Journals / Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Which is More Dependable for Mother And Baby: Elective or Emergent Cesarean?

Anne ve Bebek İçin Hangisi Daha Güvenilir: Elektif Sezeryan mı? Acil Sezeryan mı?

Pages
194–197
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: There was no significant difference between the groups that operated in emergent or elective conditions.Mean age were 28.3+/-5 and 28.8+/-5 years (p:0.524 ), gestational weeks were 38.4+/- 1 and 39 +/- 6 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Timing for elective cesaren is not clear yet.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Two hundred and thirty seven (237) women, who applied to Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Educationand Research Hospital for delivery, were included within the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: There was no significant difference between the groups that operated in emergent or elective conditions.Mean age were 28.3+/-5 and 28.8+/-5 years (p:0.524 ), gestational weeks were 38.4+/- 1 and 39 +/- 6 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Timing for elective cesaren is not clear yet. Furthermore, the confidence of elective or emergent ce- sarean section is unclear for mother and baby. We want to study the maternal and neonatal affects of cesarean sectionaccording to the conditions: Elective or Emergency? Material and Methods: Two hundred and thirty seven (237) women, who applied to Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Educationand Research Hospital for delivery, were included within the study. We had two groups: 111 of these women had ce- saeran section in emergent conditions whereas 126 women operated at the 39. gestational week in elective conditions.After the approval of patients, the demographic data, obstetric history, pre-and post partum hemoglobin ,vital sign,intra-and postoperative complications, APGAR score of neonate and necessarity of intensive care unit were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups that operated in emergent or elective conditions.Mean age were 28.3+/-5 and 28.8+/-5 years (p:0.524 ), gestational weeks were 38.4+/- 1 and 39 +/- 6 (p

Özet

Amaç: Elektif ve acil koşullarda yapılan sezeryan ile doğumların anne ve bebek üzerine olan etkilerini incelemekamaçlanmıştır. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesine doğum için başvuran 237 hasta çalış- maya dâhil edilmiştir. Hastalardan 111 tanesinin acil koşullarda sezeryan ile doğumu gerçekleştirilirken 126 hastaya39. gebelik haftasında elektif şartlarda sezeryan uygulanmıştır. Hastaların onamının alınmasını takiben demografik,obstetrik öyküleri kaydedilerek doğum öncesi ve sonrası hemogram değerleri, vital bulguları ile intraoperatif ve pos- toperatif komplikasyonlar ve bebek APGARları ile yenidoğan yoğun bakım ihtiyaçları değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: Demografik özelliklerine göre sırasıyla acil ve elektif sezeryan grupları değerlendirildiğinde yaş ortalama- ları 28,3+/-5 ve 28,8+/-5 ( p:0,524), gebelik haftaları 38,4+/- 1 ve 39 +/- 6 (p< 0,01) şeklinde idi. Gruplar preoperatifve postoperatif hemogram değerlerine göre incelendiğinde aralarında anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p: 0,297 ve p: 0,254).Maternal sistemik hastalıklara göre de gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmamış olup intraoperatif ve postope- ratif komplikasyon oranlarının da benzer olduğu görüldü. Bebekler doğum kiloları, APGAR değerleri ve yenidoğanyoğun bakım ihtiyacı açısından incelendiğinde aralarında istatistiksel anlamlı farklılık saptanmamıştır. Sonuç: Acil ya da elektif şartlarda yapılan sezeryan doğumlar arasında anne ve bebek açısından anlamlı farklılık gözlenmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAYA, S., YEREBASMAZ, N., ALDEMİR, O., ALTINBAŞ, S. (2022). Which is More Dependable for Mother And Baby: Elective or Emergent Cesarean?. Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 194–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/585927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making: ACOG com- mittee opinion: no. 289 (November 2003). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84:188-93
  2. Alan TN, Tita Ph.D., Landon MB, Spong CY, Lai Y. Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outco- mes N Engl J Med. 2009 January 8; 360(2): 111–120. doi:10.1056/ NEJMoa0803267
  3. F Mohammed AB, Bayo AI, Abu-Jubara MF. Timing of Electi- ve Repeated Cesarean Delivery in Patients with Previous Two or More Cesarean Section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Aug 10. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3109/14767058.2012.718001)
  4. Jain L, Dudell GG. Respiratory transition in infants delivered by cesarean section. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:296–304
  5. Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Papatsonis DN,Neonatal outcome following elective ce- sarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospec- tive analysis of a national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):250.e1-8
  6. Grammatopoulos DK, Hillhouse EW. Role of corticotropinrelea- sing hormone in onset of labour. Lancet 1999;354:1546–9
  7. Majzoub JA, McGregor JA, Lockwood CJ, Smith R, Taggart MS, Schulkin J. A central theory of preterm and term labor: putative role for corticotropin-releasing hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:S232–41
  8. Hales KA, Morgan MA, Thurnau GR. Influence of labor and route of delivery on the frequency of respiratory morbidity in term neo- nates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993;43:35–40
  9. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:439–42
  10. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbi- dity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective cesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102: 101–6
  11. Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Solda G, Salvadori A, Trevisa- nuto D. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:643–7
  12. Gerten KA, Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Chambliss LR. Caesarean de- livery and respiratory distress syndrome: does labor make a diffe- rence? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1061-4
  13. Yee W, Amin H, Woo S. Elective Cesarean Delivery, Neonatal In- tensive Care Unit Admission, and Neonatal Respiratory Distress. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):823-8
  14. Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R R