around the body. Report from the collaborative study of cerebral palsy. Am J