SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 37

EVALUATION OF SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE USING AN INTEGRATED TWO-STEP CLUSTERING AND INTERVAL TYPE-2 FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD: A CASE STUDY

TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ PERFORMANSININ ENTEGRE İKİ AŞAMALI KÜMELEME VE ARALIK TİP-2 BULANIK TOPSİS YÖNTEMİ KULLANARAK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: BİR VAKA ÇALIŞMASI

Mehmet ERDEM
Turan Erman ERKAN
Pages
141–160
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, valuable insight is provided that each company can have theopportunity to evaluate itself both against the rivals within clusters and inter-sectoral rivals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Supply chain management (SCM) is an important subject for many researchers and organizations striving to improveperformance within different contexts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Various metrics and decision making methodologies have been proposed to evaluatesupply chain (SC) performance in different sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, valuable insight is provided that each company can have theopportunity to evaluate itself both against the rivals within clusters and inter-sectoral rivals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Supply chain management (SCM) is an important subject for many researchers and organizations striving to improveperformance within different contexts. Various metrics and decision making methodologies have been proposed to evaluatesupply chain (SC) performance in different sectors. This paper introduces an integration of the Two-Step Clustering and theinterval type-2 (IT2) Fuzzy TOPSIS methods for the SC performance evaluation process. In the first step of the proposedintegrated approach, Two-Step Clustering analysis (CA) is employed not only to classify the sectors, i.e., manufacturingand service, but also to decrease the dimension of the problem. After obtaining the results, IT2 Fuzzy TOPSIS is used toevaluate each company within its cluster. The results of the integrated approach offer a macro perspective on some issues,such as organizational efficiency and performance. Moreover, valuable insight is provided that each company can have theopportunity to evaluate itself both against the rivals within clusters and inter-sectoral rivals.

Özet

Tedarik zinciri (TZ) yönetiminde birçok araştırmacı ve kuruluş sistemin performansını iyileştirmek için farklı perspektiflerde çaba sarfetmektedir. Farklı sektörlerde TZ performansını değerlendirmek için çeşitli metrikler ve karar verme metodolojileri önerilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, TZ performans değerlendirme süreçleri için bütünleşik iki aşamalı kümeleme ve aralık tip-2 bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi önerilmektedir. Önerilen bu yaklaşımın ilk adımında, iki aşamalı kümeleme analizi ile sektörlerin homojen olarak bölümlendirilmesi ve aynı zamanda problemin boyutunun azaltılması sağlanmaktadır. İkinci adımda, bulanık TOPSIS ile oluşturulan kümeler değerlendirilmektedir. Yaklaşımın sonuçları, örgütsel etkinlik ve şirket performansı gibi konularda makro bakış açısı sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca sonuçlar, her şirketin bulunduğu kümelerdeki rakipleri arasında ve diğer sektörlerdeki rakiplere karşı kendini değerlendirme fırsatı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, M., ERKAN, T. E. (2022). EVALUATION OF SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE USING AN INTEGRATED TWO-STEP CLUSTERING AND INTERVAL TYPE-2 FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD: A CASE STUDY. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 37, 141–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/587583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahi, P., and Searcy, C. (2015). “Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: A triple bottom line approach”. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(10), 2882-2896.
  2. Akman, G. (2015). “Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 86, 69-82.
  3. Akyuz, G. A., and Erkan, T. E. (2010). “Supply chain performance measurement: a literature review”. International Journal of Production Research, 48(17), 5137-5155.
  4. Bai, C. G., Dhavale, D., and Sarkis, J. (2014). “Integrating Fuzzy C-Means and TOPSIS for performance evaluation: An application and comparative analysis”. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(9), 4186-4196.
  5. Bernardes, E. S., and Zsidisin, G. A. (2008). “An examination of strategic supply management benefits and performance implications”. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(4), 209-219.
  6. Boley, D., Gini, M., Gross, R., Han, E.-H. S., Hastings, K., Karypis, G., Kumar, V., Mobasher, B., and Moore, J. (1999). “Partitioning-Based Clustering for Web Document Categorization “. Decision Support Systems, 27, 329-341.
  7. Boran, F. E., Genc, S., Kurt, M., and Akay, D. (2009). “A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method”. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.
  8. Bottani, E., and Rizzi, A. (2008). “An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection - An application oriented to lead-time reduction”. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 763- 781. Buyukozkan, G., and Cifci, G. (2012). “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers”. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.
  9. Celik, E., and Akyuz, E. (2018). “An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: The case of ship loader”. Ocean Engineering, 155, 371-381.
  10. Chan, F. T. S. (2003). “Performance Measurement in a Supply Chain”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(7), 534-548.
  11. Che, Z. H., and Wang, H. S. (2010). “A hybrid approach for supplier cluster analysis”. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 59(2), 745-763.
  12. Chen, C. T. (2000). “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1-9.
  13. Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., and Huang, S. F. (2006). “A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation a