SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAND ENGAGEMENT AND BRAND EXPERIENCE: THE MODERATING ROLES OF SOCIAL INFLUENCE AND BRAND TRUST

MARKA ETKİLEŞİMİ VE MARKA DENEYİMİ İLİŞKİSİNDE SOSYAL ETKİ VE MARKA GÜVENİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Merve VARDARSUYU
Pages
427–450
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study provides theoretical and practical implications and ends with fruitful future study directions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the era of fierce competition and high market dynamism, creating superior brand experience has been one of the key objectives of companies, which in turn fostered the importance and number of experience studies in the marketing literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A conceptual framework is tested using structural equation modeling with survey responses from 215 Turkish consumers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study provides theoretical and practical implications and ends with fruitful future study directions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marka etkileşimi · marka deneyimi · sosyal etki

Abstract

In the era of fierce competition and high market dynamism, creating superior brand experience has been one of the key objectives of companies, which in turn fostered the importance and number of experience studies in the marketing literature. Drawing from extant brand experience literature, this study aims to investigate the boundary roles of social influence and brand trust in the relationship between brand engagement and brand experience. A conceptual framework is tested using structural equation modeling with survey responses from 215 Turkish consumers. The data analysis results reveal that brand engagement is positively related to brand experience and this positive relationship is stronger in the case of higher social influence. Contrary to expectations, brand trust negatively moderates the brand engagement – brand experience link. Further, brand experience increases consumers’ willingness to pay. The study provides theoretical and practical implications and ends with fruitful future study directions.

Özet

Tüketici pazarlarındaki yoğun rekabet ve yüksek dinamizmin etkisiyle, güçlü marka deneyimi yaratmak işletmelerin temel amaçlarından biri haline gelmiş ve pazarlama literatüründe deneyimi anlamaya ve açıklamaya yönelik çalışmaların önemini ve sayısını artırmıştır. Mevcut marka deneyimi literatüründen yola çıkan bu araştırmada, marka etkileşiminin marka deneyimi üzerindeki etkisinde sosyal etki ve marka güveninin düzenleyici rolü incelenmektedir. Araştırmada öne sürülen kavramsal model 215 Türk tüketiciden toplanan anket verisi ile yapısal eşitlik modeli üzerinden test edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları marka etkileşiminin marka deneyimini olumlu yönde etkilediğini ve bu etkinin yüksek sosyal etki durumunda daha güçlü olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ancak, beklenenin aksine, marka güveni marka etkileşimi – marka deneyimi ilişkisini zayıflatmaktadır. Bunların yanında, marka deneyimi tüketicilerin daha çok harcama isteğini artırmaktadır. Teoriye ve yöneticilere öneriler sunan çalışma, gelecek araştırmalar için yararlı önerilerle sonlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

VARDARSUYU, M. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRAND ENGAGEMENT AND BRAND EXPERIENCE: THE MODERATING ROLES OF SOCIAL INFLUENCE AND BRAND TRUST. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 427–450. https://ajindex.com/articles/587880

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aaker, D. A., (1996).
  2. Building Strong Brands, Free Press.
  3. New York. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. Becerra, E. P., & Badrinarayanan, V. (2013). The influence of brand trust and brand identification on brand evangelism. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(5/6), 371-383.
  4. Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020). Customer experience: Fundamental premises and implications for research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 630-648.
  5. Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty?. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 52-68.
  6. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  7. Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Jurić, B., & Ilić, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252-271.
  8. Cameron, Trudy A. and Michelle D. James (1987). Estimating Willingness to Pay from Survey Data: An Alternative Pre-Test- Market Evaluation Procedure. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 389-395.
  9. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
  10. Coelho, F. J., Bairrada, C. M., & de Matos Coelho, A. F. (2020). Functional brand qualities and perceived value: The mediating role of brand experience and brand personality. Psychology & Marketing, 37(1), 41-5.
  11. Cohen, J., & Golden, E. (1972). Informational social influence and product evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 54–59.
  12. Das, G., Agarwal, J., Malhotra, N. K., & Varshneya, G. (2019). Does brand experience translate into brand commitment?: A mediated-moderation model of brand passion and perceived brand ethicality. Journal of Business Research, 95(2019), 479-490.
  13. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.
  14. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley. Ding, C. G., & Tseng, T. H. (2015). On the relationships amon