Journals / Perinatal journal (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Fetal thymus reference range in healthy singleton pregnancies

Pages
66–74
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of linear regression analysis between thymus measurements and BPD; the equations for the optimal models are as follows: thymus transverse diameter= -3.49+0.4×BPD (mm) (r=0.826, R2 =0.682, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To present the reference range of the fetal thymus gland according to gestational age groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this prospective study, fetal thymus size was assessed in singleton, uncomplicated pregnancies between 19 and 38 weeks of gestation in our outpatient clinic between 2019 and 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of linear regression analysis between thymus measurements and BPD; the equations for the optimal models are as follows: thymus transverse diameter= -3.49+0.4×BPD (mm) (r=0.826, R2 =0.682, p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To present the reference range of the fetal thymus gland according to gestational age groups. Methods: In this prospective study, fetal thymus size was assessed in singleton, uncomplicated pregnancies between 19 and 38 weeks of gestation in our outpatient clinic between 2019 and 2020. Based on their monthly pregnancy follow-ups, fetal thymus measurement was divided into 5 gestational age groups (Group 1: 19–22 weeks, Group 2: 23–26 weeks, Group 3: 27–30 weeks, Group 4: 31–34 weeks, and Group 5: 35–38 weeks). Results: Fetal thymus measurements of 210 patients were performed over one year, and as a result, 184 pregnant patients were included for assessment. Fetal thymus could be visualized at a rate of 93.5%. The 5th percentile of thymus transverse diameter, antero-posterior diameter, perimeter, thymus anterior-posterior diameter to thoracic diameter, and thymus perimeter to thoracic circumference were 11.03 mm, 5.60 mm, 32.52 mm, 0.33, and 0.32 in Group 1; 13.53 mm, 7.66 mm, 43.67 mm, 0.34, and 0.32 in Group 2; 20.43 mm, 11.22 mm, 47.72 mm, 0.33, and 0.32 in Group 3; 27 mm, 12.98 mm, 55.88 mm, 0.32, and 0.30 in Group 4; 28 mm, 13.59 mm, 63.4 mm, 0.32, and 0.30 in Group 5; respectively. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficients for the thymic measurements were 0.879, 0.869, 0.846, 0.236, and 0.267 respectively, and all p-values were less than 0.001. As a result of linear regression analysis between thymus measurements and BPD; the equations for the optimal models are as follows: thymus transverse diameter= -3.49+0.4×BPD (mm) (r=0.826, R2 =0.682, p

🔖

Cite This Article

KALAYCI, H., DURDAĞ, G. D., BARAN, Ş. Y., ALEMDAROĞLU, S., YAĞINÇ, D. A., ÇOK, T., AYDIN, Ş. (2022). Fetal thymus reference range in healthy singleton pregnancies. Perinatal journal (Online), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 66–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/588287

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cho JY, Min JY, Lee YH, McCrindle B, Hornberger LK, Yoo SJ. Diameter of the normal fetal thymus on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007
  2. 634–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Gamez F, De Leon-Luis J, Pintado P, Perez R, Robinson JN, Antolin E, et al. Fetal thymus size in uncomplicated twin and singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010
  3. 302–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 3. Chaoui R, Kalache KD, Heling KS, Tennstedt C, Bommer C, Körner H. Absent or hypoplastic thymus on ultrasound: a marker for deletion 22q11.2 in fetal cardiac defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002
  4. 546–52. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. Thomas JA, Graham JM. Chromosome 22q1l deletion syndrome: an update and review for the primary pediatrician. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2016
  5. 253–66. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Zalel Y, Gamzu R, Mashiach S, Achiron R. The development of the fetal thymus: an in utero sonographic evaluation. Prenat Diagn 2002
  6. 114–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Aksakal SE, Kandemir O, Alt›nbas S, Esin S, Müftüoglu KH. Fetal tyhmus size as a predictor of histological chorioamnionitis in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013
  7. 1118–22. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Ghalandarpoor-Attar SN, Borna S, Ghalandarpoor-Attar SM, Hantoushzadeh S, Khezerdoost S, Ghotbizadeh F. Measuring fetal thymus size: a new method for diabetes screening in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018
  8. 1157– 61. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. Muñoz-Chápuli M, Gámez F, Bravo C, Ortiz L, Pérez R, De León-Luis JA. The thy-box for sonographic assessment of the fetal thymus. J Ultrasound Med 2015
  9. 853–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Tangshewinsirikul C, Panburana P. Sonographic measurement of fetal thymus size in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies. J Clin Ultrasound 2017
  10. 150–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Yagel S, Arbel R, Anteby EY, Raveh D, Achiron R. The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002
  11. 340–5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Gill J, Malin M, Sutherland J, Gray D, Hollander G, Boyd R. Thymic generation and regeneration. Immunol Rev 2003
  12. 28–50. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Nau TG, de Murcia KO, Möllers M, Braun J, Abhari RE, Steinhard J, et al. Foetal thymus size in pregnancies after assisted reproductive technologies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018
  13. 329–36. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 13. Ekin A, Gezer C, Taner CE, Solmaz U, Gezer NS, Ozeren M. Prognostic value of fetal thymus size in intrauterine growth restriction. J Ultrasound Med 2016