Journals / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Evaluating the effect of differentiated inquiry-based science lesson modules on gifted students' scientific process skills

Farklılaştırılmış sorgulamaya dayalı fen dersi modüllerinin üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
1289–1324
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of data analysis, we found that SPS improved significantly (t (14) = -5.06, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of “Global citizenship”, which has become more and more important, based on the students' multi-focused individual development, has brought to the fore based on 21st century skills and has required appropriate educational environments for gifted students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a method, the nature of the study was directed us to mixed nested patterns and developed three modules that applied to 16 gifted students in Science and Art Centers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of data analysis, we found that SPS improved significantly (t (14) = -5.06, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The concept of “Global citizenship”, which has become more and more important, based on the students' multi-focused individual development, has brought to the fore based on 21st century skills and has required appropriate educational environments for gifted students. In this context, the development of differentiated inquiry-based science lesson modules for gifted students will fill the current gap as it is important for the literature. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of differentiated inquiry-based science lesson modules for gifted students on the students' scientific process skills (SPS). As a method, the nature of the study was directed us to mixed nested patterns and developed three modules that applied to 16 gifted students in Science and Art Centers. In the evaluation process, we used “Diet Cola SPS test” as quantitative data source for pre and posttests. Also, we used observations in the implementation process and SPS activity reports filled out by students as qualitative data sources. As a result of data analysis, we found that SPS improved significantly (t (14) = -5.06, p

Özet

Öğrencilerin çok odaklı bireysel gelişimine dayalı olarak giderek daha da önem kazanan “küresel vatandaşlık” kavramı, 21. yüzyıl becerilerine dayalı bireysel gelişimi ön plana çıkarmış ve uygun eğitim ortamları gerektirmiştir. Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler için, hem araştırmacılar hem de uygulayıcılar tarafından sıklıkla dile getirilen bu tür eğitim ortamları bir gereklilik haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üstün yetenekli öğrenciler için farklılaştırılmış sorgulamaya dayalı fen dersi modüllerinin öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerileri (SPS) üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçla araştırma 2018-2019 eğitim-öğretim yılının ilk yarıyılında yapılmıştır. Yöntem olarak, çalışma doğası gereği araştırmacıları iç içe karma desene yönlendirmiştir. Öğretmenlerin çalıştıkları Bilim ve Sanat Merkezlerinde 16 üstün yetenekli öğrenciye uygulanan üç modül geliştirilmiştir. Değerlendirme sürecinde ön ve son test için nicel veri kaynağı olarak “Diet Cola SPS Testi” kullandılmıştır. Ayrıca, uygulama sürecindeki gözlemleri ve öğrenciler tarafından doldurulan SPS etkinlik raporlarını nitel veri kaynağı olarak kullanılmıştır. Veri analizi sonucunda bilimsel süreç becerilerinin önemli ölçüde geliştiği bulunmuştur (t (14) = -5.06, p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEPNİ, S., ÜLGER, B. B. (2022). Evaluating the effect of differentiated inquiry-based science lesson modules on gifted students' scientific process skills. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 1289–1324. https://ajindex.com/articles/587942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abdurrahman, A., Ariyani, F., Maulina, H., & Nurulsari, N. (2019). Design and validation of inquiry-based stem learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to facilitate gifted students facing 21st century challenging. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7 (1), 33-56.
  2. Adams, C. M. & Callahan, C. M. (1995). The reliability and validity of a performance task for evaluating science process skills. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39 (1), 14 – 20. Akçam Yalçın, İ. (2017). The bridge between science curriculum and inquiry based science education: the training of pre-service classroom teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Hacettepe University Mathematics and Science Education Department, Ankara.
  3. Andriyani, R., Shimizu, K., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2019). The effectiveness of project-based learning on students’ science process skills: a literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321 (3), 032121. Altıntaş, E. & Özdemir, A. S. (2015). The effect of differentiation approach developed on creativity of gifted students: Cognitive and affective factors. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(8), 1191-1201.
  4. Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487-509.
  5. Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38 (1), 17-29.
  6. Biological Science Curriculum Study (2006). Why does inquiry matter? Because that’s what science is all about! USA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. Bostan-Sarıoğlan, A., Can, Y. & Gedik, İ. (2016). The assessment of the suitability of the activities in 6th grade science course books for inquiry based learning approach. Journal of Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Edcation, 16 (3), 1004-1025.
  7. Büyüköztürk, S. (2009). Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation. (10. Ed.) Ankara:
  8. Pegem. Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L.B. Flick & N.G. Lederman (Eds), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. (pp.1-14). Dordrecht: Springer. Callahan, C. M. (2017). The characteristics of gifted and talented students. In C.M. Callahan & H.L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.) Fundamentals of Gifted Education (pp. 153-166). New York: Routledge. Callahan, C M, Hunsaker, S