SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Nadir bir olgu: Uterin müllerian adenosarkamunun difüzyon mrı bulguları

A rare case: Difusion mri findings of uterine mullerian adenosarcoma

Gülnur ERDEM
Özlem Tuğçe KALAYCI
Emine Türkmen ŞAMDANCI
Fitnet SÖNMEZGÖZ
Sadegül SAYIN
Pages
156–158
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case report, it was aimed to present pelvic MRI and diffusion MRI fndings of a patient with rare uterussarcoma in correlation with histopathological fndings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Uterine sarcomas are quite rare of all uterus tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 42 year-old female patient consulted at the hospital complain-ing about stain-like bleeding for four months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case report, it was aimed to present pelvic MRI and diffusion MRI fndings of a patient with rare uterussarcoma in correlation with histopathological fndings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Uterine sarcomas are quite rare of all uterus tumors. A 42 year-old female patient consulted at the hospital complain-ing about stain-like bleeding for four months. The patient was given a pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anddiffusion MRI examination. Her endoservical biopsy material histopathologically was revealed mullerian adenosar-coma. In this case report, it was aimed to present pelvic MRI and diffusion MRI fndings of a patient with rare uterussarcoma in correlation with histopathological fndings.

Özet

Uterin sarkomlar oldukça nadir görülen neoplazmlardır. 42 yaşında lekelenme tarzında kanama şikayeti olan kadınhastanın jinekolojik muayenesinde endoservikal kanala protrüde olan kitle saptandı. Olgu, pelvik bölgeye yönelikmanyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ve difüzyon ağırlıklı MRG (DAMRG) inceleme ile değerlendirildi. Histo- patolojik inceleme sonucu; müllerian adenosarkom olarak rapor edildi. Bu makalede patolojik olarak müllerian ade- nosarkom tanısı almış olgunun MRG ve DAMRG bulguları değerlendirilip literatür eşliğinde sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, G., KALAYCI, Ö. T., ŞAMDANCI, E. T., SÖNMEZGÖZ, F., SAYIN, S. (2022). Nadir bir olgu: Uterin müllerian adenosarkamunun difüzyon mrı bulguları. Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 156–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/586009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bal A, Mohan H, Aulakh R, Huria A. Endometrial stromal lesions: a morphological and immunohistochemical study of short series. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 277:21-24
  2. Siegelman ES. Kadın Pelvis MR Görüntüleme. Olgun DÇ, editor. Body MRI. 1.baskı İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık, 2008. p.282-3
  3. Koyama T, Tamai K, Togashi K. Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:2009-19
  4. Karaer A, Demirel Ç, Gunes N, Kose S. Papiller adenofbroma of the cervix: a case report. Gynecol Surg 2008; 5:307-8
  5. Kerimoğlu Ü, Akata D, Hazırolan T, Ergen F, Köse F, Özyar E et all. Evaluation of radiotherapy response of cervical carcinoma with gray scale and color Doppler ultrasonography: resistive index correlation with magnetic resonance fndings. Diagn Interv Radiol 2006; 12:155-60
  6. Engin G. Pelvik Kitlelerde Radyolojik Yaklaşım. Turkiye Klinikleri J Radiol-Special Topics 2010; 3(2):52-65
  7. Okamoto Y, Tanaka Y, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y. MR Imaging of the Uterine Cervix: Imaging-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2003; 23:425-45
  8. Kılıçkesmez Ö, Yirik G, Bayramoğlu S, Cimilli T, Aydın S. Non- breath-hold high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging technique: apparent diffusion coeffcient determination in normal abdo - minal organs. Diagn Interv Radiol 2008; 14:83-7
  9. McVeigh P, Syed A, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider M. Diffusion- weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1058-64.